|
From: Boursin O. <oli...@in...> - 2012-03-01 16:32:28
|
Hello, I just migrate from Devil-Linux 1.4.2-i686 to Devil-Linux 1.6.0-RC2-i686 and It seem that there is an error message concerning udevd at the beginning. udevd (925): /proc/925/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/925/oom_score_adj instead. It is not blocking anything for me but I report this as it is still a RC. Does anyone else have this message ? O. Boursin |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-02 18:27:57
|
Quoting Boursin Olivier <oli...@in...>: > Hello, > I just migrate from Devil-Linux 1.4.2-i686 to Devil-Linux 1.6.0-RC2-i686 > and It seem that there is an error message concerning udevd at the > beginning. > > udevd (925): /proc/925/oom_adj is deprecated, please use > /proc/925/oom_score_adj instead. > > It is not blocking anything for me but I report this as it is still a > RC. > Does anyone else have this message ? The next DL release will have the latest udev, hopefully this will resolve your issue. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-05 14:55:43
|
Quoting Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: > Quoting Boursin Olivier <oli...@in...>: > >> Hello, >> I just migrate from Devil-Linux 1.4.2-i686 to Devil-Linux 1.6.0-RC2-i686 >> and It seem that there is an error message concerning udevd at the >> beginning. >> >> udevd (925): /proc/925/oom_adj is deprecated, please use >> /proc/925/oom_score_adj instead. >> >> It is not blocking anything for me but I report this as it is still a >> RC. >> Does anyone else have this message ? > > The next DL release will have the latest udev, hopefully this will > resolve your issue. Adding the new udev has turned out to be much more complicated than I anticipated. I'll play around more, but don't have an ETA yet on when a newer version will be included. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-05 17:42:50
|
Heiko, I have a working udev-173. It seems to be the last "old" udev (no mandatory /run, do devfs, no kmod etc) - if you don't mind I'll update DL to this version. Serge On 03/05/2012 06:55 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>: > >> Quoting Boursin Olivier<oli...@in...>: >> >>> Hello, >>> I just migrate from Devil-Linux 1.4.2-i686 to Devil-Linux 1.6.0-RC2-i686 >>> and It seem that there is an error message concerning udevd at the >>> beginning. >>> >>> udevd (925): /proc/925/oom_adj is deprecated, please use >>> /proc/925/oom_score_adj instead. >>> >>> It is not blocking anything for me but I report this as it is still a >>> RC. >>> Does anyone else have this message ? >> >> The next DL release will have the latest udev, hopefully this will >> resolve your issue. > > Adding the new udev has turned out to be much more complicated than I > anticipated. I'll play around more, but don't have an ETA yet on when > a newer version will be included. > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-05 18:31:49
|
Serge, Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>: > I have a working udev-173. It seems to be the last "old" udev (no mandatory > /run, do devfs, no kmod etc) - if you don't mind I'll update DL to > this version. Yes that would be great. I'll keep looking into the "new" udev, but only have limited time available. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-06 01:19:28
|
I now have a working version with the new udev. Unfortunately it doesn't like our aoe rule set and even complains about some of its own. I don't think this is worth potentially delaying the final 1.6... Thoughts? -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Heiko Zuerker [mailto:he...@zu...] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 12:32 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] deprecated oom_adj in udevd > > Serge, > > Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>: > > I have a working udev-173. It seems to be the last "old" udev (no > > mandatory /run, do devfs, no kmod etc) - if you don't mind I'll update > > DL to this version. > > Yes that would be great. > I'll keep looking into the "new" udev, but only have limited time available. > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is > just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro > Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-06 01:52:41
|
Sure. Disable it for now - I'll try to adapt the rules and re-enable it then. Serge On 03/05/2012 05:19 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > I now have a working version with the new udev. > Unfortunately it doesn't like our aoe rule set and even complains about some > of its own. > I don't think this is worth potentially delaying the final 1.6... Thoughts? > |