From: DBTEX <db...@db...> - 2004-12-22 22:39:57
|
IMQ - when can we expect it!? Best regards and greetings for 1.2.1 Piotr |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-01-27 14:07:56
|
Hello DL community, is anybody still using IMQ? IMQ is (once again) preventing us from moving to the latest kernel, since there's no new patch out yet. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-01-27 17:06:56
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > is anybody still using IMQ? > IMQ is (once again) preventing us from moving to the latest kernel, > since there's no new patch out yet. I'm using ifb only. My choice was dictated by the better opinion of ifb than imq. Probably IMQ is less stable, although apparently more comfortable. Best Regards Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-12-22 23:48:01
|
DBTEX wrote: >IMQ - when can we expect it!? > >Best regards and greetings for 1.2.1 >Piotr > > > IMQ is already included for a while. ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
From: Peter F. <pe...@em...> - 2004-12-27 15:40:48
|
Not only in IMQ included...it is VERY robust. I have it in networks from 200 to 1200 nodes, and it has not given me a single trouble. I can vouch for its stability, having servers up for months at a time without a hitch. I would take this renewed opportunity to thank Heiko for it, for I believe that it was under my insistence that IMQ was included in the first place. Thank you!!! Peter On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 17:46 -0600, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > DBTEX wrote: > > >IMQ - when can we expect it!? > > > >Best regards and greetings for 1.2.1 > >Piotr > > > > > > > IMQ is already included for a while. ;-) > |