Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2010-08-30 23:18:32
|
No, I have not. Let's try different hardware, hopefully it'll fix the problem Serge On 08/30/2010 07:27 AM, mailing dl2 wrote: > Hello, > > Back from holiday... > > I did "Firmware Test Suite: BIOS+ACPI health check" and everything passed. > > If you have another thought, I can try it, otherwise, I will try to > use a newer computer when I need Harddisk support. > > Thanks for your help > > > 2010/8/12 Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: >> This is a link to "Firmware Test Suite: BIOS+ACPI health check" >> >> http://smackerelofopinion.blogspot.com/2010/08/firmware-test-suite-biosacpi-health.html >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> If you want to run the tool from a bootable USB flash key, then one can download >> a i386 or amd64 image and dd it to a USB flash key. >> >> For example: >> >> wget http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/testing/maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img >> sudo dd if=maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img of=/dev/sdX >> >> where /dev/sdX is the block device of your USB flash key >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 08/11/2010 11:42 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update >>> bios, replace memory modules etc. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure it will help. >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. >>>> >>>> I use Dell Optiplex GX280. >>>> >>>> Thanks anyway for your help. >>>> >>> |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2010-08-30 19:35:33
|
Hi James, On 08/30/2010 10:49 AM, James Kessler wrote: > I want openvpn to start as a deamon at startup. > I wrote a small sh file that I want to execute when Devil starts up. Actually DL has init script for openvpn and you need only to enable OpenVPN in /etc/sysconfig/config: # Start openvpn? START_OPENVPN=yes ... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > My openvpn.log is giving me this error: > > OpenVPN 2.1 requires '--script-security 2' or higher to call > user-defined scripts or executables > Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2) > Attempting fallback to kernel 2.2 TUN/TAP interface > Cannot allocate TUN/TAP dev dynamically > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > If I execute the command: openvpn --daemon --config > /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf --log /etc/mnt/hd/log/openvpn.log > > After the system boots up, it executes correctly and without issues. > Is there something I am missing? To be short - yes. You forgot to load "tun" module before openvpn start. add "modprobe tun" before your script or (preferable) use system init script for openvpn (/etc/init.d/openvpn) > Am I pointing to the sh file incorrectly in boot.local? That's correct. > Should it be elsewhere? Any and all help is > welcome. Thanks! Serge |
|
From: James K. <jke...@gm...> - 2010-08-30 17:49:52
|
I want openvpn to start as a deamon at startup. I wrote a small sh file that I want to execute when Devil starts up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the sh file: #!/bin/sh cd /etc/openvpn/ openvpn --daemon --config /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf --log /etc/mnt/hd/log/openvpn.log ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I made an entry in boot.local that points to that sh file. This is the entry: /etc/openvpn/openvpnStart.sh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My openvpn.log is giving me this error: OpenVPN 2.1 requires '--script-security 2' or higher to call user-defined scripts or executables Cannot open TUN/TAP dev /dev/net/tun: No such file or directory (errno=2) Attempting fallback to kernel 2.2 TUN/TAP interface Cannot allocate TUN/TAP dev dynamically ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I execute the command: openvpn --daemon --config /etc/openvpn/openvpn.conf --log /etc/mnt/hd/log/openvpn.log After the system boots up, it executes correctly and without issues. Is there something I am missing? Am I pointing to the sh file incorrectly in boot.local? Should it be elsewhere? Any and all help is welcome. Thanks! -- James E. Kessler |
|
From: mailing d. <mai...@gm...> - 2010-08-30 14:27:34
|
Hello, Back from holiday... I did "Firmware Test Suite: BIOS+ACPI health check" and everything passed. If you have another thought, I can try it, otherwise, I will try to use a newer computer when I need Harddisk support. Thanks for your help 2010/8/12 Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > This is a link to "Firmware Test Suite: BIOS+ACPI health check" > > http://smackerelofopinion.blogspot.com/2010/08/firmware-test-suite-biosacpi-health.html > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > If you want to run the tool from a bootable USB flash key, then one can download > a i386 or amd64 image and dd it to a USB flash key. > > For example: > > wget http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/testing/maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img > sudo dd if=maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img of=/dev/sdX > > where /dev/sdX is the block device of your USB flash key > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Serge > > > On 08/11/2010 11:42 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Hello, >> >> actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update >> bios, replace memory modules etc. >> >> I'm pretty sure it will help. >> >> Serge >> >> On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. >>> >>> I use Dell Optiplex GX280. >>> >>> Thanks anyway for your help. >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-08-22 05:37:26
|
Hello, unfortunately, the kernel I used is not good. See details here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588 So, if your kernel is "freezing, crashing, oopsing" please download a new image with updated kernel. PS. The image is a bit heavier because I added several packages to test. Serge On 08/19/2010 04:44 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Hello, > > I have updated ISO - KVM works fine, Sheepdog has been incorporated but not tested. > > ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64/bootcd.iso > > 129M Aug 19 16:35 bootcd.iso > 45 Aug 19 16:37 bootcd.iso.md5 > > > Serge > > > On 08/01/2010 07:57 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Hi Jiri, >> >> You can download the test image from ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64 >> >> Please feel free to ask me directly in case of any problems. I've included init >> script and a VM template (/etc/kvm/* ) to simplify the first step. Please use >> kvmctl tool to manage your VMs. >> >> Sheepdog is not incorporated, but I'm going to do it. >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 07/27/2010 12:39 AM, Motycka Jiri wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Thank you very much. Your ansver makes me happy :-). >>> You can count with me as a tester. But at first I must get some >>> information about KVM on my own, because I have never met KVM before. >>> >>> Jiri >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Původní zpráva -------- >>> Předmět: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL as virtualisation platform >>> Od: Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> >>> Komu: dev...@li... >>> Datum: 22.7.2010 20:32 >>>> Hi Jiri, >>>> >>>> it's a good idea, but I'd rather do it with KVM :) because it's a mainstream, >>>> sheepdog (a distributed storage system) will be available soon etc >>>> >>>> The requirement is 64bit DL, which is actually in alpha. If you wish tobe a >>>> tester, you are very welcome. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, I have no time to play with KVM on DL, but I've compiledit. >>>> Maybe it works. >>>> >>>> Serge >>>> >>>> On 07/22/2010 02:31 AM, Motycka Jiri wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello DL community. >>>>> >>>>> I have got an idea. What about making DL as a small virtualisation >>>>> platform. Tool for this could be VirtualBox OSE. >>>>> With couple of benefits of DL (genial system of booting, configuring, sw >>>>> raid support, lvm) it could be very useful (I think). >>>>> I would like to try to compile VirtualBox OSE HeadLess to DL, but I am >>>>> totaly unexperienced in it. And my tries ended just at start :(. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think about it ? >>>>> Is there anybody skilled to compile Virtualbox OSE Headless to DL ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jiri Motycka > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-08-19 23:44:52
|
Hello, I have updated ISO - KVM works fine, Sheepdog has been incorporated but not tested. ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64/bootcd.iso 129M Aug 19 16:35 bootcd.iso 45 Aug 19 16:37 bootcd.iso.md5 Serge On 08/01/2010 07:57 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > You can download the test image from ftp://olga.mooo.com/DL_64 > > Please feel free to ask me directly in case of any problems. I've included init > script and a VM template (/etc/kvm/* ) to simplify the first step. Please use > kvmctl tool to manage your VMs. > > Sheepdog is not incorporated, but I'm going to do it. > > Serge > > > On 07/27/2010 12:39 AM, Motycka Jiri wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Thank you very much. Your ansver makes me happy :-). >> You can count with me as a tester. But at first I must get some >> information about KVM on my own, because I have never met KVM before. >> >> Jiri >> >> >> >> >> -------- Původní zpráva -------- >> Předmět: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL as virtualisation platform >> Od: Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> >> Komu: dev...@li... >> Datum: 22.7.2010 20:32 >>> Hi Jiri, >>> >>> it's a good idea, but I'd rather do it with KVM :) because it's a mainstream, >>> sheepdog (a distributed storage system) will be available soon etc >>> >>> The requirement is 64bit DL, which is actually in alpha. If you wish tobe a >>> tester, you are very welcome. >>> >>> Unfortunately, I have no time to play with KVM on DL, but I've compiledit. >>> Maybe it works. >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> On 07/22/2010 02:31 AM, Motycka Jiri wrote: >>> >>>> Hello DL community. >>>> >>>> I have got an idea. What about making DL as a small virtualisation >>>> platform. Tool for this could be VirtualBox OSE. >>>> With couple of benefits of DL (genial system of booting, configuring, sw >>>> raid support, lvm) it could be very useful (I think). >>>> I would like to try to compile VirtualBox OSE HeadLess to DL, but I am >>>> totaly unexperienced in it. And my tries ended just at start :(. >>>> >>>> What do you think about it ? >>>> Is there anybody skilled to compile Virtualbox OSE Headless to DL ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Jiri Motycka |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@fo...> - 2010-08-19 23:27:44
|
On 08/20/10 00:25, Dick Middleton wrote: > On 08/19/10 23:01, Bradlee Landis wrote: > re: a deep packet inspection software > >> Does Devil-Linux have, > > I don't think so Seems I was wrong :-( Dick -- Dick Middleton di...@fo... PGP Key ID: 0x9F9434FD |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@fo...> - 2010-08-19 23:26:00
|
On 08/19/10 23:01, Bradlee Landis wrote: re: a deep packet inspection software > Does Devil-Linux have, I don't think so or can we get, you can build your own DL install 'CD' <QUOTE from the website > Create your own, customized version with our Build System Since everybody has different requirements, Devil-Linux provides you with an easy-to-use build system, which enables you to create your own customized version. You can i.e. only add the packages you need on your machine or even add features which are currently missing in the mainstream version. </QUOTE> That's probably the quickest way to get what you want. Even if DL does decide to include this sw it will take a while. Dick |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-08-19 23:18:17
|
Hi Bradlee, l7-filter is a part of DL. Serge On 08/19/2010 03:01 PM, Bradlee Landis wrote: > Does Devil-Linux have, or can we get, a deep packet inspection > software installed? I think they both have to be compiled into the > kernel. I've found these two open-source projects: > * http://l7-filter.clearfoundation.com/ > * http://www.opendpi.org/opendpi.org/index.html > > l7-filter looked the better to me, but I'm not exactly sure on how to > use it yet. > |
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2010-08-19 22:01:57
|
Does Devil-Linux have, or can we get, a deep packet inspection software installed? I think they both have to be compiled into the kernel. I've found these two open-source projects: * http://l7-filter.clearfoundation.com/ * http://www.opendpi.org/opendpi.org/index.html l7-filter looked the better to me, but I'm not exactly sure on how to use it yet. -- Thanks, Brad Landis |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-16 16:17:15
|
Could you please create 2 separate bugs in Mantis, so we don't loose track of these issues? http://sourceforge.net/apps/mantisbt/devil-linux Heiko Quoting Motycka Jiri <mai...@vc...>: > Hello. > > I would like to know, why dansguardian is not compiled with support of > clamd (clamav). > I am trying to build proxy with content filtering (squid + dansguardian > + clamav) and I hit the wall when I noticed that ClamAV scanning is not > compiled into dansguardian. > I am testing this on DL 1.4RC4 version. > > And one notice at the end. > I found that the utility squid_ldap_auth is compiled with squid but > utility squid_ldap_group not. I think, that utlity squid_ldap_group is > in common squid package and it would be a matter of some compiling > switch. This utility is usefull when you want to use LDAP groups in > squid ACLs. > > Jiri Motycka > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Chris G. <dl...@ki...> - 2010-08-16 15:52:25
|
Hi Dominic, I agree about the block sizes. What I forgot to mention is that there are 7 IDE drives in total in the machine including the 400Gb but its only the 400Gb that's giving the error. I've just noticed that Webmin is reporting me to have 3.16Gb of memory which is a bit odd. I'll take the server offline tonight and run memtest as you suggested and see if it throws up any errors. Thanks again, Chris. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dominic Raferd" <dl...@ed...> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 4:10 PM To: <dev...@li...> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] attempt to access beyond end of device > Hi Chris > > This is all new to me, but it does seem that the limit figure reported > is about right for a 400GB drive if the blocks are 512 bytes each, > whereas the 'want' figure is excessively high. So it looks as if > something (probably some metadata on the disk, like directory entry or > control block) is pointing to a completely invalid location. Could be > caused by damaged meta-information (filesystem structure data) on the > disk, or possibly bad RAM chips. At boot time DL offers a memory test > option, could you run this overnight? > > Dominic > > On 16/08/2010 14:55, Chris Grove wrote: >> Hi All. I'm hoping someone might be able to point me in the right >> direction here. I've got a problem on my DL server where by I'll be >> playing a file from this drive and it'll just stop. When I check the >> dmesg on the DL box its got about 200 entries saying the following: >> attempt to access beyond end of device >> hdc1: rw=0, want=10362186664, limit=781417602 >> Now the drive is a fairly new 400Gb drive and according to the SMART >> info that Webmin has displayed the drive is ok. I've also run >> fsck.ext3 on the partition and got a few inode errors, which it >> fixed. But I've just copied data to the drive again and got the error >> Sad smile emoticon Can anyone please shed some light on this please. >> Oh, I'm using a fairly old build of 1.4 if that makes any difference. >> Thanks in advance, Chris. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-08-16 15:10:22
|
Hi Chris This is all new to me, but it does seem that the limit figure reported is about right for a 400GB drive if the blocks are 512 bytes each, whereas the 'want' figure is excessively high. So it looks as if something (probably some metadata on the disk, like directory entry or control block) is pointing to a completely invalid location. Could be caused by damaged meta-information (filesystem structure data) on the disk, or possibly bad RAM chips. At boot time DL offers a memory test option, could you run this overnight? Dominic On 16/08/2010 14:55, Chris Grove wrote: > Hi All. I'm hoping someone might be able to point me in the right > direction here. I've got a problem on my DL server where by I'll be > playing a file from this drive and it'll just stop. When I check the > dmesg on the DL box its got about 200 entries saying the following: > attempt to access beyond end of device > hdc1: rw=0, want=10362186664, limit=781417602 > Now the drive is a fairly new 400Gb drive and according to the SMART > info that Webmin has displayed the drive is ok. I've also run > fsck.ext3 on the partition and got a few inode errors, which it > fixed. But I've just copied data to the drive again and got the error > Sad smile emoticon Can anyone please shed some light on this please. > Oh, I'm using a fairly old build of 1.4 if that makes any difference. > Thanks in advance, Chris. |
|
From: Motycka J. <mai...@vc...> - 2010-08-16 11:58:52
|
Hello. I would like to know, why dansguardian is not compiled with support of clamd (clamav). I am trying to build proxy with content filtering (squid + dansguardian + clamav) and I hit the wall when I noticed that ClamAV scanning is not compiled into dansguardian. I am testing this on DL 1.4RC4 version. And one notice at the end. I found that the utility squid_ldap_auth is compiled with squid but utility squid_ldap_group not. I think, that utlity squid_ldap_group is in common squid package and it would be a matter of some compiling switch. This utility is usefull when you want to use LDAP groups in squid ACLs. Jiri Motycka |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-08-12 17:55:15
|
This is a link to "Firmware Test Suite: BIOS+ACPI health check" http://smackerelofopinion.blogspot.com/2010/08/firmware-test-suite-biosacpi-health.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you want to run the tool from a bootable USB flash key, then one can download a i386 or amd64 image and dd it to a USB flash key. For example: wget http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/testing/maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img sudo dd if=maverick-desktop-i386-fwts.img of=/dev/sdX where /dev/sdX is the block device of your USB flash key -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Serge On 08/11/2010 11:42 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Hello, > > actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update > bios, replace memory modules etc. > > I'm pretty sure it will help. > > Serge > > On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. >> >> I use Dell Optiplex GX280. >> >> Thanks anyway for your help. >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: mailing d. <mai...@gm...> - 2010-08-12 12:13:06
|
Hello, I am sorry for my late answer but I did run a diagnostic with a Dell CD diagnostic tools. I wanted to have the result before posting. All test have passed on one computer Dell GX280. It has the latest Bios available and 1GB of Ram. > When you said you tried 3 different machines, where they all the same model? It was two Dell GX280 and one Dell GX150. We use a lot of these old hardware to build small web servers and remote admin sniffer. P.S. I will not able to do more test because I will be out of the office for the next two week (from today) Regards. 2010/8/12 Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: > Hey, > > I agree that it may be hardware related (or a specific driver), since > nobody else see the same error. > When you said you tried 3 different machines, where they all the same model? > > Heiko > > Quoting Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > >> Hello, >> >> actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update >> bios, replace memory modules etc. >> >> I'm pretty sure it will help. >> >> Serge >> >> On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. >>> >>> I use Dell Optiplex GX280. >>> >>> Thanks anyway for your help. >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> > > > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-12 12:01:06
|
Hey, I agree that it may be hardware related (or a specific driver), since nobody else see the same error. When you said you tried 3 different machines, where they all the same model? Heiko Quoting Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > Hello, > > actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update > bios, replace memory modules etc. > > I'm pretty sure it will help. > > Serge > > On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. >> >> I use Dell Optiplex GX280. >> >> Thanks anyway for your help. >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-08-12 06:42:37
|
Hello, actually it's a memory-related error. Is it possible to play with HW? Update bios, replace memory modules etc. I'm pretty sure it will help. Serge On 08/11/2010 11:02 PM, mailing dl2 wrote: > Hello, > > I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. > > I use Dell Optiplex GX280. > > Thanks anyway for your help. > |
|
From: mailing d. <mai...@gm...> - 2010-08-12 06:03:02
|
Hello, I did test the rc5 regarding the LVM issue and I receive the same errors. I use Dell Optiplex GX280. Thanks anyway for your help. 2010/8/11 mailing dl2 <mai...@gm...>: > Thanks Heiko, > > I will test it. > > > 2010/8/11 Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: >> I have 1.4RC5 up and running, all looking good so far... >> >> Dominic >> >> On 10/08/2010 18:53, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> I uploaded a testing release to: ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ >>> >>> Please let us know the results. >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> > |
|
From: mailing d. <mai...@gm...> - 2010-08-11 10:47:37
|
Thanks Heiko, I will test it. 2010/8/11 Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > I have 1.4RC5 up and running, all looking good so far... > > Dominic > > On 10/08/2010 18:53, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> I uploaded a testing release to: ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ >> >> Please let us know the results. >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-08-11 08:20:52
|
I have 1.4RC5 up and running, all looking good so far... Dominic On 10/08/2010 18:53, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > I uploaded a testing release to: ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ > > Please let us know the results. > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-10 17:54:00
|
I uploaded a testing release to: ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ Please let us know the results. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-08-09 13:47:35
|
My problem turned out to be exacerbated by my having changed the user line in xinetd.conf at some point in the past from root to something else. Doh! The /etc/pam.d file has to be called samba, not swat, but otherwise your settings work for me. Thanks Heiko! Dominic On 09/08/2010 13:20, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > auth sufficient pam_rootok.so > auth required pam_unix.so > account required pam_unix.so > session required pam_unix.so > password required pam_permit.so > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-09 12:20:38
|
Hey, attached you find the 2 files I use on my test vm. Not sure if the files are secure, they were good enough for testing. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-08-08 16:14:59
|
Thanks Heiko, I think you are right about the problem being to do with pam.d, but I have tried a lot of settings for file /etc/pam.d/samba but I still have (different) authentication failures. The other files in /etc/pam.d all seem to have individual settings and I have tried lots of them! Does anyone have pam.d settings which can work for SWAT login under DL 1.4? Regards Dominic On 06/08/10 18:19, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > You're more than likely have to create the service in /etc/pam.d > I usually just copy another one and then give it the right name (i.e. swat) > > Heiko > > Quoting Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...>: > > >> On 06/08/2010 15:50, Bradlee Landis wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Sorry, but no support for a telnet server at all. >>>> If your boss ask: DL is a security oriented distribution and you can't >>>> get much more unsecure than using telnet. Well okay, empty passwords >>>> maybe.... ;-) >>>> >>>> >>> Well, I agree that it's unsecure. But if people want to put the >>> security of their system at risk, then I will allow them to do so as >>> long as they know what they are doing. It's not my place to tell them >>> no. I can tell someone that jumping out of a plane is bad, but that >>> doesn't mean I can stop them from doing it. >>> >>> I've actually found that telnetd is on Devil Linux. It's under >>> /usr/sbin/krb5/telnetd. I am able to telnet in after creating >>> /etc/xinet.d/krb5-telnet, and turning off all other xinetd services, >>> but it's not letting me log in as root. I'm thinking that the problem >>> is with /etc/securetty... >>> >>> >> I am unable to log in as root to SWAT (Samba Web Administration Tool) >> which also works thru xinetd. This used to work but at some point in the >> upgrade cycle it broke. I don't need SWAT so I am not too bothered. But >> it might be that we have the same underlying problem... >> >> Dominic >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> >> > > |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
