From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2010-02-24 13:13:22
|
Hi, Small inconsistency. sipcalc is present in Makefiles but there is no script sipcalc (as for now). Compilation stops. Rgds -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-24 13:24:07
|
Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > Small inconsistency. sipcalc is present in Makefiles but there is no script > sipcalc (as for now). Compilation stops. Refresh from CVS, Serge already corrected the problem. Not sure if it'll compile all the way through, my test is still running. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2010-02-24 14:23:20
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Refresh from CVS, Serge already corrected the problem. > Not sure if it'll compile all the way through, my test is still running. :) BTW. I examined sipcalc --- it is convenient tool. I will install and use it. Rgds -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-24 15:27:33
|
Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Refresh from CVS, Serge already corrected the problem. >> Not sure if it'll compile all the way through, my test is still running. > :) > BTW. I examined sipcalc --- it is convenient tool. I will install and use it. Serge already has the code for DL, we were just discussing replacing ipcalc with sipcalc. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-26 01:19:00
|
Bruce, sorry for my hasty decision. I need your help. I'm not sure that I've completely understood how it works... Is it correct change? - eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) + eval $(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) If I configure NIC by setup I get the following config ----------------------------- DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes MODULE=autoselect DHCP=no IP="192.168.1.2" NETMASK="255.255.255.224" BROADCAST="" ----------------------------- Broadcast is empty and I don't understand if it's improper sipcalc usage or not. Serge On 02/25/2010 05:00 AM, Bruce Smith wrote: > Either way is fine with me. > > If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. > > - BS > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> I see this line in setup >> eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >> >> Do we need to calculate broadcast? >> >> sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 >> >> does the same. >> >> PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. >>> >>> Is there any reason we can't have both programs? >>> >>> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? >>> >>> - BS >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>>> To: dev...@li... >>>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>>> >>>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>>> upload the package >>>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>>> >>>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>>> perl script >>>>> known as: >>>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>>> >>>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>>> >>>> I'm good with it too. >>>> >>>> Heiko >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>> Dev...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >> >> > |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2010-02-26 01:26:41
|
the ipcalc should return the broadcast address, so there appears to be something wrong with your setup fix. Try this instead (untested): BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) - BS On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 20:18, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: > Bruce, > > sorry for my hasty decision. I need your help. I'm not sure that I've completely > understood how it works... > > Is it correct change? > - eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) > + eval $(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) > > If I configure NIC by setup I get the following config > ----------------------------- > DEVICE=eth0 > ONBOOT=yes > MODULE=autoselect > DHCP=no > IP="192.168.1.2" > NETMASK="255.255.255.224" > BROADCAST="" > ----------------------------- > > Broadcast is empty and I don't understand if it's improper sipcalc usage or not. > > Serge > > On 02/25/2010 05:00 AM, Bruce Smith wrote: >> Either way is fine with me. >> >> If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. >> >> - BS >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >>> Bruce, >>> >>> I see this line in setup >>> eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >>> >>> Do we need to calculate broadcast? >>> >>> sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 >>> >>> does the same. >>> >>> PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> >>> On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>>> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. >>>> >>>> Is there any reason we can't have both programs? >>>> >>>> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? >>>> >>>> - BS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>>>> To: dev...@li... >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>>>> upload the package >>>>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>>>> >>>>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>>>> perl script >>>>>> known as: >>>>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>>>> >>>>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>>>> >>>>> I'm good with it too. >>>>> >>>>> Heiko >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>> Dev...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-25 02:25:14
|
Guys, I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll upload the package and script (and remove ipcalc) Serge On 02/24/2010 06:27 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > >> Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> Refresh from CVS, Serge already corrected the problem. >>> Not sure if it'll compile all the way through, my test is still running. >> :) >> BTW. I examined sipcalc --- it is convenient tool. I will install and use it. > > Serge already has the code for DL, we were just discussing replacing > ipcalc with sipcalc. > |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2010-02-25 02:37:08
|
Hi, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. Absolutely no problem. :) > So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll upload the package > and script (and remove ipcalc) As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using perl script known as: > # IPv4 Calculator > # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 > # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. Rgrds -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-25 02:38:59
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? > > Hi, > > Serge Leschinsky wrote: > > I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. > Absolutely no problem. :) > > > So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll > upload the package > > and script (and remove ipcalc) > > As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using > perl script > known as: > > # IPv4 Calculator > > # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 > > # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc > > But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. I'm good with it too. Heiko |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-25 03:24:10
|
I've uploaded the new code. Should I remove the original ipcalc? Serge On 02/24/2010 06:38 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >> To: dev...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >> >> Hi, >> >> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >> Absolutely no problem. :) >> >>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >> upload the package >>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >> >> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >> perl script >> known as: >>> # IPv4 Calculator >>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >> >> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. > > I'm good with it too. > > Heiko > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-25 03:30:53
|
Since it's useless, I'd vote yes. Would it make sense creating a symlink sipcalc -> ipcalc ? Heiko > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Leschinsky [mailto:fi...@in...] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:24 PM > To: dev...@li... > Cc: Heiko Zuerker > Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? > > I've uploaded the new code. Should I remove the original ipcalc? > > Serge > > On 02/24/2010 06:38 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM > >> To: dev...@li... > >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Serge Leschinsky wrote: > >>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. > >> Absolutely no problem. :) > >> > >>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll > >> upload the package > >>> and script (and remove ipcalc) > >> > >> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using > >> perl script > >> known as: > >>> # IPv4 Calculator > >>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 > >>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc > >> > >> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. > > > > I'm good with it too. > > > > Heiko > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find > bugs > > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-25 04:11:19
|
Yes. As for me I suppose I would never have guessed that sipcalc is an ip calculator, but not a SIP (VoIP) application. Symlink is a good idea. Serge On 02/24/2010 07:30 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Since it's useless, I'd vote yes. > Would it make sense creating a symlink sipcalc -> ipcalc ? > > Heiko > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Serge Leschinsky [mailto:fi...@in...] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:24 PM >> To: dev...@li... >> Cc: Heiko Zuerker >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >> >> I've uploaded the new code. Should I remove the original ipcalc? >> >> Serge >> >> On 02/24/2010 06:38 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>> To: dev...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>> >>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>> upload the package >>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>> >>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>> perl script >>>> known as: >>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>> >>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>> >>> I'm good with it too. >>> >>> Heiko >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------------- >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find >> bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------- >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2010-02-25 03:57:04
|
The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. Is there any reason we can't have both programs? Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? - BS On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >> To: dev...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >> >> Hi, >> >> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> > I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >> Absolutely no problem. :) >> >> > So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >> upload the package >> > and script (and remove ipcalc) >> >> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >> perl script >> known as: >> > # IPv4 Calculator >> > # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >> > # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >> >> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. > > I'm good with it too. > > Heiko > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-25 04:07:52
|
Bruce, I see this line in setup eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) Do we need to calculate broadcast? sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 does the same. PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc Serge On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: > The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. > > Is there any reason we can't have both programs? > > Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? > > - BS > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>> To: dev...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>> >>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>> upload the package >>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>> >>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>> perl script >>> known as: >>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>> >>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >> >> I'm good with it too. >> >> Heiko >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-26 02:17:56
|
Bruce, thank you. BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 | tr -d [:space:]) It works. I'm going to submit the patch Serge On 02/25/2010 05:26 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: > the ipcalc should return the broadcast address, so there appears to be > something wrong with your setup fix. > > Try this instead (untested): > > BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) > > - BS > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 20:18, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> sorry for my hasty decision. I need your help. I'm not sure that I've completely >> understood how it works... >> >> Is it correct change? >> - eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >> + eval $(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) >> >> If I configure NIC by setup I get the following config >> ----------------------------- >> DEVICE=eth0 >> ONBOOT=yes >> MODULE=autoselect >> DHCP=no >> IP="192.168.1.2" >> NETMASK="255.255.255.224" >> BROADCAST="" >> ----------------------------- >> >> Broadcast is empty and I don't understand if it's improper sipcalc usage or not. >> >> Serge >> >> On 02/25/2010 05:00 AM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>> Either way is fine with me. >>> >>> If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. >>> >>> - BS >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >>>> Bruce, >>>> >>>> I see this line in setup >>>> eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >>>> >>>> Do we need to calculate broadcast? >>>> >>>> sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 >>>> >>>> does the same. >>>> >>>> PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc >>>> >>>> Serge >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>>>> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. >>>>> >>>>> Is there any reason we can't have both programs? >>>>> >>>>> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? >>>>> >>>>> - BS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>>>>> To: dev...@li... >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>>>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>>>>> upload the package >>>>>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>>>>> perl script >>>>>>> known as: >>>>>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm good with it too. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heiko >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2010-02-26 02:47:37
|
Cool. ipcalc included the "BROADCAST=" part, hence the "eval". - BS On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 21:17, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: > Bruce, > > thank you. > > BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 | > tr -d [:space:]) > > It works. I'm going to submit the patch > > Serge > > > On 02/25/2010 05:26 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >> the ipcalc should return the broadcast address, so there appears to be >> something wrong with your setup fix. >> >> Try this instead (untested): >> >> BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) >> >> - BS >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 20:18, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >>> Bruce, >>> >>> sorry for my hasty decision. I need your help. I'm not sure that I've completely >>> understood how it works... >>> >>> Is it correct change? >>> - eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >>> + eval $(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2) >>> >>> If I configure NIC by setup I get the following config >>> ----------------------------- >>> DEVICE=eth0 >>> ONBOOT=yes >>> MODULE=autoselect >>> DHCP=no >>> IP="192.168.1.2" >>> NETMASK="255.255.255.224" >>> BROADCAST="" >>> ----------------------------- >>> >>> Broadcast is empty and I don't understand if it's improper sipcalc usage or not. >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> On 02/25/2010 05:00 AM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>>> Either way is fine with me. >>>> >>>> If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. >>>> >>>> - BS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: >>>>> Bruce, >>>>> >>>>> I see this line in setup >>>>> eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) >>>>> >>>>> Do we need to calculate broadcast? >>>>> >>>>> sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 >>>>> >>>>> does the same. >>>>> >>>>> PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc >>>>> >>>>> Serge >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >>>>>> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any reason we can't have both programs? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? >>>>>> >>>>>> - BS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>>>>>> To: dev...@li... >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>>>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>>>>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>>>>>> upload the package >>>>>>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>>>>>> perl script >>>>>>>> known as: >>>>>>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>>>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>>>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm good with it too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heiko >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2010-02-25 14:03:40
|
Either way is fine with me. If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. - BS On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote: > Bruce, > > I see this line in setup > eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null) > > Do we need to calculate broadcast? > > sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 > > does the same. > > PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc > > Serge > > > On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote: >> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup. >> >> Is there any reason we can't have both programs? >> >> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)? >> >> - BS >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM >>>> To: dev...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc? >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles. >>>> Absolutely no problem. :) >>>> >>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll >>>> upload the package >>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc) >>>> >>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using >>>> perl script >>>> known as: >>>>> # IPv4 Calculator >>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004 >>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc >>>> >>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice. >>> >>> I'm good with it too. >>> >>> Heiko >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >> > > |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2010-02-25 16:02:51
|
Bruce Smith wrote: > Either way is fine with me. > If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. Maybe, after removing ipcalc, in install phase of "sipcalc install", we should create link to sipcalc for ipcalc? For those people, who use traditional ipcalc everyday, ofcourse. -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-26 01:14:37
|
OK. I can. But it looks like a hasty decition to remove ipcalc without clear confirmation from all interested people. So, if Bruce confirms that he is ok with sipcalc I'll commit change with symlink creation, if he prefers original ipcalc - I commit a change to return script and binary back. I'm really sorry for troubling you, Serge On 02/25/2010 08:02 AM, Andrzej Odyniec wrote: > Bruce Smith wrote: >> Either way is fine with me. >> If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup. > > Maybe, after removing ipcalc, in install phase of "sipcalc install", we should > create link to sipcalc for ipcalc? For those people, who use traditional > ipcalc everyday, ofcourse. > |