From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-04-04 11:56:14
|
Hi everyone, I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2012-04-04 13:14:19
|
I think Serge fixed the only problem I found. - BS On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 07:56, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. > > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon. > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2012-04-04 13:45:48
|
all good here, no problems. Dominic On 04/04/2012 13:46, Bruce Smith wrote: > I think Serge fixed the only problem I found. > > - BS > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 07:56, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu... > <mailto:he...@zu...>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. > > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 > soon. > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > <mailto:Dev...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-04-04 17:35:04
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. > > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon. Heiko, I found only a cosmetic error. checkfs startup script is not executing and thus does not check the disks listed in fstab with six non-zero field as should be. Ofcourse anybody, who mounts nonramdisks, can change this script and store in own configuration. There is patch: > --- ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs.orig 2011-12-18 18:46:34.000000000 +0100 > +++ ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs 2012-04-01 18:04:34.280769382 +0200 > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > source /etc/init.d/functions > > # exit if there is no entry in /etc/fstab > -test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep ^$ )" && exit 0 > +test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep -v ^$ )" && exit 0 > > # > # Activate all the swap partitions declared in the /etc/fstab file > @@ -110,6 +110,4 @@ else > fi > fi > > -;; > - > # End /etc/init.d/checkfs The rest of the packages used by me, works fine. Best Regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-04-05 00:38:35
|
Andrzej, Could you please re-submit the patch as an attachment? -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:an...@ma...] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:35 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] 1.6.0-RC3 > > Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. > > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. > > > > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon. > > Heiko, > > I found only a cosmetic error. checkfs startup script is not executing and thus > does not check the disks listed in fstab with six non-zero field as should be. > Ofcourse anybody, who mounts nonramdisks, can change this script and > store in own configuration. There is patch: > > > --- ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs.orig 2011-12-18 > 18:46:34.000000000 +0100 > > +++ ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs 2012-04-01 > 18:04:34.280769382 +0200 > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > > source /etc/init.d/functions > > > > # exit if there is no entry in /etc/fstab -test -z "$( grep -v ^# > > /etc/fstab | grep ^$ )" && exit 0 > > +test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep -v ^$ )" && exit 0 > > > > # > > # Activate all the swap partitions declared in the /etc/fstab file @@ > > -110,6 +110,4 @@ else > > fi > > fi > > > > -;; > > - > > # End /etc/init.d/checkfs > > The rest of the packages used by me, works fine. > > Best Regards > > -- > Andrzej Odyniec > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big > Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. > Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-04-05 13:47:47
Attachments:
checkfs.diff
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Andrzej, > > Could you please re-submit the patch as an attachment? > Of course. But there are only basic corrections, for start and check filesystems. As I see, in /etc/init.d/checkfs scrip, there are dependency from presence of files /fastboot and /forcefsck, but this files are checked in root directory, but root directory is readonly so without changing boot image there is no possibility to control fastboot (without fsck) or forced fsck. Maybe this files should be tested in /etc, or on usb/disk boot partition? But this is to Your decision. -- Andrzej Odyniec |
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-04-06 07:45:00
|
I don't know about the open issues. Everything seems to be fine. Serge On 04/04/2012 04:56 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3. > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign. > > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon. > |