devil-linux-develop

[Devil-linux-develop] DL 1.2 Fail to Build : portslave didn't get compiled

[MaNU & S. <ee...@fr...>]

Hi All,

fresh new build env, src download ...

when i try to build DL 1.2, I get an error with portslave ...

...

creating src/Makefile
creating extract_and_patch
make[1]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
makedepend -Y -f depends *.c 2> /dev/null
make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
make[1]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19'
chmod 755 extract_and_patch
./extract_and_patch
make -C src
make[2]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
gcc -O2  -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -pedantic 
-I../ppp-2.4.1/pppd  -fPIC -DPIC -c -o libpsr_pic.o libpsr.c
libpsr.c:15:18: pppd.h: No such file or directory
libpsr.c:16:17: fsm.h: No such file or directory
libpsr.c:17:17: lcp.h: No such file or directory
libpsr.c:18:18: ipcp.h: No such file or directory
libpsr.c:19:18: cbcp.h: No such file or directory
In file included from server.h:5,
                 from libpsr.c:21:
../pslave_cfg.h:31:33: ppp-2.4.1/pppd/pppd.h: No such file or directory

...

De-select it in menuconfig and the build process didn't make any other 
error ...

Is there a relation with the fixes that where done few days ago on pppd ??

Regards

MaNU & SCaR

-- 
Emmanuel ESCARABAJAL
Sys-Admin et Logiciels Libres
ee...@fr...

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] DL 1.2 Fail to Build : portslave didn't get compiled

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> when i try to build DL 1.2, I get an error with portslave ...

Probably why Heiko ask last Sunday if anyone is using portslave.  :-)

The upgrade to the latest version of ppp broke portslave and it doesn't
appear to be maintained any longer.

> De-select it in menuconfig and the build process didn't make any other 
> error ...

Really?  Worked for me.  Did you do a mrproper and start with a fresh
lfsssytem before the compile?

> Is there a relation with the fixes that where done few days ago on pppd ??

Yup!  :-)

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] DL 1.2 Fail to Build : portslave didn't get compiled

[MaNU & S. <ee...@fr...>]

Bruce Smith a =E9crit :

>>when i try to build DL 1.2, I get an error with portslave ...
>>   =20
>>
>
>Probably why Heiko ask last Sunday if anyone is using portslave.  :-)
>
>The upgrade to the latest version of ppp broke portslave and it doesn't
>appear to be maintained any longer.
>
> =20
>
>>De-select it in menuconfig and the build process didn't make any other=20
>>error ...
>>   =20
>>
>
> =20
>
In other words : compile suceeded

>Really?  Worked for me.  Did you do a mrproper and start with a fresh
>lfsssytem before the compile?
>
> =20
>
I use the same lfs from time when 1.0 was about to born ... only the=20
host system was upgraded to SuSE 9.1 ;-) didn't make any mrproper as i=20
freshly cvs the 1.2 branch (never compiled before)

>>Is there a relation with the fixes that where done few days ago on pppd=
 ??
>>   =20
>>
>
>Yup!  :-)
>
> - BS
>
>
> =20
>

Sorry, I (too) quickly search the ML archive before asking ...

I don't know if tacacs+ could substitute to portslave as what I only=20
know is tacacs+ is to interact with Cisco routers ...

anyway I don't use neither cisco nor portslave so ...

CYA

E=B2

>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
>LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D5588&alloc_id=3D12065&op=3Dclick
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>
>
> =20
>


--=20
Emmanuel ESCARABAJAL
Sys-Admin et Logiciels Libres
ee...@fr...

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] DL 1.2 Fail to Build : portslave didn't get compiled

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

> Hi All,
>
> fresh new build env, src download ...
>
> when i try to build DL 1.2, I get an error with portslave ...
>
> ...
>
> creating src/Makefile
> creating extract_and_patch
> make[1]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
> makedepend -Y -f depends *.c 2> /dev/null
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19'
> chmod 755 extract_and_patch
> ./extract_and_patch
> make -C src
> make[2]: Entering directory `/data/1.2/build/tmp/portslave-2002.01.19/src'
> gcc -O2  -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -pedantic
> -I../ppp-2.4.1/pppd  -fPIC -DPIC -c -o libpsr_pic.o libpsr.c
> libpsr.c:15:18: pppd.h: No such file or directory
> libpsr.c:16:17: fsm.h: No such file or directory
> libpsr.c:17:17: lcp.h: No such file or directory
> libpsr.c:18:18: ipcp.h: No such file or directory
> libpsr.c:19:18: cbcp.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from server.h:5,
>                  from libpsr.c:21:
> ../pslave_cfg.h:31:33: ppp-2.4.1/pppd/pppd.h: No such file or directory
>
> ...
>
> De-select it in menuconfig and the build process didn't make any other
> error ...
>
> Is there a relation with the fixes that where done few days ago on pppd ??

Yes.
Portslave doesn't like the new pppd we included. That's the reason why I
posted the question if anybody uses it.

Right now it looks like we're going to de-select it from the default config.

-- 
Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org