Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.04.2004 18:55 MET:
>>Bruce Smith wrote on 22.04.2004 17:55 MET:
>>
>>
>>>Heiko, do you still need this one?
>>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=750035&group_id=34096&atid=410646
>>>
>>>It has a high priority, but it's almost a year old.
>>>
>>>Reading about it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
>>>It lags behind new releases of OpenSSH (there is no patch for current
>>>ssh vers right now), and has only been tested on systems that use PAM.
>>>
>>>Unless you still need it, I recommend we delete that feature request.
>>
>>According to
>> http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/
>>the patch is up to OpenSSH 3.8p1 which is the latest release according to
>>http://www.openssh.org/.
>>
>>If you follow the link "OpenSSH + SecurID HOWTO" to
>>http://www.joerg.cc/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MySecurID-page there is even a
>>reference to possible PAM modules.
>>
>>I don't have a SecurID Card so I can't test it either way.
>>
>
> Leave it in there, this is interesting for corporate environments.
Ok, Bruce, let's say we let the feature-request stay but add a comment
saying that we will only apply it if there is a working pam module, as we
do not want to have some extra dependency for OpenSSH just for that.
Donations like the needed equipment to test the implementation of the whole
SecureID thing would of course speed up the whole process from out side ;-)
--
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________
|
