devil-linux-develop

[Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Howdy folks,

I had to revert  back to busybox 1.0pre3 (again), since it still has 
mount problems. I even tried the current CVS version, but it still the same.

This means Initrd module loading with Kernel 2.6 won't work anymore.

cu
   Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.01.2004 02:48 MET:
> Howdy folks,
> 
> I had to revert  back to busybox 1.0pre3 (again), since it still has 
> mount problems. I even tried the current CVS version, but it still the 
> same.
> 
> This means Initrd module loading with Kernel 2.6 won't work anymore.

Try pre-5. They seem to see pre-releases not as versions that mature
but one where heavy work goes one. So I expect busybox to take a while
to be mature again.


-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.01.2004 02:48 MET:
> 
>> Howdy folks,
>>
>> I had to revert  back to busybox 1.0pre3 (again), since it still has 
>> mount problems. I even tried the current CVS version, but it still the 
>> same.
>>
>> This means Initrd module loading with Kernel 2.6 won't work anymore.
> 
> 
> Try pre-5. They seem to see pre-releases not as versions that mature
> but one where heavy work goes one. So I expect busybox to take a while
> to be mature again.

I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> 
>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.01.2004 02:48 MET:
>>
>>> Howdy folks,
>>>
>>> I had to revert  back to busybox 1.0pre3 (again), since it still has 
>>> mount problems. I even tried the current CVS version, but it still 
>>> the same.
>>>
>>> This means Initrd module loading with Kernel 2.6 won't work anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>> Try pre-5. They seem to see pre-releases not as versions that mature
>> but one where heavy work goes one. So I expect busybox to take a while
>> to be mature again.
> 
> 
> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.

Any details?

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
> 
>> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
>>
>>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 22.01.2004 02:48 MET:
>>>
>>>> Howdy folks,
>>>>
>>>> I had to revert  back to busybox 1.0pre3 (again), since it still has 
>>>> mount problems. I even tried the current CVS version, but it still 
>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>> This means Initrd module loading with Kernel 2.6 won't work anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Try pre-5. They seem to see pre-releases not as versions that mature
>>> but one where heavy work goes one. So I expect busybox to take a while
>>> to be mature again.
>>
>>
>>
>> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.
> 
> 
> Any details?

Once the system is fully booted up, just execute a "mount".
With the versions newer then pre3, you'll see that initrd and all 
sub-mounts didn't get umounted.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:19 MET:
> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> 
>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
>>
>>> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.
>>
>> Any details?
> 
> Once the system is fully booted up, just execute a "mount".
> With the versions newer then pre3, you'll see that initrd and all 
> sub-mounts didn't get umounted.

Can you give me more details, kernel, output of mount, and so one,
so I can report this on the busybox mailinglist.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:19 MET:
> 
>> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
>>
>>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
>>>
>>>> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any details?
>>
>>
>> Once the system is fully booted up, just execute a "mount".
>> With the versions newer then pre3, you'll see that initrd and all 
>> sub-mounts didn't get umounted.
> 
> 
> Can you give me more details, kernel, output of mount, and so one,
> so I can report this on the busybox mailinglist.
> 

The problem is, it's hard to see anything.

The only effect I see is that it's not unmounted, no error message, nothing.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:19 MET:
> 
>> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
>>
>>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
>>>
>>>> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any details?
>>
>>
>> Once the system is fully booted up, just execute a "mount".
>> With the versions newer then pre3, you'll see that initrd and all 
>> sub-mounts didn't get umounted.
> 
> 
> Can you give me more details, kernel, output of mount, and so one,
> so I can report this on the busybox mailinglist.
> 

Oh wait a minute, I know why I don't get an error message.

I'll take another look at it, once I'm finished with lunch.

cu
   Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] busybox

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> 
>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:19 MET:
>>
>>> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
>>>
>>>> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 01.02.2004 18:02 MET:
>>>>
>>>>> I just tested pre6 and it's still not working properly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any details?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Once the system is fully booted up, just execute a "mount".
>>> With the versions newer then pre3, you'll see that initrd and all 
>>> sub-mounts didn't get umounted.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you give me more details, kernel, output of mount, and so one,
>> so I can report this on the busybox mailinglist.
>>
> 
> Oh wait a minute, I know why I don't get an error message.
> 
> I'll take another look at it, once I'm finished with lunch.

Great.... now I can't reproduce the problem.

Whatever, I update to pre6.

Heiko