devil-linux-develop

[Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[<t....@co...>]

If a new package is added to the build, will it get compiled with the gcc stack protector by default? Or does it need to get added to the make file or some script? Also, does grsecurity need anything done to protect the new package? Thanks-

Tim

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

> If a new package is added to the build, will it get compiled with the gcc
> stack protector by default? Or does it need to get added to the make file
> or some script? Also, does grsecurity need anything done to protect the
> new package? Thanks-

It is all enabled by default (depending if you selected it via menuconfig).
When you run into compile problems, first disable ET_DYN (the command for
this is disable_et_dyn) and next would be to disable SSP (which is a bit
more tricky and depends on the package).

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Diego T. <dt...@co...>]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:

> this is disable_et_dyn) and next would be to disable SSP (which is a bit
> more tricky and depends on the package).

does the postfix version of current dl support TLS?
-- 
-- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC  2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799
-- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders.  
Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Diego Torres wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:22:16PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> 
>>this is disable_et_dyn) and next would be to disable SSP (which is a bit
>>more tricky and depends on the package).
> 
> 
> does the postfix version of current dl support TLS?

Yes it does.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Diego T. <dt...@co...>]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:46:06PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> >
> >does the postfix version of current dl support TLS?
> 
> Yes it does.

and mailman? or that is too much? :))

-- 
-- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC  2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799
-- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders.  
Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Diego Torres wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:46:06PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
>>>does the postfix version of current dl support TLS?
>>
>>Yes it does.
> 
> 
> and mailman? or that is too much? :))
> 

nope, no mailman yet.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Diego T. <dt...@co...>]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:36:03PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> >and mailman? or that is too much? :))
> >
> 
> nope, no mailman yet.

2.4.24 works great! :) i've built a couple of tests and now i'm *using* my storage server with the latest dl :)

-- 
-- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC  2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799
-- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders.  
Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España

OT: subject change (was Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?)

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Diego Torres wrote on 08.01.2004 01:09 MET:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:36:03PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
>>>and mailman? or that is too much? :))
>>>
>>
>>nope, no mailman yet.
> 
> 
> 2.4.24 works great! :) i've built a couple of tests and now i'm *using* my storage server with the latest dl :)
> 

Would you guys mind to changing the subject line when when
deviating to far from the original subject of the thread? It
gets quite hard to follow sometimes. Just a thought.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Diego Torres wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 06:36:03PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
>>>and mailman? or that is too much? :))
>>>
>>
>>nope, no mailman yet.
> 
> 
> 2.4.24 works great! :) i've built a couple of tests and now i'm *using* my storage server with the latest dl :)
> 

Cool. Now you just need to get coda running. ;-)

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] new packages and gcc stack smashing protector?

[Diego T. <dt...@co...>]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:16:30PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote:

> >2.4.24 works great! :) i've built a couple of tests and now i'm *using* my 
> >storage server with the latest dl :)
> 
> Cool. Now you just need to get coda running. ;-)

it is next on my todo list :)

-- 
-- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC  2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799
-- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders.  
Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España