devil-linux-develop

[Devil-linux-develop] deleting downloads ?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Hey,

should I delete the 1.0 downloads ?
The iptables "bug" could cause people to turn away from DL before we 
have 1.0.1 out.

cya
  Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] deleting downloads ?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> should I delete the 1.0 downloads ?
> The iptables "bug" could cause people to turn away from DL before we 
> have 1.0.1 out.

Does the bug effect the standard firewall scripts we supply?

If our FW scripts work, then I don't think it's that big of a deal.

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] deleting downloads ?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Bruce Smith wrote:

>>should I delete the 1.0 downloads ?
>>The iptables "bug" could cause people to turn away from DL before we 
>>have 1.0.1 out.
>>    
>>
>
>Does the bug effect the standard firewall scripts we supply?
>
>If our FW scripts work, then I don't think it's that big of a deal.
>  
>
Yes it should, because all "-m something" targets "should" be affected.

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] deleting downloads ?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> >>should I delete the 1.0 downloads ?
> >>The iptables "bug" could cause people to turn away from DL before we 
> >>have 1.0.1 out.
> >
> >Does the bug effect the standard firewall scripts we supply?
> >
> >If our FW scripts work, then I don't think it's that big of a deal.
> >
> Yes it should, because all "-m something" targets "should" be affected.

I've never seen the error before myself, and I just tried the standard
firewall scripts on 1.1/1.2.8-iptables in VMware and didn't see any
errors.  I think it only happens when checking for icmp types (which we
don't do in any of our scripts).

 - BS

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] deleting downloads ?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Bruce Smith wrote:

>>>>should I delete the 1.0 downloads ?
>>>>The iptables "bug" could cause people to turn away from DL before we 
>>>>have 1.0.1 out.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Does the bug effect the standard firewall scripts we supply?
>>>
>>>If our FW scripts work, then I don't think it's that big of a deal.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes it should, because all "-m something" targets "should" be affected.
>>    
>>
>
>I've never seen the error before myself, and I just tried the standard
>firewall scripts on 1.1/1.2.8-iptables in VMware and didn't see any
>errors.  I think it only happens when checking for icmp types (which we
>don't do in any of our scripts).
>  
>
Ok that makes me feel better.
The i486 v1.0.1 is ready, I'll test your new setup in a few minutes.

cya
  Heiko