|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2003-12-09 14:47:39
|
I didn't see this error before, but I'm also not using FreeS/WAN. Just turn off ALG for now. ;-) BUT I just did a few full compiles this week and it compiled fine, no aborts. Did you modify anything ? We have anyway the following task outstanding: either move to SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. Regards Heiko On 12/08/2003 04:29:46 PM Martin Glazer wrote: >I'm using the latest version from CVS and it looks like Freeswan is >failing to >compile correctly - specifically, SHA2 from the ALG patches, which has a >cascade effect and causes pluto to fail compilation. These failures do >not >appear to be picked up during the build or install process. > >I'm using freeswan with all the extra patches > >Is anyone else seeing this? You can check by seeing if /usr/lib/ipsec >contains >the pluto and whack executables. > >Doing a manual compilation I get the following failure... >root:/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99# make programs >make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/libdes' >make[1]: Nothing to be done for `programs'. >make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/libdes' >make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/lib' >make[1]: Nothing to be done for `programs'. >make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/lib' >make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/pluto' >make -C alg libalg.o >make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/pluto/alg' >make -C ../../libcrypto/libsha2 libsha2.a >make[3]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/libcrypto/libsha2' >cc -O3 -omit-frame-pointer -I../include -c -o hmac_sha2.o hmac_sha2.c >cc1: error: unrecognized option `-strip' >cc1: error: output filename specified twice >make[3]: *** [hmac_sha2.o] Error 1 >make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/libcrypto/libsha2' >make[2]: *** [../../libcrypto/libsha2/libsha2.a] Error 2 >make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/pluto/alg' >make[1]: *** [alg/libalg.o] Error 2 >make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/freeswan-1.99/pluto' > >Being the non-programmer that I am, I'm not sure what is causing this >error - >looks like the strip option, but I'm unsure where this is coming from... > >Any help / ideas appreciated. |
|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2003-12-10 13:58:16
|
On 12/09/2003 07:13:30 PM Martin Glazer wrote: >> We have anyway the following task outstanding: either move to >> SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x >> When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. >> > >I haven't worked with FreeS/WAN 2.0x yet, so I'm unsure of all the >changes. >One major difference is the use of a method called OE (Opportunistic >Encryption), which they are promoting heavily, as a method of >automagically >encrypting all traffic between 2 Linux boxes without prearrangement. To >me, >the jury is still out on whether this will actually be adopted by any >other >vendors, but I may be wrong. I'm also unsure of the state of the ALG >patches, >NAT traversal, X509 certs, etc in the official 2 release. > >On the otherhand, I have worked quite extensively with SuperFreeS/WAN, >and so >I would recommend this be the route to follow. It has all the patches >currently in DL now as well as a few others. The DL ipsec patchset is >also >currently a patch or 2 behind. It looks like SuperFreeS/WAN is also >working >on a V2 version, but haven't quite got the official release there yet. I successfully replaced FreeS/WAN with Super-FreeS/WAN and it compiles just fine. I'll check in the updates next week, when I'm back from vacation (probably Sunday). Heiko |
|
From: Martin G. <sou...@gl...> - 2003-12-10 00:13:39
|
On December 9, 2003 07:27 am, hzu...@ra... wrote: > I didn't see this error before, but I'm also not using FreeS/WAN. Just turn > off ALG for now. ;-) I have - it actually only affects ALG-sha2, all the others are OK. I just commented out the appropriate line in the script and deleted the corresponding file. > BUT I just did a few full compiles this week and it compiled fine, no > aborts. Did you modify anything ? > My build (non modified, straight from CVS) also compiles fine with no aborts, even though it fails on sha2 and also a bit later on spi.c (different problem). I was surprised that the whole build didn't fail, but I haven't checked yet why not. See if you have /usr/lib/ipsec/whack or /usr/lib/ipsec/pluto on your resulting build. > We have anyway the following task outstanding: either move to > SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x > When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. > I haven't worked with FreeS/WAN 2.0x yet, so I'm unsure of all the changes. One major difference is the use of a method called OE (Opportunistic Encryption), which they are promoting heavily, as a method of automagically encrypting all traffic between 2 Linux boxes without prearrangement. To me, the jury is still out on whether this will actually be adopted by any other vendors, but I may be wrong. I'm also unsure of the state of the ALG patches, NAT traversal, X509 certs, etc in the official 2 release. On the otherhand, I have worked quite extensively with SuperFreeS/WAN, and so I would recommend this be the route to follow. It has all the patches currently in DL now as well as a few others. The DL ipsec patchset is also currently a patch or 2 behind. It looks like SuperFreeS/WAN is also working on a V2 version, but haven't quite got the official release there yet. Martin |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-12-10 23:59:46
|
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:27:35AM -0500, hzu...@ra... wrote: > SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x > When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. is someone using freeswan? :) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España |
|
From: Martin G. <sou...@gl...> - 2003-12-11 02:57:27
|
On December 10, 2003 04:58 pm, Diego Torres wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:27:35AM -0500, hzu...@ra... wrote: > > SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x > > When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. > > is someone using freeswan? :) I am, if that counts ;-) Martin |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-12-11 12:17:02
|
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:57:30PM -0700, Martin Glazer wrote: > > > SuperFreeS/WAN ( http://www.freeswan.ca ) or to FreeS/WAN 2.0x > > > When I asked last time, nobody answered which one is prefered. > > > > is someone using freeswan? :) > > I am, if that counts ;-) of course it counts! :P -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España |