devil-linux-develop

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] stack-protector?

[<hzu...@ra...>]

On 11/30/2003 06:22:50 PM Diego Torres wrote:
>if [ "$CONFIG_GCC_STACK_PROTECTOR" = "y" ]; then
>FLAGS="CFLAGS_KERNEL=-fno-stack-protector"
>fi
>
>
>i've found this on some script files... is it ok? sounds strange...
>for me this looks better:
>
>if [ "$CONFIG_GCC_STACK_PROTECTOR" != "y" ]; then
>FLAGS="CFLAGS_KERNEL=-fno-stack-protector"
>fi

The protector is enabled for all compiles by default and has to be disabled
for some packages.
So the old stuff is correct, no stack smash protector when GCC got compiled
with it.

clear?

Heiko

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] stack-protector?

[Diego T. <dt...@co...>]

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:18:11PM -0500, hzu...@ra... wrote:
> 
> The protector is enabled for all compiles by default and has to be disabled
> for some packages.
> So the old stuff is correct, no stack smash protector when GCC got compiled
> with it.
> 
> clear?

ok, i now understand :)

-- 
-- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC  2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799
-- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders.  
Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España