Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-07-11 18:20:33
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote on 11.07.2004 18:56 MET: > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 12:41, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: > >>Bruce Smith wrote on 11.07.2004 17:16 MET: >> >> >>>>did anybody hear when the 2.4.27 Kernel comes out? >>>>I want to release 1.2b2 and would like to go with this Kernel..... >>> >>> >>>I see it's at -rc3 now, so hopefully not very much longer. >> >>Will you also release 1.07 with this kernel? > > > No, it's to much work to bring the 1.0x up to a newer Kernel. > But I'm certain that not much work is left to get the 1.2.0 out the door > once the new kernel is available. Ok. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-11 17:01:19
|
On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 12:41, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: > Bruce Smith wrote on 11.07.2004 17:16 MET: > > >>did anybody hear when the 2.4.27 Kernel comes out? > >>I want to release 1.2b2 and would like to go with this Kernel..... > > > > > > I see it's at -rc3 now, so hopefully not very much longer. > > Will you also release 1.07 with this kernel? No, it's to much work to bring the 1.0x up to a newer Kernel. But I'm certain that not much work is left to get the 1.2.0 out the door once the new kernel is available. -- Regards Heiko http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-07-11 16:41:52
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 11.07.2004 17:16 MET: >>did anybody hear when the 2.4.27 Kernel comes out? >>I want to release 1.2b2 and would like to go with this Kernel..... > > > I see it's at -rc3 now, so hopefully not very much longer. Will you also release 1.07 with this kernel? -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-07-11 15:16:11
|
> did anybody hear when the 2.4.27 Kernel comes out? > I want to release 1.2b2 and would like to go with this Kernel..... I see it's at -rc3 now, so hopefully not very much longer. - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-11 13:51:17
|
Hey, did anybody hear when the 2.4.27 Kernel comes out? I want to release 1.2b2 and would like to go with this Kernel..... -- Regards Heiko http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-07 01:36:21
|
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 18:50, Roland Pabel wrote: > On Sunday 27 June 2004 19:09, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > Roland Pabel wrote: > > > On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:02, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>Roland Pabel wrote: > > >>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 21:59, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>>>Roland Pabel wrote: > > >>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 15:47, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>>>>>Roland Pabel wrote: > > >>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:31, Roland Pabel wrote: > > >>>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 10:13, Roland Pabel wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>On Friday 25 June 2004 15:19, Bruce Smith wrote: > > >>> > > >>>[...] > > >>> > > >>>>That's not good... > > >>>>Can you create a modules.dep with the module-init-tools depmod and > > >>>> check if it works ? > > >>>>If yes, then we have to add some checks about the running kernel. > > >>> > > >>>Looks like it's all right after all. I forgot that "depmod -an" dumps > > >>>all /lib/modules/<>/modules.* files in one file. Concatenated all those > > >>>files are exactly the same size as the dumped version. > > >>>The missing option for depmod to work is "-F $CDDIR/boot/System.map". I > > >>>copied that map file to /boot/ which doesn't make depmod happy ... > > >>>maybe we should replace the lfssystem's depmod by a script which calls > > >>>the freshly compiled depmod with the correct options ? or disable it by > > >>>copying /bin/true over it... > > >> > > >>We need a working depmod in the system, so let's move it to be compiled > > >>earlier in the build process and install it into the lfssystem. > > > > > > you need more than that, you need to transparently have depmod called > > > like this: > > > depmod <whatever> => depmod $@ -F $CDDIR/boot/System.map $KERNELVERSION > > > and handle -F arguments and kernel version if given > > > > > >>Are you going to create a patch? > > > > > > can do, but won't be before tuesday > > > > That's OK, I'm doing other stuff anyway and we're waiting for 2.4.27 for > > the next DL beta. > I'm sorry, everything changed quickly... I am too busy now, might not be able > to do anything again for DL in the next 3 months... > Roland Yeah shit happens... I'm actually now proud owner of Kernel 2.6 system (Fedora Core 2), so I should be able to work on this problem too. Heiko |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-07-06 22:50:23
|
On Sunday 27 June 2004 19:09, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Roland Pabel wrote: > > On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:02, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>Roland Pabel wrote: > >>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 21:59, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>>>Roland Pabel wrote: > >>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 15:47, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>>>>>Roland Pabel wrote: > >>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:31, Roland Pabel wrote: > >>>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 10:13, Roland Pabel wrote: > >>>>>>>>>On Friday 25 June 2004 15:19, Bruce Smith wrote: > >>> > >>>[...] > >>> > >>>>That's not good... > >>>>Can you create a modules.dep with the module-init-tools depmod and > >>>> check if it works ? > >>>>If yes, then we have to add some checks about the running kernel. > >>> > >>>Looks like it's all right after all. I forgot that "depmod -an" dumps > >>>all /lib/modules/<>/modules.* files in one file. Concatenated all those > >>>files are exactly the same size as the dumped version. > >>>The missing option for depmod to work is "-F $CDDIR/boot/System.map". I > >>>copied that map file to /boot/ which doesn't make depmod happy ... > >>>maybe we should replace the lfssystem's depmod by a script which calls > >>>the freshly compiled depmod with the correct options ? or disable it by > >>>copying /bin/true over it... > >> > >>We need a working depmod in the system, so let's move it to be compiled > >>earlier in the build process and install it into the lfssystem. > > > > you need more than that, you need to transparently have depmod called > > like this: > > depmod <whatever> => depmod $@ -F $CDDIR/boot/System.map $KERNELVERSION > > and handle -F arguments and kernel version if given > > > >>Are you going to create a patch? > > > > can do, but won't be before tuesday > > That's OK, I'm doing other stuff anyway and we're waiting for 2.4.27 for > the next DL beta. I'm sorry, everything changed quickly... I am too busy now, might not be able to do anything again for DL in the next 3 months... Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-07-02 15:08:36
|
> >> >> >> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 > >> >> > > >> >> > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) > >> >> > >> >> Nope > >> > > >> > Bummer... :-( > >> > > >> >> But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 > >> >> support it works fine. ;-) > >> > > >> > Are you saying that trapdoor2 doesn't work with the 2.6 kernel? > >> > > >> > Or are you saying that 2.6 in DL is generally hosed? > >> > >> Nope. > >> I'm just saying that the Kernel 2.6 compile in DL is currently not > >> working > >> too reliable. > > > > We should fix that before 1.4 comes out! ;-) > > U think ? So when I now decide we don't come out with 1.4, but call the > next release 2.0... then we don't have to fix it, correct? Sure, if we're using the 2.8 kernel by then. ;-) > (Somebody seems to be in an awefully good mood today....) My boss is gone today, so I'm catching up on the stack of Linux Journal mags I haven't had a chance to read yet! :-) - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-02 15:01:20
|
>> >> >> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 >> >> > >> >> > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) >> >> >> >> Nope >> > >> > Bummer... :-( >> > >> >> But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 >> >> support it works fine. ;-) >> > >> > Are you saying that trapdoor2 doesn't work with the 2.6 kernel? >> > >> > Or are you saying that 2.6 in DL is generally hosed? >> >> Nope. >> I'm just saying that the Kernel 2.6 compile in DL is currently not >> working >> too reliable. > > We should fix that before 1.4 comes out! ;-) U think ? So when I now decide we don't come out with 1.4, but call the next release 2.0... then we don't have to fix it, correct? (Somebody seems to be in an awefully good mood today....) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-07-02 14:39:12
|
> >> >> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 > >> > > >> > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) > >> > >> Nope > > > > Bummer... :-( > > > >> But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 > >> support it works fine. ;-) > > > > Are you saying that trapdoor2 doesn't work with the 2.6 kernel? > > > > Or are you saying that 2.6 in DL is generally hosed? > > Nope. > I'm just saying that the Kernel 2.6 compile in DL is currently not working > too reliable. We should fix that before 1.4 comes out! ;-) - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-02 14:31:18
|
>> >> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 >> > >> > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) >> >> Nope > > Bummer... :-( > >> But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 >> support it works fine. ;-) > > Are you saying that trapdoor2 doesn't work with the 2.6 kernel? > > Or are you saying that 2.6 in DL is generally hosed? Nope. I'm just saying that the Kernel 2.6 compile in DL is currently not working too reliable. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-07-02 14:18:43
|
> >> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 > > > > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) > > Nope Bummer... :-( > But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 > support it works fine. ;-) Are you saying that trapdoor2 doesn't work with the 2.6 kernel? Or are you saying that 2.6 in DL is generally hosed? - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-02 14:06:20
|
>> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 > > I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) Nope But you can add it to 1.3. As long as you compile 1.3 with Kernel 2.4 support it works fine. ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-07-02 13:34:54
|
> sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 I want it!!! In time for 1.2? :-) - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-02 13:26:21
|
sounds interesting: http://freshmeat.net/projects/trapdoor2 -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-07-02 01:46:20
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > Hi, > except for mounting usbdevfs for kernel 2.4 (which seems to be unnecessary for > 2.6), this patch is cosmetic stuff only. boot now prints out which special > filesystems are mounted and clamav prints success if database was updated or > is up-to-date. > Will address the depmod issue next... > Roland > DONE Heiko |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-07-01 22:51:44
|
Hi, except for mounting usbdevfs for kernel 2.4 (which seems to be unnecessary for 2.6), this patch is cosmetic stuff only. boot now prints out which special filesystems are mounted and clamav prints success if database was updated or is up-to-date. Will address the depmod issue next... Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Serge L. <se...@nn...> - 2004-07-01 06:59:32
|
Dear Heiko, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:19:24 PM, you wrote: HZ> There was a problem in the perl build script, I backported the 1.3 version. HZ> I have a test compile running, but it should work now. Thank you! It's all right now. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:se...@nn... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-06-30 13:31:17
|
> unless there is some greater meaning to MYNAME=USBUTILS Damned copy'n'paste. ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-06-30 13:21:20
|
OOOPS ;-) There was a problem in the perl build script, I backported the 1.3 version. I have a test compile running, but it should work now. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <se...@nn...> - 2004-06-30 12:43:41
|
Dear Heiko, Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 6:59:27 PM, you wrote: HZ> are you using 1.3 or the 1.2 branch ? I'm using 1.2 HZ> The changes are currently only in 1.3, until I'm sure everything works as HZ> expected. Hm... I wrote in my previous message that I can build iso and load it. So, later I decided to remove some packages (lm_sensor, watchdog) because I don't use them. I've done: cd ./lfssystem cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux login cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux co -r rel-1-2-patches build cd ./lfssystem/build/ cvs update -d -P ./update_src chroot ..... And after this I try to recreate iso. make menuconfig make build make install make prepare make iso HZ> Sometimes it's just best to start over with a mrproper and let it run over HZ> night.... Ok. I'll do mrproper and try again... It done. The same result. HZ> You can ignore this error. Should I do "touch /build/tmp/.done_install_perl" and run "make install" again? I've done this but is this way correct? Because I could create iso but there is no perl there. but I need it. 8-( -- Best regards, Serge mailto:se...@nn... |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-06-30 12:34:08
|
unless there is some greater meaning to MYNAME=USBUTILS Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-06-29 15:01:18
|
Hey, are you using 1.3 or the 1.2 branch ? The changes are currently only in 1.3, until I'm sure everything works as expected. Sometimes it's just best to start over with a mrproper and let it run over night.... > Saturday, June 26, 2004, 2:39:16 AM, you wrote: > > HZ> I just did a few changes to the perl script, this will require that > you > HZ> a) do a "make mrproper" > HZ> b) delete tmp/perl-5.* and unpack the perl tarball again > HZ> don't forgett to run a: scripts/build.sh build opt=perl > I have some problem with new perl. I've done all you write. > So, "make build" was without any troubles. But "make install" finished > with message: >>executing perl with option install (in /build/tmp/perl-5.8.4) >>ERROR >>/build/scripts/perl install failed >>check log file /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl for details >>make: *** [install] Error 1 > > The /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl is quite large and I send only > error strings: >> root:/build# grep -A 3 -B 3 "Error" /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' >> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' >> make[2]: [extras.make] Error 1 (ignored) >> >> Everything is up to date. Type 'make test' to run test suite. >> if [ -n "" ]; \ >> -- >> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' >> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' >> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' >> make[3]: [extras.install] Error 1 (ignored) >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4' >> ./perl installman --destdir= >> WARNING: You've never run 'make test'!!! (Installing anyway.) > > What should I do to avoid such error ? You can ignore this error. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <se...@nn...> - 2004-06-29 14:38:21
|
Dear Heiko, Saturday, June 26, 2004, 2:39:16 AM, you wrote: HZ> I just did a few changes to the perl script, this will require that you HZ> a) do a "make mrproper" HZ> b) delete tmp/perl-5.* and unpack the perl tarball again HZ> don't forgett to run a: scripts/build.sh build opt=perl I have some problem with new perl. I've done all you write. So, "make build" was without any troubles. But "make install" finished with message: >executing perl with option install (in /build/tmp/perl-5.8.4) >ERROR >/build/scripts/perl install failed >check log file /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl for details >make: *** [install] Error 1 The /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl is quite large and I send only error strings: > root:/build# grep -A 3 -B 3 "Error" /build/tmp/LOGS/install/perl > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/perl-ldap-0.2701' > make[2]: [extras.make] Error 1 (ignored) > > Everything is up to date. Type 'make test' to run test suite. > if [ -n "" ]; \ > -- > make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' > make[4]: Entering directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' > make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4/ext/DynaLoader' > make[3]: [extras.install] Error 1 (ignored) > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/tmp/perl-5.8.4' > ./perl installman --destdir= > WARNING: You've never run 'make test'!!! (Installing anyway.) What should I do to avoid such error ? -- Best regards, Serge mailto:se...@nn... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-06-27 17:11:23
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:02, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>Roland Pabel wrote: >> >>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 21:59, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> >>>>Roland Pabel wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 15:47, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Roland Pabel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:31, Roland Pabel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Saturday 26 June 2004 10:13, Roland Pabel wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Friday 25 June 2004 15:19, Bruce Smith wrote: >>> >>>[...] >>> >>> >>>>That's not good... >>>>Can you create a modules.dep with the module-init-tools depmod and check >>>>if it works ? >>>>If yes, then we have to add some checks about the running kernel. >>> >>>Looks like it's all right after all. I forgot that "depmod -an" dumps >>>all /lib/modules/<>/modules.* files in one file. Concatenated all those >>>files are exactly the same size as the dumped version. >>>The missing option for depmod to work is "-F $CDDIR/boot/System.map". I >>>copied that map file to /boot/ which doesn't make depmod happy ... >>>maybe we should replace the lfssystem's depmod by a script which calls >>>the freshly compiled depmod with the correct options ? or disable it by >>>copying /bin/true over it... >> >>We need a working depmod in the system, so let's move it to be compiled >>earlier in the build process and install it into the lfssystem. > > you need more than that, you need to transparently have depmod called like > this: > depmod <whatever> => depmod $@ -F $CDDIR/boot/System.map $KERNELVERSION > and handle -F arguments and kernel version if given > > >>Are you going to create a patch? > > can do, but won't be before tuesday That's OK, I'm doing other stuff anyway and we're waiting for 2.4.27 for the next DL beta. Heiko |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
