Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-22 16:05:53
|
Hello DL Community! I'm happy to announce that the third release candidate of Devil-Linux 1.6 is now available for download. This release brings the Linux kernel 3.2.11, fixes to reported issues, and many other updates. Please read the changelog for details. Please support the project and donate. Every little bit helps! http://www.devil-linux.org/sitetools/donatedl.php Report any new bugs or submit patches here: http://www.devil-linux.org/support/bugs.php -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-22 16:05:52
|
Hello DL Community! I'm happy to announce that the third release candidate of Devil-Linux 1.6 is now available for download. This release brings the Linux kernel 3.2.11, fixes to reported issues, and many other updates. Please read the changelog for details. Please support the project and donate. Every little bit helps! http://www.devil-linux.org/sitetools/donatedl.php Report any new bugs or submit patches here: http://www.devil-linux.org/support/bugs.php -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-17 14:36:18
|
Stefan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Engel [mailto:ma...@en...]
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 6:58 AM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: [Devil-linux-develop] DL compile: some settings missing in kernel
> config?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a small problem when trying to build DL from scratch (I am building
for
> x86_64). The build process stops in scripts/prepare when configuring the
> kernel.
>
> I have set up a fresh build environment and checked out the current HEAD
> revision from CVS without making any additional changes to the build
> infrastructure (except removing some unneeded applications during 'make
> menuconfig').
>
> make unpack, make menuconfig and make prepare are running without any
> problems.
>
> But when I run 'make build' then the first target (scripts/prepare) fails
when
> executing 'make oldconfig'.
>
> The last info in tmp/LOGS/build/prepare is:
>
> <<<snip>>>
> `/data/build/scripts/config/linux-3.x/config_linux.x86_64' ->
> `/data/build/tmp/linux-3.2/.config'
> ...
> executing set_all_kernel_options in drivers/hwmon ...
> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
> .config:4108:warning: override: reassigning to symbol DEBUG_KERNEL ...
> *
> * Restart config...
> *
> *
> * Configure standard kernel features (expert users)
> *
> Configure standard kernel features (expert users) (EXPERT) [N/y/?] n
> Load all symbols for debugging/ksymoops (KALLSYMS) [Y/?] y
> Include all symbols in kallsyms (KALLSYMS_ALL) [N/y/?] (NEW)
<<<snip>>>
>
> So the base config file gets copied to tmp/linux-3.2/.config and then gets
> further patched by scripts/prepare. But something seems to be missing
here.
>
> If I manually run 'make oldconfig' in tmp/linux-3.2 then I have to step
through
> some additional config settings to get a valid kernel config file.
> KALLSYMS_ALL is only the first undefined setting.
>
> Using 'find . -type f -exec grep KALLSYMS_ALL {} \;' in /data/build after
make
> unpack && make prepare results only in hits in tmp/linux-3.2
> (documentation, default configs in 'arch'). So the missing config settings
do
> not come from any files/scripts in the DL source tree.
>
> I don't want to enable the line '(yes "" | make oldconfig)' in
scripts/prepare,
> because a lot of stuff gets enabled which I do not need/want (debugging,
> ...).
>
>
> So my question is: am I doing something wrong here? Or what kind of linux
> kernel config files are you using for building DL from scratch?
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
It should run right through.
Can you email me your DL .config file? Send it to my directly, not the
mailinglist.
I'll see if I can reproduce your problem.
--
Regards
Heiko Zuerker
http://www.devil-linux.org
|
|
From: Stefan E. <ma...@en...> - 2012-03-16 11:58:01
|
Hi,
I have a small problem when trying to build DL from scratch (I am
building for x86_64). The build process stops in scripts/prepare when
configuring the kernel.
I have set up a fresh build environment and checked out the current HEAD
revision from CVS without making any additional changes to the build
infrastructure (except removing some unneeded applications during 'make
menuconfig').
make unpack, make menuconfig and make prepare are running without any
problems.
But when I run 'make build' then the first target (scripts/prepare)
fails when executing 'make oldconfig'.
The last info in tmp/LOGS/build/prepare is:
<<<snip>>>
`/data/build/scripts/config/linux-3.x/config_linux.x86_64' ->
`/data/build/tmp/linux-3.2/.config'
...
executing set_all_kernel_options in drivers/hwmon
...
scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
.config:4108:warning: override: reassigning to symbol DEBUG_KERNEL
...
*
* Restart config...
*
*
* Configure standard kernel features (expert users)
*
Configure standard kernel features (expert users) (EXPERT) [N/y/?] n
Load all symbols for debugging/ksymoops (KALLSYMS) [Y/?] y
Include all symbols in kallsyms (KALLSYMS_ALL) [N/y/?] (NEW)
<<<snip>>>
So the base config file gets copied to tmp/linux-3.2/.config and then
gets further patched by scripts/prepare. But something seems to be
missing here.
If I manually run 'make oldconfig' in tmp/linux-3.2 then I have to step
through some additional config settings to get a valid kernel config
file. KALLSYMS_ALL is only the first undefined setting.
Using 'find . -type f -exec grep KALLSYMS_ALL {} \;' in /data/build
after make unpack && make prepare results only in hits in tmp/linux-3.2
(documentation, default configs in 'arch'). So the missing config
settings do not come from any files/scripts in the DL source tree.
I don't want to enable the line '(yes "" | make oldconfig)' in
scripts/prepare, because a lot of stuff gets enabled which I do not
need/want (debugging, ...).
So my question is: am I doing something wrong here? Or what kind of
linux kernel config files are you using for building DL from scratch?
Any help would be much appreciated.
Best regards,
Stefan
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-13 13:58:55
|
Andrzej, Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > I wrote: >> As I wrote, Console messages I sent just in case. As I mentioned at >> the end, I >> suspected that your patch fixes the problem. Now I'm building a new version. >> >> I'll let you know when I'll check the result. > > I tested new build last night. Now all interfaces was present and worked > properly (in a short period of time, because after hour I reverted soft to > 32-bit). > > But in real environment under 64-bit worked correct: > > -- dhcpd > -- dnscache > -- tinydns > -- axfrdns > -- ntpd > -- arpwatch > -- sshd > -- openvpn with severe static tunnels > -- zebra and bgpd > -- vsftpd > > Only ntop did not start, maybe because of databases incompatibility. This is > for check in my virtual environment. Thanks for the testing! I'm only aware of 2 other issues, one is that mysql doesn't start after the boot (have to analyze it) and the other one that install-on-usb doesn't support grub2. I'm only intending to fix the mysql issue (don't have enough time for the install-on-usb), then I'll release RC3 or maybe even name it 1.6. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-13 13:28:11
|
I wrote: > As I wrote, Console messages I sent just in case. As I mentioned at the end, I > suspected that your patch fixes the problem. Now I'm building a new version. > > I'll let you know when I'll check the result. I tested new build last night. Now all interfaces was present and worked properly (in a short period of time, because after hour I reverted soft to 32-bit). But in real environment under 64-bit worked correct: -- dhcpd -- dnscache -- tinydns -- axfrdns -- ntpd -- arpwatch -- sshd -- openvpn with severe static tunnels -- zebra and bgpd -- vsftpd Only ntop did not start, maybe because of databases incompatibility. This is for check in my virtual environment. Best Regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-12 14:06:34
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > the errors you're seeing are caused by a bug in the "finalize" script. > Update from CVS and a simple "make clean all" should generate you an > ISO which works correctly. Heiko, As I wrote, Console messages I sent just in case. As I mentioned at the end, I suspected that your patch fixes the problem. Now I'm building a new version. I'll let you know when I'll check the result. Best regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-12 13:13:36
|
Andrzej, the errors you're seeing are caused by a bug in the "finalize" script. Update from CVS and a simple "make clean all" should generate you an ISO which works correctly. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-12 02:36:34
|
Serge Leschinsky wrote:
> Andrzej,
>
> On 03/09/2012 04:52 AM, Andrzej Odyniec wrote:
>
>>But next 64-bit compilation with new udev was not booted correctly. Ie. there
>>was no network interfaces. We need test and maybe reconfigure this udev. I'll
>>try this in testing environment next week.
>
> Can you please check kernel messages? Do you have a message abt wrong module
> capabilities (SYS_CAP) for the module ?
Serge,
I'm not so fast, because my hardware copy of my router is unfortunatelly
broken from some days. So I can test it only in night and not every. My last
try was on last night. There are console messages:
First compilation with new udev:
> Version 1.6.0-RC3-2012-03-08
> Kernel 3.2.9-grsec
>
> INIT: version 2.88 booting
>
> [ OK ]
> Creating devices in /dev
> udevd[570]: NAME="%k" is ignored, because it breaks kernel supplied names, please remove it from /etc/udev/rules.d/60-aoe.rules:26
> udevd[570]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:9
> udevd[570]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:13
> udevd[570]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage-tape.rules:15
> udevd[570]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/79-fstab_import.rules:1
> udevd[570]: unknown key 'RUN{ignore_error}' in /lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5
> udevd[570]: invalid rule '/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5'
> [ OK ]
> Sync'ing filesystems[ OK ]
>
>
Last compilation with ACPI dev switched off in kernel config (before Heiko bug
patch):
> Version 1.6.0-RC3-2012-03-10
> Kernel 3.2.9-grsec
>
> INIT: version 2.88 booting
>
> [ OK ]
> Creating devices in /dev
> udevd[558]: NAME="%k" is ignored, because it breaks kernel supplied names, please remove it from /etc/udev/rules.d/60-aoe.rules:26
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:9
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:13
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage-tape.rules:15
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/79-fstab_import.rules:1
> udevd[558]: unknown key 'RUN{ignore_error}' in /lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5
> udevd[558]: invalid rule '/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5'
> [ OK ]
> Sync'ing filesystems[ OK ]
Above but after removing rules from /shm/etc-mods/udev/rules.d:
> Version 1.6.0-RC3-2012-03-10
> Kernel 3.2.9-grsec
>
> INIT: version 2.88 booting
>
> [ OK ]
> Creating devices in /dev
> udevd[556]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:9
> udevd[556]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:13
> udevd[556]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage-tape.rules:15
> udevd[556]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/79-fstab_import.rules:1
> udevd[556]: unknown key 'RUN{ignore_error}' in /lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5
> udevd[556]: invalid rule '/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5'
> [ OK ]
> Sync'ing filesystems[ OK ]
Above, but after removing all rules from /etc/udev/rules.d:
> Version 1.6.0-RC3-2012-03-10
> Kernel 3.2.9-grsec
>
>
> INIT: version 2.88 booting
>
> [ OK ]
> Creating devices in /dev
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:9
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-serial.rules:13
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage-tape.rules:15
> udevd[558]: IMPORT{} type missing, ignoring IMPORT /lib/udev/rules.d/79-fstab_import.rules:1
> udevd[558]: unknown key 'RUN{ignore_error}' in /lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5
> udevd[558]: invalid rule '/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5'
> [ OK ]
> Sync'ing filesystems[ OK ]
Ofcourse, in all above boots after complete boot there is no ethernet
interfaces, only lo and ifb's. Probably Heiko corrected this problem, but I
can build last CVS on monday afternoon. I will try to change Power supply in
my testing hardware. If this is the only problem, I will try faster, because I
will test in middle of day.
Regards
--
Andrzej Odyniec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-11 19:35:25
|
Patch has been applied. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Leschinsky [mailto:ser...@gm...] > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:58 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] In 64-bit DL OpenVPN is not working > > Heiko, > > please try this patch (I tested it on my machine, it seems to be correct). > > Serge > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-11 19:24:06
|
Hey, I found a bug in the build system and fixed it. Try again with the latest code from CVS. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-10 23:25:46
|
> I'm testing on vmware and the devices show up fine. If I get a chance I'll test > on real hardware this weekend. The network devices show up on my physical hardware too. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-09 17:00:59
|
Andrzej, On 03/09/2012 04:52 AM, Andrzej Odyniec wrote: > But next 64-bit compilation with new udev was not booted correctly. Ie. there > was no network interfaces. We need test and maybe reconfigure this udev. I'll > try this in testing environment next week. > Can you please check kernel messages? Do you have a message abt wrong module capabilities (SYS_CAP) for the module ? Serge |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-09 16:58:26
|
Heiko, please try this patch (I tested it on my machine, it seems to be correct). Serge |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-09 14:28:21
|
Andrzej, Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in >> the repo :( >> I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... >> The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it >> without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful >> verification than I can. > > So... last night I tested this in real conditions. After 64-bit recompilation > of OpenVPN with correct path to iproute all my 15 static tunnels and > 2 servers > are working correct connecting with different clients on different machines. > So probably this issue is solved. > > But next 64-bit compilation with new udev was not booted correctly. Ie. there > was no network interfaces. We need test and maybe reconfigure this udev. I'll > try this in testing environment next week. Check if there are any files in /etc/udev/rules.d , other than the aoe one. This may be causing issues. I'm testing on vmware and the devices show up fine. If I get a chance I'll test on real hardware this weekend. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-09 12:52:48
|
Hi, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in the repo :( > I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... > The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it > without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful > verification than I can. So... last night I tested this in real conditions. After 64-bit recompilation of OpenVPN with correct path to iproute all my 15 static tunnels and 2 servers are working correct connecting with different clients on different machines. So probably this issue is solved. But next 64-bit compilation with new udev was not booted correctly. Ie. there was no network interfaces. We need test and maybe reconfigure this udev. I'll try this in testing environment next week. Regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-08 14:20:55
|
Serge, I like your approach with using a very clean lfssystem, with the bare minimum required. I'll document it in Mantis. Unfortunately creating new clean lfssystems is a pain in the a$$ and takes a lot of time... Heiko Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>: > That's would be great. However, it's not only for iproute2 - there are more > tools/libs which might be used from "incorrect" places. I don't remember if I > mentioned, but I made initial lfssystem completely empty to avoid > mixing "olg" > and "new" binaries. There is no chance to include "old" tool into > the resulting > image or, which is worse, link something with "old" library. I believe it's a > major feature :) > > I'd suggest uploading everything I have to sourcesforge, but I'm > afraid it might > confuse users - I significantly modified init scripts and added new > functionality which is not documented (like multi boot environments). The > toolchain and packages are also not completely aligned... Due to > some business > specific, those changes are critical for me and I cannot just switch to DL_64 > Anyway, I'll be happy to share this work. > > Serge > > On 03/07/2012 12:31 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Should we change our iproute2 package to actually install all the >> binaries into the build system and remove the old version from the >> "wrong" directories? >> >> Heiko >> >> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: >> >>> Heiko, >>> >>> No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in >>> the repo :( >>> I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... >>> The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it >>> without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful >>> verification than I can. >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> >>> On 03/07/2012 10:41 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>>> Serge, >>>> >>>> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: >>>> >>>>> yes, you are right. I use the following config line: >>>>> >>>>> ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc >>>>> --localstatedir=/var >>>>> --enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \ >>>>> --with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig >>>>> --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip >>>>> --with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1 >>>> >>>> Would you mind merging your changes with what we have in CVS? >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning >>> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing >>> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. >>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-07 21:01:15
|
That's would be great. However, it's not only for iproute2 - there are more tools/libs which might be used from "incorrect" places. I don't remember if I mentioned, but I made initial lfssystem completely empty to avoid mixing "olg" and "new" binaries. There is no chance to include "old" tool into the resulting image or, which is worse, link something with "old" library. I believe it's a major feature :) I'd suggest uploading everything I have to sourcesforge, but I'm afraid it might confuse users - I significantly modified init scripts and added new functionality which is not documented (like multi boot environments). The toolchain and packages are also not completely aligned... Due to some business specific, those changes are critical for me and I cannot just switch to DL_64 Anyway, I'll be happy to share this work. Serge On 03/07/2012 12:31 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Should we change our iproute2 package to actually install all the > binaries into the build system and remove the old version from the > "wrong" directories? > > Heiko > > Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: > >> Heiko, >> >> No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in >> the repo :( >> I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... >> The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it >> without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful >> verification than I can. >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 03/07/2012 10:41 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> Serge, >>> >>> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: >>> >>>> yes, you are right. I use the following config line: >>>> >>>> ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc >>>> --localstatedir=/var >>>> --enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \ >>>> --with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig >>>> --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip >>>> --with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1 >>> >>> Would you mind merging your changes with what we have in CVS? >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning >> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing >> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-07 20:31:32
|
Should we change our iproute2 package to actually install all the binaries into the build system and remove the old version from the "wrong" directories? Heiko Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>: > Heiko, > > No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in > the repo :( > I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... > The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it > without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful > verification than I can. > > Serge > > > On 03/07/2012 10:41 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Serge, >> >> Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: >> >>> yes, you are right. I use the following config line: >>> >>> ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc >>> --localstatedir=/var >>> --enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \ >>> --with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig >>> --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip >>> --with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1 >> >> Would you mind merging your changes with what we have in CVS? >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-07 20:22:10
|
Heiko, No problem, but I tried with udev and it caused nonworking code in the repo :( I need to test the changes in DL (at least 64) before merging... The case with OpenVPN seems to be more simple though. I'll try to send it without the verification - I believe Andrzej will do more thoughtful verification than I can. Serge On 03/07/2012 10:41 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Serge, > > Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: > >> yes, you are right. I use the following config line: >> >> ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var >> --enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \ >> --with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip >> --with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1 > > Would you mind merging your changes with what we have in CVS? > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-07 18:41:39
|
Serge, Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>: > yes, you are right. I use the following config line: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var > --enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \ > --with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip > --with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1 Would you mind merging your changes with what we have in CVS? -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-07 17:05:17
|
yes, you are right. I use the following config line:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var
--enable-password-save --enable-iproute2 --disable-selinux \
--with-ifconfig-path=/sbin/ifconfig --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip
--with-route-path=/sbin/route || exit 1
Serge
On 03/07/2012 05:08 AM, Andrzej Odyniec wrote:
> Dear Heiko,
>
> Next surprise: tonight I tried the router with the new, 64-bit version, and no
> OpenVPN tunnel was set up. Meanwhile, a parallel 32-bit negotiates tunnels
> with no problem. Records in log are:
>
>> Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: /usr/sbin/ip link set dev tun2 up mtu 1500
>> Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: Linux ip link set failed: could not execute external program
>> Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: Exiting
>
> Meanwhile, 32-bit version uses path /sbin/ip to iproute and this is ok.
> Probably ./configure assumes different paths for different architectures after
> --enable-iproute2 so I try now with enforcing path using
> --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip
>
> I will report, about solving or not this problem.
>
> Best Regards
>
|
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-07 13:21:17
|
Dear Heiko, Next surprise: tonight I tried the router with the new, 64-bit version, and no OpenVPN tunnel was set up. Meanwhile, a parallel 32-bit negotiates tunnels with no problem. Records in log are: > Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: /usr/sbin/ip link set dev tun2 up mtu 1500 > Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: Linux ip link set failed: could not execute external program > Mar 7 03:27:07 src@Gibraltar tls-47-05-server[4371]: Exiting Meanwhile, 32-bit version uses path /sbin/ip to iproute and this is ok. Probably ./configure assumes different paths for different architectures after --enable-iproute2 so I try now with enforcing path using --with-iproute-path=/sbin/ip I will report, about solving or not this problem. Best Regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2012-03-06 19:52:18
|
Andrzej, both of your patches have been added. Thanks for the contribution. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-06 19:35:40
|
Hmm... It looks like the difference in build environments is critical already. I does work for me, but I didn't check in in DL. It's my fault. Serge On 03/06/2012 05:21 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > *Moved email to developer mailinglist* > > Serge, > > Quoting Serge Leschinsky<ser...@gm...>: >> I have a working udev-173. It seems to be the last "old" udev (no mandatory >> /run, do devfs, no kmod etc) - if you don't mind I'll update DL to >> this version. > > The udev compile is failing with: > > CC extras/gudev/extras_gudev_libgudev_1_0_la-gudevclient.lo > CC extras/gudev/extras_gudev_libgudev_1_0_la-gudevdevice.lo > libudev/libudev-enumerate.c: In function 'udev_enumerate_scan_subsystems': > libudev/libudev-enumerate.c:924: internal compiler error: in > partition_view_bitmap, at tree-ssa-live.c:369 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > make[2]: *** [libudev/libudev-enumerate.lo] Error 1 > > Happens on x86_64 and on i686 (this one with a fresh lfssystem). > |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.