Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-02 20:54:12
|
>> > A fresh (mrproper) compile hangs during make prepare, asking: >> > >> > MAC system integration (none, direct, hook) [none] (NEW) >> >> I just ran one this night and it worked fine... >> >> The fix is actually in CVS, but that one is at least 1 week old. > > Nope, I updated from CVS this morning (and again now to make sure - > nothing new was downloaded). The real CVS server, not the mirror. :-) > > mrproper and new lfssystem too. I've tried it 3 times so far with the > same results, once on kernel 2.6, and twice on kernel 2.4. > > Maybe it's the combinations of selections (menuconfig) I have? I just verified it and I actually forgott to update the file config_pax for the 2.4 kernel. I updated it in CVS and it should work now. Sorry for that -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-03-02 20:26:33
|
> > A fresh (mrproper) compile hangs during make prepare, asking: > > > > MAC system integration (none, direct, hook) [none] (NEW) > > I just ran one this night and it worked fine... > > The fix is actually in CVS, but that one is at least 1 week old. Nope, I updated from CVS this morning (and again now to make sure - nothing new was downloaded). The real CVS server, not the mirror. :-) mrproper and new lfssystem too. I've tried it 3 times so far with the same results, once on kernel 2.6, and twice on kernel 2.4. Maybe it's the combinations of selections (menuconfig) I have? - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-02 20:17:41
|
> A fresh (mrproper) compile hangs during make prepare, asking: > > MAC system integration (none, direct, hook) [none] (NEW) I just ran one this night and it worked fine... The fix is actually in CVS, but that one is at least 1 week old. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-03-02 19:50:15
|
A fresh (mrproper) compile hangs during make prepare, asking: MAC system integration (none, direct, hook) [none] (NEW) - BS |
|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2004-03-02 16:30:52
|
On 03/02/2004 10:02:43 AM Bruce Smith wrote: >> > According to slashdot, "KAME" was selected as the standard Linux >IPSEC >> > implementation. Does anyone have any experience with KAME? (I've >never >> > even heard of it myself) Maybe we should think about switching DL >to >> > include KAME instead of FreeS/WAN? >> >> KAME/racoon is already in the tree but working >> only witha a 2.6 kernel... >> >> there exists a backport of the ipsec-infrastructure for 2.4, if you >> look in the redhat kernels, but i never tried to patch a vanilla 2.4 >> >> i would rather suggest >> >> 2.4 = freeswan (until a maintained 2.6 ipsec backport is available) >> 2.6 = KAME/racoon DL v1.2 will be a "2.4 only" release. The 2.6 support is only for testing and folks who really need it (and they need to compile it themselves). I think after that all the patches and other programs should be working under 2.6 and then we can get ready for a 2.0 release of DL with Kernel 2.6. >I guess it also depends if the next stable release will be 2.6 only, or >a choice of 2.4/2.6. > >> i've only played with racoon, but its easy to configure and there >exists >> a good how-to on the web for it. >> >> http://www.ipsec-howto.org/ > >An IPSEC implementation that is easy to configure? >Isn't that an oxymoron? ;-) LOL Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-03-02 15:15:34
|
> > According to slashdot, "KAME" was selected as the standard Linux IPSEC > > implementation. Does anyone have any experience with KAME? (I've never > > even heard of it myself) Maybe we should think about switching DL to > > include KAME instead of FreeS/WAN? > > KAME/racoon is already in the tree but working > only witha a 2.6 kernel... > > there exists a backport of the ipsec-infrastructure for 2.4, if you > look in the redhat kernels, but i never tried to patch a vanilla 2.4 > > i would rather suggest > > 2.4 = freeswan (until a maintained 2.6 ipsec backport is available) > 2.6 = KAME/racoon I guess it also depends if the next stable release will be 2.6 only, or a choice of 2.4/2.6. > i've only played with racoon, but its easy to configure and there exists > a good how-to on the web for it. > > http://www.ipsec-howto.org/ An IPSEC implementation that is easy to configure? Isn't that an oxymoron? ;-) - BS |
|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-03-02 14:53:30
|
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 15:12, Bruce Smith wrote: > According to slashdot, "KAME" was selected as the standard Linux IPSEC > implementation. Does anyone have any experience with KAME? (I've never > even heard of it myself) Maybe we should think about switching DL to > include KAME instead of FreeS/WAN? > KAME/racoon is already in the tree but working only witha a 2.6 kernel... there exists a backport of the ipsec-infrastructure for 2.4, if you look in the redhat kernels, but i never tried to patch a vanilla 2.4 i would rather suggest 2.4 = freeswan (until a maintained 2.6 ipsec backport is available) 2.6 = KAME/racoon i've only played with racoon, but its easy to configure and there exists a good how-to on the web for it. http://www.ipsec-howto.org/ |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-03-02 14:25:40
|
> i don't know, if it make's sense to make freeswan really running > under 2.6 as i proposed in the past ??? > > http://www.freeswan.org/ending_letter.html > > think, resources can be burned otherwise... Yes, it appears "the FreeS/WAN project will be coming to an end" (to quote their web page). According to slashdot, "KAME" was selected as the standard Linux IPSEC implementation. Does anyone have any experience with KAME? (I've never even heard of it myself) Maybe we should think about switching DL to include KAME instead of FreeS/WAN? - BS |
|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-03-02 13:22:38
|
i don't know, if it make's sense to make freeswan really running under 2.6 as i proposed in the past ??? http://www.freeswan.org/ending_letter.html think, resources can be burned otherwise... cheers oliver |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-03-02 02:30:39
|
Feature Requests item #888182, was opened at 2004-01-31 11:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=888182&group_id=34096 Category: Build System Group: v1.1.x >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) >Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Summary: default screen resolution via menuconfig Initial Comment: add selection to menuconfig, to set the default screen resolution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=888182&group_id=34096 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-03-02 02:29:06
|
Feature Requests item #819454, was opened at 2003-10-07 13:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=819454&group_id=34096 Category: Base System >Group: v1.1.x >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Smith (blubdog) >Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Summary: add both XFS and grsecurity Initial Comment: http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/ has a combined patch for the current kernel with both XFS and grsecurity, including all of the following options: O(1) + Batch scheduler Preemptible - enable this in kernel config Low latency - enable this in kernel config Variable Hz Supermount-NG XFS file system Bootsplash Gr Security Andrea Arcangeli's VM patches Rik Van Riel's rmap ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=819454&group_id=34096 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-03-02 02:28:26
|
Feature Requests item #484618, was opened at 2001-11-22 12:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=484618&group_id=34096 Category: Configuration / Scripts Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Monmotha iptables firewall Initial Comment: From: "a a" <cyb...@ya...> To: <dev...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:53 PM Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Monmotha iptables firewall > http://t245.dyndns.org/~monmotha/firewall/index.php > > I have been using this firewall script for a few > months with success. I used to use Seawall on my > prior firewall, tried Shorewall, but couldn't get it > to work at all. This executes fast since there are no subroutines/functions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=484618&group_id=34096 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-03-02 02:28:09
|
Feature Requests item #838106, was opened at 2003-11-07 14:54 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=838106&group_id=34096 Category: Packages Group: Next Release >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) >Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Summary: add heartbeat (linux-ha) Initial Comment: http://linux-ha.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=838106&group_id=34096 |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-02 01:58:46
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 01:22, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>Roland Pabel wrote: >> >>>On Tuesday 02 March 2004 00:25, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> >>>>Roland Pabel wrote: > > [...] > >>Yes the v4l interface changed in 2.6, it's now version 2. > > ok, then you better add the "$CONFIG_LINUX_VERSION" = "2.4" test to > configuration/motion.config like in camsource.config ... Let's wait first until we get the chance to test it. > >>We lately had some issues because of the out-of-date anonymous CVS >>server. I quickly packed up the current CVS and uploaded it to >>ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ > > got it, thanks :-) You're welcome. Heiko |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-03-02 01:50:09
|
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 01:22, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Roland Pabel wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 00:25, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>Roland Pabel wrote: [...] > > Yes the v4l interface changed in 2.6, it's now version 2. ok, then you better add the "$CONFIG_LINUX_VERSION" = "2.4" test to configuration/motion.config like in camsource.config ... > We lately had some issues because of the out-of-date anonymous CVS > server. I quickly packed up the current CVS and uploaded it to > ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ got it, thanks :-) Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-02 00:38:46
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 00:25, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >>Roland Pabel wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>here is the long promised patch for motion ( >>>http://motion.sourceforge.net/ ). It's basically a copy of the camsource >>>files.. >>>Works with the latest stable version: >>>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/motion/motion-3.0.7-1.tar.gz?download >>>(haven't tried the devel version). Motion License is GPL... >> >>OK it's added. > > Thanks :-) > Just one thing: Couldn't check if it compiles with kernel 2.6 yet. I noticed > today camsource is deactivated when kernel 2.6 is selected, that made me > wonder. motion only uses the v4l interface, don't know if that changed from > 2.4 to 2.6 . I couldn't build DL with 2.6 kernel because gcc patches hunks > failed, will try again tomorrow (after next cvs checkout), but I'll do the > init/boot stuff now > Roland Yes the v4l interface changed in 2.6, it's now version 2. We lately had some issues because of the out-of-date anonymous CVS server. I quickly packed up the current CVS and uploaded it to ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/ Heiko |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-03-01 23:58:42
|
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 00:25, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Roland Pabel wrote: > > Hi, > > here is the long promised patch for motion ( > > http://motion.sourceforge.net/ ). It's basically a copy of the camsource > > files.. > > Works with the latest stable version: > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/motion/motion-3.0.7-1.tar.gz?download > > (haven't tried the devel version). Motion License is GPL... > > OK it's added. Thanks :-) Just one thing: Couldn't check if it compiles with kernel 2.6 yet. I noticed today camsource is deactivated when kernel 2.6 is selected, that made me wonder. motion only uses the v4l interface, don't know if that changed from 2.4 to 2.6 . I couldn't build DL with 2.6 kernel because gcc patches hunks failed, will try again tomorrow (after next cvs checkout), but I'll do the init/boot stuff now Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-01 23:42:44
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > Hi, > here is the long promised patch for motion ( http://motion.sourceforge.net/ ). > It's basically a copy of the camsource files.. > Works with the latest stable version: > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/motion/motion-3.0.7-1.tar.gz?download > (haven't tried the devel version). Motion License is GPL... OK it's added. > + if [ "$CONFIG_MYSQL_CLIENT" = "n" ]; then I changed those lines to if [ ! "$CONFIG_MYSQL_CLIENT" = "y" ]; then Since this is better in the case a config value is not defined. Otherwise good job! Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-01 03:03:08
|
Roland Pabel wrote: > Hi, > I finally understood the flow of scripts when the system boots. Scripts in > boot.d/ are never called (what puzzled me at first, because I'm used to them > being called at some point in other distros - before rcX.d scripts are > called, in SuSE). I don't know why you chose rcS.d as the place for system > startup scripts, other distros use it for Single user mode and boot.d exactly > for that job...maybe the DL-way is even the right way(tm), couldn't find > info... I don't even remember why I did it this way, but I have no problem doing it the same way as the others. If you want you can correct it and send us the patch. > But anyways, could we have boot.d/* called, either by the end > of /etc/init.d/boot or by inittab entry "si::bootwait:/etc/init.d/boot.rc"? > Roland I think the best approach would be correcting the scripts to use boot.d instead of rcS.d and then you can just "plug-in" your stuff. Heiko |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-03-01 02:39:54
|
Hi, I finally understood the flow of scripts when the system boots. Scripts in boot.d/ are never called (what puzzled me at first, because I'm used to them being called at some point in other distros - before rcX.d scripts are called, in SuSE). I don't know why you chose rcS.d as the place for system startup scripts, other distros use it for Single user mode and boot.d exactly for that job...maybe the DL-way is even the right way(tm), couldn't find info... But anyways, could we have boot.d/* called, either by the end of /etc/init.d/boot or by inittab entry "si::bootwait:/etc/init.d/boot.rc"? Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Roland P. <pa...@ta...> - 2004-02-29 21:00:16
|
Hi, here is the long promised patch for motion ( http://motion.sourceforge.net/ ). It's basically a copy of the camsource files.. Works with the latest stable version: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/motion/motion-3.0.7-1.tar.gz?download (haven't tried the devel version). Motion License is GPL... Roland -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-28 16:02:18
|
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: > Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arn...@ir...> writes: > > >>I have just had time to test your patch now, and it is working. I am >>no working on "complete" IPv6 routing, that is adding radvd. > > > And here is the sample interface configuration file (ifcfg-eth5.sample). > Looks (almost) good to me. <whine> I still don't like the | sign, I think @ looks much better and even means "at". </whine> Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-28 16:01:18
|
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: > Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arn...@ir...> writes: > > >>I have just had time to test your patch now, and it is working. I am >>no working on "complete" IPv6 routing, that is adding radvd. > > > Whooops, I forgot about a small bug I noticed. When routing IPv6 with > link-local addresses only, you have to explicitely load the ipv6 > module before enabling routing. It is not necessary when using > explicitely assigned IPv6 addresses, as the module is automatically > loaded when ifconfig is invoked. The attached patchlet should do the > trick. > > The same problem arises when using autoconfigured addresses, but this > is generally a bad idea on a server or a router, so I think this is > not a real issue. Anyway, I will add a config option when I have time > (does ENABLE_IPV6 sound right?). Yes. Heiko |
|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2004-02-27 16:09:35
|
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arn...@ir...> writes: > I have just had time to test your patch now, and it is working. I am > no working on "complete" IPv6 routing, that is adding radvd. Whooops, I forgot about a small bug I noticed. When routing IPv6 with link-local addresses only, you have to explicitely load the ipv6 module before enabling routing. It is not necessary when using explicitely assigned IPv6 addresses, as the module is automatically loaded when ifconfig is invoked. The attached patchlet should do the trick. The same problem arises when using autoconfigured addresses, but this is generally a bad idea on a server or a router, so I think this is not a real issue. Anyway, I will add a config option when I have time (does ENABLE_IPV6 sound right?). -- Arnaud |
|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2004-02-27 15:22:53
|
Friedrich Lobenstock <fl...@fl...> writes: > I have reworked your patch for 1.1.x. Can you please test it > since I have no IPv6 network up and running. I have just had time to test your patch now, and it is working. I am no working on "complete" IPv6 routing, that is adding radvd. -- Arnaud |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
