Re: [Dev-C++] Dev-cpp-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Dev-C++] Dev-cpp-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3
|
From: hilmy <hi...@gm...> - 2008-08-05 04:03:33
|
try this
#include <stdio.h>
using namespace std;
char *strset(const char *s, char ch);
main()
{
printf("%s", strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') );
getchar();
}
char *strset(const char *s, char ch)
{
int i;
char *x;
x=new char[sizeof(s)+1];
for(i = 0; s[i]!='\0'; i++) x[i] = ch;
x[i]='\0';
return x;
}
thank u,
hilmy
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:19 AM, <dev...@li...
> wrote:
> Send Dev-cpp-users mailing list submissions to
> dev...@li...
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dev...@li...
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dev...@li...
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dev-cpp-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW (Per Westermark)
> 2. Re: Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW (Derek Clarke)
> 3. Re: Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW (Eric)
> 4. Re: Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW (Per Westermark)
> 5. Re: Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> (Rafael Oliveira Lima)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 19:47:18 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> To: Eric <er...@du...>
> Cc: dev...@li...
> Message-ID:
> <Pin...@ia...>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> "I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use 'void main()'"
>
> You where taught wrong.
>
> main() should always return int, _unless_ you are working with embedded
> programming, where there often is no OS to return back to.
>
> The return value from main() is the return value that the OS will receive
> back when the application ends, i.e. can be used by a batch file to decide
> how to continue.
>
> In this case, the compiler will default any missing type declarations to
> int, so:
> main() {
> }
>
> is a short form of:
> int main(void) {
> }
>
> However, it is strongly recommended to always speicfy the int type
> explicitly (except in relation to short, long or unsigned, in which case
> it is quite common to skip the 'int' part).
>
> /pwm
>
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eric wrote:
>
> > would it not be be a good idea get into a the practice of useing a bit
> more
> > than "main()"
> > to start the main function
> > I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use "void main()"
> >
> >
> > I know I am pulling out hairs here one by one when I should be giving a
> > complete hair cut.
> >
> >
> > maybe I should of re-leant a bit more on "strnset - strset - Set Bytes
> in
> > String" before replying to question
> >
> >
> > >From Eric
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Derek Clarke <de...@ci...>
> > To: Rafael Oliveira Lima <raf...@gm...>
> > Cc: <dev...@li...>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 10:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> >
> >
> > When you type strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') you've pointed parameter s at
> > the static string "TEST, TEST". That string can be put in a read only
> > segment by the compiler, hence the access violation when you try and
> > write to it.
> >
> > Not all implementations will do the same thing, hence it works in some
> > circumstances.
> >
> > It is much better to keep writable data and read only initialisor data
> > apart.
> >
> > so:
> >
> > main()
> > {
> > static char str[] = "TEST, TEST";
> > printf("%s", strset(str, 'c') );
> > getchar();
> > }
> >
> > This might look superficially the same, but this time str and the
> > initialisor data "TEST, TEST" are two different things, and str will
> > definitely be writable.
> >
> > Also for(i = 0; s[i]; i++) is syntactically correct, but it's really bad
> > form.
> >
> > Better to write
> >
> > for(i = 0; s[i] != '\0' ; i++)
> >
> > making the test explicit.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Rafael Oliveira Lima
> > <raf...@gm...> wrote:
> > > Hi All.
> > >
> > > I'm learning C with Dev-C++ and MinGW and a wrote such function like
> this:
> > >
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > >
> > > char *strset(char *s, char ch);
> > >
> > > main()
> > > {
> > > printf("%s", strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') );
> > > getchar();
> > > }
> > >
> > > char *strset(char *s, char ch)
> > > {
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > for(i = 0; s[i]; i++)
> > > s[i] = ch;
> > >
> > > return s;
> > > }
> > >
> > > that would have to fill the string argument with the char ('c') and
> print
> > > it.
> > >
> > > string: "TEST, TEST"
> > > result: "**************"
> > >
> > > But, I have a Access Violation, and program crashes.
> > >
> > > I've tried to compile in LCCWin32 and runs fine.
> > > Then, I've tried, again, to compile in mingw and ran on MSYS,
> suprise....
> > > works fine too.
> > >
> > > But in a DOS shell, the same mingw compiled program gives me a Access
> > > Violation... Why!!!!????
> > >
> > > Please Help...
> > > --
> > > Rafael Oliveira de Lima
> > >
> > > T?cnico Eletr?nico - Projectus NDT.
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> > prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1587 - Release Date:
> 02-Aug-08
> > 17:30
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:38:34 +0100
> From: "Derek Clarke" <de...@ci...>
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> To: dev...@li...
> Message-ID:
> <efe...@ma...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> There's a key dfference between C and C++ here.
>
> in C int main() means main will accept any number of parameters in any
> order, whereas in C++ int main() is the same as the c int main(void),
> i.e. main takes no parameters.
>
> Strictly they're both wrong though. In most operating systems the
> signature of main is in fact
>
> int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
>
> This is so command line arguments can be passed.
>
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> wrote:
> > "I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use 'void main()'"
> >
> > You where taught wrong.
> >
> > main() should always return int, _unless_ you are working with embedded
> > programming, where there often is no OS to return back to.
> >
> > The return value from main() is the return value that the OS will receive
> > back when the application ends, i.e. can be used by a batch file to
> decide
> > how to continue.
> >
> > In this case, the compiler will default any missing type declarations to
> > int, so:
> > main() {
> > }
> >
> > is a short form of:
> > int main(void) {
> > }
> >
> > However, it is strongly recommended to always speicfy the int type
> > explicitly (except in relation to short, long or unsigned, in which case
> > it is quite common to skip the 'int' part).
> >
> > /pwm
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eric wrote:
> >
> >> would it not be be a good idea get into a the practice of useing a bit
> more
> >> than "main()"
> >> to start the main function
> >> I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use "void main()"
> >>
> >>
> >> I know I am pulling out hairs here one by one when I should be giving a
> >> complete hair cut.
> >>
> >>
> >> maybe I should of re-leant a bit more on "strnset - strset - Set Bytes
> in
> >> String" before replying to question
> >>
> >>
> >> >From Eric
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Derek Clarke <de...@ci...>
> >> To: Rafael Oliveira Lima <raf...@gm...>
> >> Cc: <dev...@li...>
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 10:05 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> >>
> >>
> >> When you type strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') you've pointed parameter s at
> >> the static string "TEST, TEST". That string can be put in a read only
> >> segment by the compiler, hence the access violation when you try and
> >> write to it.
> >>
> >> Not all implementations will do the same thing, hence it works in some
> >> circumstances.
> >>
> >> It is much better to keep writable data and read only initialisor data
> >> apart.
> >>
> >> so:
> >>
> >> main()
> >> {
> >> static char str[] = "TEST, TEST";
> >> printf("%s", strset(str, 'c') );
> >> getchar();
> >> }
> >>
> >> This might look superficially the same, but this time str and the
> >> initialisor data "TEST, TEST" are two different things, and str will
> >> definitely be writable.
> >>
> >> Also for(i = 0; s[i]; i++) is syntactically correct, but it's really
> bad
> >> form.
> >>
> >> Better to write
> >>
> >> for(i = 0; s[i] != '\0' ; i++)
> >>
> >> making the test explicit.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Rafael Oliveira Lima
> >> <raf...@gm...> wrote:
> >> > Hi All.
> >> >
> >> > I'm learning C with Dev-C++ and MinGW and a wrote such function like
> this:
> >> >
> >> > #include <stdio.h>
> >> >
> >> > char *strset(char *s, char ch);
> >> >
> >> > main()
> >> > {
> >> > printf("%s", strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') );
> >> > getchar();
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > char *strset(char *s, char ch)
> >> > {
> >> > int i;
> >> >
> >> > for(i = 0; s[i]; i++)
> >> > s[i] = ch;
> >> >
> >> > return s;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > that would have to fill the string argument with the char ('c') and
> print
> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> > string: "TEST, TEST"
> >> > result: "**************"
> >> >
> >> > But, I have a Access Violation, and program crashes.
> >> >
> >> > I've tried to compile in LCCWin32 and runs fine.
> >> > Then, I've tried, again, to compile in mingw and ran on MSYS,
> suprise....
> >> > works fine too.
> >> >
> >> > But in a DOS shell, the same mingw compiled program gives me a Access
> >> > Violation... Why!!!!????
> >> >
> >> > Please Help...
> >> > --
> >> > Rafael Oliveira de Lima
> >> >
> >> > T?cnico Eletr?nico - Projectus NDT.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> >> prizes
> >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> >> Dev...@li...
> >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG.
> >> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1587 - Release Date:
> 02-Aug-08
> >> 17:30
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> >> Dev...@li...
> >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:38:05 +1200
> From: "Eric" <eri...@wo...>
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> To: <dev...@li...>
> Message-ID: <001b01c8f5b1$37aa8e00$8e60d3cb@one>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> No I think at the time it was right but maybe the rules have been changed
> and now it is wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> To: Eric <er...@du...>
> Cc: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 5:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
>
>
> "I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use 'void main()'"
>
> You where taught wrong.
>
> main() should always return int, _unless_ you are working with embedded
> programming, where there often is no OS to return back to.
>
> The return value from main() is the return value that the OS will receive
> back when the application ends, i.e. can be used by a batch file to decide
> how to continue.
>
> In this case, the compiler will default any missing type declarations to
> int, so:
> main() {
> }
>
> is a short form of:
> int main(void) {
> }
>
> However, it is strongly recommended to always speicfy the int type
> explicitly (except in relation to short, long or unsigned, in which case
> it is quite common to skip the 'int' part).
>
> /pwm
>
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eric wrote:
>
> > would it not be be a good idea get into a the practice of useing a bit
> more
> > than "main()"
> > to start the main function
> > I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use "void main()"
> >
> >
> > I know I am pulling out hairs here one by one when I should be giving a
> > complete hair cut.
> >
> >
> > maybe I should of re-leant a bit more on "strnset - strset - Set Bytes
> in
> > String" before replying to question
> >
> >
> > >From Eric
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Derek Clarke <de...@ci...>
> > To: Rafael Oliveira Lima <raf...@gm...>
> > Cc: <dev...@li...>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 10:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> >
> >
> > When you type strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') you've pointed parameter s at
> > the static string "TEST, TEST". That string can be put in a read only
> > segment by the compiler, hence the access violation when you try and
> > write to it.
> >
> > Not all implementations will do the same thing, hence it works in some
> > circumstances.
> >
> > It is much better to keep writable data and read only initialisor data
> > apart.
> >
> > so:
> >
> > main()
> > {
> > static char str[] = "TEST, TEST";
> > printf("%s", strset(str, 'c') );
> > getchar();
> > }
> >
> > This might look superficially the same, but this time str and the
> > initialisor data "TEST, TEST" are two different things, and str will
> > definitely be writable.
> >
> > Also for(i = 0; s[i]; i++) is syntactically correct, but it's really bad
> > form.
> >
> > Better to write
> >
> > for(i = 0; s[i] != '\0' ; i++)
> >
> > making the test explicit.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Rafael Oliveira Lima
> > <raf...@gm...> wrote:
> > > Hi All.
> > >
> > > I'm learning C with Dev-C++ and MinGW and a wrote such function like
> this:
> > >
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > >
> > > char *strset(char *s, char ch);
> > >
> > > main()
> > > {
> > > printf("%s", strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') );
> > > getchar();
> > > }
> > >
> > > char *strset(char *s, char ch)
> > > {
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > for(i = 0; s[i]; i++)
> > > s[i] = ch;
> > >
> > > return s;
> > > }
> > >
> > > that would have to fill the string argument with the char ('c') and
> print
> > > it.
> > >
> > > string: "TEST, TEST"
> > > result: "**************"
> > >
> > > But, I have a Access Violation, and program crashes.
> > >
> > > I've tried to compile in LCCWin32 and runs fine.
> > > Then, I've tried, again, to compile in mingw and ran on MSYS,
> suprise....
> > > works fine too.
> > >
> > > But in a DOS shell, the same mingw compiled program gives me a Access
> > > Violation... Why!!!!????
> > >
> > > Please Help...
> > > --
> > > Rafael Oliveira de Lima
> > >
> > > T?cnico Eletr?nico - Projectus NDT.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:17:38 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> To: Eric <er...@du...>
> Cc: dev...@li...
> Message-ID:
> <Pin...@ia...>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> In the old TurboC days, there where a lot of programs with void main() but
> even then, the return value should have been int, to allow batch files to
> test the ERRORLEVEL variable.
>
> A program not returning with a explicit "return status" - or a call to
> exit(status) - will have a return value of 0.
>
> /pwm
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Eric wrote:
>
> > No I think at the time it was right but maybe the rules have been changed
> > and now it is wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> > To: Eric <er...@du...>
> > Cc: <dev...@li...>
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 5:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> >
> >
> > "I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use 'void main()'"
> >
> > You where taught wrong.
> >
> > main() should always return int, _unless_ you are working with embedded
> > programming, where there often is no OS to return back to.
> >
> > The return value from main() is the return value that the OS will receive
> > back when the application ends, i.e. can be used by a batch file to
> decide
> > how to continue.
> >
> > In this case, the compiler will default any missing type declarations to
> > int, so:
> > main() {
> > }
> >
> > is a short form of:
> > int main(void) {
> > }
> >
> > However, it is strongly recommended to always speicfy the int type
> > explicitly (except in relation to short, long or unsigned, in which case
> > it is quite common to skip the 'int' part).
> >
> > /pwm
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Eric wrote:
> >
> > > would it not be be a good idea get into a the practice of useing a bit
> > more
> > > than "main()"
> > > to start the main function
> > > I was taught on day one of C/C++ to use "void main()"
> > >
> > >
> > > I know I am pulling out hairs here one by one when I should be giving a
> > > complete hair cut.
> > >
> > >
> > > maybe I should of re-leant a bit more on "strnset - strset - Set Bytes
> in
> > > String" before replying to question
> > >
> > >
> > > >From Eric
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Derek Clarke <de...@ci...>
> > > To: Rafael Oliveira Lima <raf...@gm...>
> > > Cc: <dev...@li...>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 10:05 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> > >
> > >
> > > When you type strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') you've pointed parameter s at
> > > the static string "TEST, TEST". That string can be put in a read only
> > > segment by the compiler, hence the access violation when you try and
> > > write to it.
> > >
> > > Not all implementations will do the same thing, hence it works in some
> > > circumstances.
> > >
> > > It is much better to keep writable data and read only initialisor data
> > > apart.
> > >
> > > so:
> > >
> > > main()
> > > {
> > > static char str[] = "TEST, TEST";
> > > printf("%s", strset(str, 'c') );
> > > getchar();
> > > }
> > >
> > > This might look superficially the same, but this time str and the
> > > initialisor data "TEST, TEST" are two different things, and str will
> > > definitely be writable.
> > >
> > > Also for(i = 0; s[i]; i++) is syntactically correct, but it's really
> bad
> > > form.
> > >
> > > Better to write
> > >
> > > for(i = 0; s[i] != '\0' ; i++)
> > >
> > > making the test explicit.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Rafael Oliveira Lima
> > > <raf...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > Hi All.
> > > >
> > > > I'm learning C with Dev-C++ and MinGW and a wrote such function like
> > this:
> > > >
> > > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > >
> > > > char *strset(char *s, char ch);
> > > >
> > > > main()
> > > > {
> > > > printf("%s", strset("TEST, TEST", 'c') );
> > > > getchar();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > char *strset(char *s, char ch)
> > > > {
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > for(i = 0; s[i]; i++)
> > > > s[i] = ch;
> > > >
> > > > return s;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > that would have to fill the string argument with the char ('c') and
> > print
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > string: "TEST, TEST"
> > > > result: "**************"
> > > >
> > > > But, I have a Access Violation, and program crashes.
> > > >
> > > > I've tried to compile in LCCWin32 and runs fine.
> > > > Then, I've tried, again, to compile in mingw and ran on MSYS,
> > suprise....
> > > > works fine too.
> > > >
> > > > But in a DOS shell, the same mingw compiled program gives me a Access
> > > > Violation... Why!!!!????
> > > >
> > > > Please Help...
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Oliveira de Lima
> > > >
> > > > T?cnico Eletr?nico - Projectus NDT.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:49:17 -0300
> From: "Rafael Oliveira Lima" <raf...@gm...>
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Help me.... strange char functions on MinGW
> To: dev...@li...
> Message-ID:
> <959...@ma...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ok Great People! I really thanks you Eric and Derek to answer my question!
>
> For now I?m using variables it?s better.
>
> I thought that's to be a reason for some compilers ( LCCWin32) do what i
> said before, but each have particularity. As I prefer the Dev-C++ and MinGW
> (3.4.5), it?s better to respect the way of code if I want to port for gcc
> on
> Linux.
>
> I pick the advices of making explicit tests ( I tried to make use of pure
> logic, but You're right Derek).
>
> Once again... thanks and regards!
>
> --
> Rafael Oliveira de Lima
>
> T?cnico Eletr?nico - Projectus NDT.
>
> Programador Junior e Depurador Assembly em Arquiteturas RISC Microchip 8
> bits.
> (fam?lias PIC12*, PIC14*, PIC16* e PIC18*).
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.noicys.cjb.net/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> End of Dev-cpp-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 3
> ********************************************
>
|
