dev-cpp-users

[Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[xuesong c. <xue...@ms...>]

I found the latest dev-cpp4.9.7.0(gcc2.95.3) included gcc-2.95.3-6.
why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8 which was released on Sep 22nd.
and I think now gcc-2.95.3 works better than gcc-3.2.
for example:
I use gcc-2.95.3-8 to compile my sample windows driver,the driver works 
well,
while if I use gcc-3.2,the driver makes the OS CRASH!!!





_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Re: [Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[Christer G. <dt...@st...>]

xuesong chen wrote:
> I found the latest dev-cpp4.9.7.0(gcc2.95.3) included gcc-2.95.3-6.
> why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8 which was released on Sep 22nd.
> and I think now gcc-2.95.3 works better than gcc-3.2.
> for example:
> I use gcc-2.95.3-8 to compile my sample windows driver,the driver works 
> well,
> while if I use gcc-3.2,the driver makes the OS CRASH!!!
> 

Sorry, but this tells us nothing more than your shitty code.


-- 
Med Vennlig Hilsen / Best regards
Christer Gundersen / dizzy tun3Z
http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu

Re: [Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[Andres R. <an...@or...>]

> Sorry, but this tells us nothing more than your shitty code.

Note that 2.95.3-x and 3.2 are rather different compilers! The
code might be ok, but 3.2 does not generate 2.95.x compilant binary.

Andres.

Re: [Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[<or...@vp...>]

Hello!

Andres Rand wrote:
> Note that 2.95.3-x and 3.2 are rather different compilers! The
> code might be ok, but 3.2 does not generate 2.95.x compilant binary.

Yes, as far as I know gcc 3.2 changed the ABI (Binary Interface). 
Anyhow, this is the reason why it is not yet in Debain Linux, etc. They 
need to recompile everything.

--
Greetings,
   Balázs

Re: [Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[Christer G. <dt...@st...>]

OROSZI Bal=E1zs wrote:
> Yes, as far as I know gcc 3.2 changed the ABI (Binary Interface).=20
> Anyhow, this is the reason why it is not yet in Debain Linux, etc. They=
=20
> need to recompile everything.
>

It`s in Debian unstable.

--=20
Med Vennlig Hilsen / Best regards
Christer Gundersen / dizzy tun3Z
http://dtz.cjb.net - http://carebears.mine.nu

[Dev-C++] Win32 API version

[P.D. v. Z. <pd...@xs...>]

Hi,

I was wondering, which version of the Win32 API is included with
Dev-C++? I fear it's not the most recent one. I tried to use a call
which should be included (AnimateWindow), but I got an error about it.
My MSDN library tells me that it should be in "winuser.h" (which is
included by "windows.h" as far as I know), so I did a search for any
file with the text "AnimateWindow" in it in my Dev-C++ folder... and it
didn't find anything. I know this call is part of the Win32 API, as I've
used it a couple of times before (using Visual C++, and no it isn't an
MFC function).

Regards,


Paul

Re: [Dev-C++] why not includes the latest gcc-2.95.3-8

[Flameeyes <di...@li...>]

Christer Gundersen wrote:
>> Yes, as far as I know gcc 3.2 changed the ABI (Binary Interface). 
>> Anyhow, this is the reason why it is not yet in Debain Linux, etc. 
>> They need to recompile everything.
> It`s in Debian unstable.

I use it to compile the kernel (2.4.19-xfs1.2pre5) and it works quite well.
The only software that I can't compile with gcc3.2 for now is kvirc3.