Per W:
Sure you are right: I'm not planning to running the IDE on some embedded
system.
But my idea is to make the IDE a good tool to develop emebeded system with
embedded OS.
Now there are some em-OSes, such as em-linux, uc/os. But I think they are not
easy to use. For example, the coder must configure em-OS manually, delete
useless code from em-OS manually, and he can not estimate the performance of
em-OS(size, speed) when coding.
My idea is to add some buttons to the IDE. One is configure button, the coder
can choose, say, how many tasks in the em-system, the tactic of task-switch,
and so on. And before compiling, the IDE can automatically delete useless
em-OS code according to em-OS configuration. The other button is performance
button, which can estimate the performance of em-OS according to current
configuration.
It is said that vxWorks has realized the idea above. I dont know it true or
not, for I have never used vxWorks. No matter it's true or not, I want to do
it, to show my capability to the university. :)
Now you know why must I change the source of dev-cpp?
And after all, even if I just change the compiler, still I have to recompile
the IDE source, or it will still call MinGW. Isn't it?
ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÌáµ½
>Who do you need to recompile environment, just to use it for an embedded
>system? I assume you are not planning on running the IDE on the embedded
>system - just use it to create applications for the embedded systems.
>
>Just write a stub program that gets called instead of the MinGW
>compiler, and that calls the embedded compiler with suitably renamed
>parameters.
>
>/Per W
>
>
--http://www.eyou.com
--Îȶ¨¿É¿¿µÄµç×ÓÐÅÏä ÓïÒôÓʼþ Òƶ¯ÊéÇ© ÈÕÀú·þÎñ ÍøÂç´æ´¢...ÒÚÓÊδ¾¡
--http://vip.eyou.com
--¿ì¿ìµÇ¼ÒÚÓÊVIPÐÅÏä ×¢²áÄúÖÐÒâµÄÓû§Ãû
|
