As we go in the past, we will find less template support and ANSI C++
compliance (the standard is very recent). The template support of GCC
2.9.x is in high degree (higher than VC++ 7 .NET). Naturally in 3.x
things are even better. I have read somewhere in MINGW site that till
GCC 3.x stabilizes, we will work with the 2.9.x releases (mainly bug
fixes). The only thing i have discovered so far personally to be not
supported in MINGW is vector::at() member function, which i do not use
too much anyway since it implies some time cost.
[For informationan purposes at() is range checked member access, that is
it throws an exception if the range is wrong but i do not need it since
i use the [] in combination with .size(): array[i]<array.size() ).
GCC in general is very high in standards conformance and quality.
Ioannis
* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf
> Of Robert Beatty
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 9:01 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: [Dev-C++] full template support?
>
>
> hello all:
>
> version 4.9.2.0 uses gcc 2.95.xx correct? i vaguely
> recall how gcc versions below 3.x not FULLY supporting
> templates. can anybody confirm this? whether it does
> or not, how soon will we see gcc version 3.x+ in this
> great compiler?
>
> thanks
> berto
>
> ps: happy mother's day for all the mothers out there
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> http://launch.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
> mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
> ban...@so...
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
|
