dev-cpp-users

RE: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li... 
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Jason Hardman
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:48 AM
> To: Dev-C++; Napoleon Ahiable
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4
> 
> 
> At the moment Athlons are faster and cheaper than their 
> equivalents in the P4 range, which is good
> enough for me. Also, just a quick correction, the official 
> line with the Athlon XP ????+ where the
> ???? is a number i.e. 2100, the number represents how fast 
> the clock speed of an Athlon based on the
> older Athlon CPU core would have to run to get the same performance.


Actually it is of the equivallent Intel CPU. Nothing to do with the
previous core.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys

Re: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4

[Benjamin W. <ben...@ho...>]

It looks like you have had some great discussion on the AMD chips, and I 
figured that I would simply add my two-cents worth.

AMD versus Intel...  personally, I don't care.  I have used AMD's in the 
past in both my laptop and desktop and they perform wonderfully, especially 
running Windows 2000 or better.

I run Intel Pentium 3 here at work and really, I don't see any difference.

It's personal preference, and since AMD is cheaper in the cost sense of the 
word, why not?

Hope this helps,
Ben

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Re: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4

[Jason H. <jas...@bt...>]

My previous statement is right and is based upon an article at:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2107677,00.html
Where it says:

"AMD launched its "True Performance Initiative" with the Athlon XP processor last autumn, in order
to shift consumers away from the perception that a chip with a faster clock speed offers better
performance. Athlon XP chips come with a model number that indicates their performance relative to
older Athlon chips, so that the Athlon XP 2000+ (at 1.67GHz) would offer roughly the same
performance as an earlier Athlon clocking 2,000MHz (2GHz). Intel and its allies claim the model
numbers are designed to invite comparison with Pentium 4 chips of a similar clock speed."

Jason.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ho...>
To: "Dev-C++" <dev...@li...>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf
> Of Jason Hardman
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:48 AM
> To: Dev-C++; Napoleon Ahiable
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] AMD ATHLON v PENTIUM 4
>
>
> At the moment Athlons are faster and cheaper than their
> equivalents in the P4 range, which is good
> enough for me. Also, just a quick correction, the official
> line with the Athlon XP ????+ where the
> ???? is a number i.e. 2100, the number represents how fast
> the clock speed of an Athlon based on the
> older Athlon CPU core would have to run to get the same performance.


Actually it is of the equivallent Intel CPU. Nothing to do with the
previous core.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys

_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users