dev-cpp-users

Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: erwan ancel=0D
Date: =CA=F5=F1=E9=E1=EA=DE, 12 =C9=E1=ED=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 6:29:=
49 =EC=EC=0D
To: Ioannis Vranos=0D
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions=0D
 =0D
???=0D
You're right. The change from class to typename made my code compile, but=
 I
continued with coding, and now, when I change my code from typename to cl=
ass
 it does compile... I do not know what makes it compile now...=0D
Anyway, I will stay with the class keyword. I found it more beautiful :)=0D
 =0D
nb: there is no B(), this was just a simple sample to illustrate my probl=
em.
=2E I thought ....=0D
 =0D
 =0D
=3D> :) As i said the typename and class words there are equivalents. cla=
ss
doesn't mean it is for classes only, rather it is meant to mean type. The
fact that they are equivalents is not from my mind, this is how they are
defined in the ANSI/ISO C++ 1998 standard.=0D
 =0D
 =0D
As far as why it didn't compile before, it is 100% certain that you did s=
ome
type of mistake (probably some typo).=0D
 =0D
 =0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
 =0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys=20

Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions

[Daniel G. <sp...@ho...>]

I believe VC++ 6.0 has a problem with templates, hence template T not class 
T. r something


>From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ho...>
>To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" <dev...@li...>
>Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions
>Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:17:02 +0200 (GTB Standard Time)
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
>From: erwan ancel
>Date: ÊõñéáêÞ, 12 ÉáíïõÜñéïò 2003 3:51:27 ìì
>To: dev...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions
>
>This is only a function declaration, not a call.
>
>==> Then you declared a function without a return type.
>
>Correct it to void B();
>
>
>  Anyway, somebody on the
>gcc-help mailing list gave me a solution that seems to work: replace
>"template <class T>" by "template <typename T>". But I don't know why ...
>
>
>==> The typename has exactly the same effect. They are both equivalents for
>the definition of template arguments.
>
>
>Ioannis Vranos
>
>* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com
>* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: Daniel Glenfield=0D
Date: =CA=F5=F1=E9=E1=EA=DE, 12 =C9=E1=ED=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 6:45:=
38 =EC=EC=0D
To: no...@ho...; dev...@li...=0D
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions=0D
 =0D
I believe VC++ 6.0 has a problem with templates, hence template T not cla=
ss
T. r something=0D
=0D
=0D
=3D> Well VC++ 6 is too old to mention it. After all it did not compile
properly even the for loops.=0D
=0D
VC++ 7 however is OK.=0D
=0D
=0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
=0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys=20

Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions

[erwan a. <erw...@fr...>]

>As far as why it didn't compile before, it is 100% certain that you did
some
>type of mistake (probably some typo).


Yes. pretty sure :)

            thanks a lot.

                Erwan