Menu
▾
▴
dev-cpp-users
|
From: Ioannis V. <no...@ho...> - 2002-06-07 22:30:47
|
And the release notes for the MINGW GCC 3.1: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=90000 Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net <http://www.noicys.cjb.net/> * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys |
|
From: Colin L. <col...@wa...> - 2002-06-11 22:24:13
|
Hello, I will do tests on gcc 3.1 to see if it's stable enough for inclusion in main Dev-C++ distribution. Everybody feel free to email me the problems you may be having with it, comparing to the good old gcc 2.95.3. Greetings, Colin On Saturday 08 June 2002 00:30, you wrote: > And the release notes for the MINGW GCC 3.1: > http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=90000 > > > > Ioannis > > * Ioannis Vranos > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > <http://www.noicys.cjb.net/> > * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- |
|
From: Ioannis V. <no...@ho...> - 2002-06-11 22:34:35
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: dev...@li... > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf > Of Colin Laplace > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:25 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > > > Hello, > > I will do tests on gcc 3.1 to see if it's stable enough for > inclusion in main > Dev-C++ distribution. Everybody feel free to email me the > problems you may be > having with it, comparing to the good old gcc 2.95.3. > > Greetings, > Colin Ok but use the CVS distribution (what exactly is CVS?). I reported a very minor bug in 3.1's stdio.h and they told me it was already fixed in the CVS distribution, and "the sourceforge binaries will be updated sometime soon". Except of this, GCC 3.1 is *excellent*, it provides useful warnings and stuff (and is probably 100% standard C++ compliant or at least very close to it, since i have not found any C++ construct so far that it doesn't support, (in contrast to the classic 2.95.x distributions, 2.95.x were made in the 1997 era, and only bug fixes were provided since the original version). Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys |
|
From: Jason H. <jas...@nt...> - 2002-06-11 22:46:45
|
CVS stands for Concurrent Versions System, and is a tool to enable a group of people to work with the source of a program. Significantly CVS is available for use on sourceforge, and allows a developer to "checkout" a particular source file work on it and store the changes/fixes back with the original. With a CVS archive you can regress your sourcecode to an earlier state, or branch off and perform two concurrent developments. It's something I'm still trying to learn so I probably am not explaining it very well, but you can find more info in the sourceforge docs or here at: http://www.cvshome.org/ Jason. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ho...> To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" <dev...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:34 PM Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > -----Original Message----- > From: dev...@li... > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf > Of Colin Laplace > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:25 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > > > Hello, > > I will do tests on gcc 3.1 to see if it's stable enough for > inclusion in main > Dev-C++ distribution. Everybody feel free to email me the > problems you may be > having with it, comparing to the good old gcc 2.95.3. > > Greetings, > Colin Ok but use the CVS distribution (what exactly is CVS?). I reported a very minor bug in 3.1's stdio.h and they told me it was already fixed in the CVS distribution, and "the sourceforge binaries will be updated sometime soon". Except of this, GCC 3.1 is *excellent*, it provides useful warnings and stuff (and is probably 100% standard C++ compliant or at least very close to it, since i have not found any C++ construct so far that it doesn't support, (in contrast to the classic 2.95.x distributions, 2.95.x were made in the 1997 era, and only bug fixes were provided since the original version). Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys _______________________________________________________________ Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar _______________________________________________ Dev-cpp-users mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users |
|
From: Ioannis V. <no...@ho...> - 2002-06-11 22:55:03
|
Thanks for the interesting info! Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Hardman [mailto:jas...@nt...] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:46 AM > To: Dev-C++; Ioannis Vranos > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > > > CVS stands for Concurrent Versions System, and is a tool to > enable a group of people to work with > the source of a program. Significantly CVS is available for > use on sourceforge, and allows a > developer to "checkout" a particular source file work on it > and store the changes/fixes back with > the original. With a CVS archive you can regress your > sourcecode to an earlier state, or branch off > and perform two concurrent developments. It's something I'm > still trying to learn so I probably am > not explaining it very well, but you can find more info in > the sourceforge docs or here at: > http://www.cvshome.org/ > > Jason. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ho...> > To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" <dev...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:34 PM > Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev...@li... > > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf > > Of Colin Laplace > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:25 AM > > To: dev...@li... > > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] MINGW GCC 3.x II > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I will do tests on gcc 3.1 to see if it's stable enough for > > inclusion in main > > Dev-C++ distribution. Everybody feel free to email me the > > problems you may be > > having with it, comparing to the good old gcc 2.95.3. > > > > Greetings, > > Colin > > > Ok but use the CVS distribution (what exactly is CVS?). I reported a > very minor bug in 3.1's stdio.h and they told me it was > already fixed in > the CVS distribution, and "the sourceforge binaries will be updated > sometime soon". Except of this, GCC 3.1 is *excellent*, it provides > useful warnings and stuff (and is probably 100% standard C++ compliant > or at least very close to it, since i have not found any C++ construct > so far that it doesn't support, (in contrast to the classic 2.95.x > distributions, 2.95.x were made in the 1997 era, and only bug > fixes were > provided since the original version). > > > > Ioannis > > * Ioannis Vranos > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory > Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - > http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > |
|
From: <h.r...@gm...> - 2002-06-12 17:12:20
|
Hi,
Can anybody explain me why the following Code works:
void ReadData(const char* s)
{
extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf;
ifstream in(s);
string line;
getline(in, line);
pf.MeanS = (atof(line.c_str()));
[...]
and
void ReadData(const char* s)
{
extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf;
ifstream in(s);
string line;
getline(in, line);
pf.MeanS = atof(line.c_str());
[...]
works not ? Why is there a need for brackets ?
Thanks in advance,
Greetings
Horst
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
|
|
From: <h.r...@gm...> - 2002-06-12 17:36:01
|
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody explain me why the following Code works:
>
> void ReadData(const char* s)
> {
> extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf;
>
> ifstream in(s);
> string line;
>
> getline(in, line);
> pf.MeanS = (atof(line.c_str()));
> [...]
>
> and
>
> void ReadData(const char* s)
> {
> extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf;
>
> ifstream in(s);
> string line;
>
> getline(in, line);
> pf.MeanS = atof(line.c_str());
> [...]
>
> works not ? Why is there a need for brackets ?
> Thanks in advance,
> Greetings
> Horst
sorry for my wrong subject in last posting
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
|
|
From: Ioannis V. <no...@ho...> - 2002-06-13 00:34:18
|
As i see it, it should work. Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys > -----Original Message----- > From: dev...@li... > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf > Of h.r...@gm... > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:36 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: [Dev-C++] necessary brackets ? > > > > Hi, > > > > Can anybody explain me why the following Code works: > > > > void ReadData(const char* s) > > { > > extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf; > > > > ifstream in(s); > > string line; > > > > getline(in, line); > > pf.MeanS = (atof(line.c_str())); > > [...] > > > > and > > > > void ReadData(const char* s) > > { > > extern Prozessfaehigkeit pf; > > > > ifstream in(s); > > string line; > > > > getline(in, line); > > pf.MeanS = atof(line.c_str()); > > [...] > > > > works not ? Why is there a need for brackets ? > > Thanks in advance, > > Greetings > > Horst > sorry for my wrong subject in last posting > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > |
|
From: Hongli L. <h....@ch...> - 2002-06-12 13:14:11
|
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 00:25, Colin Laplace wrote: > Hello, > > I will do tests on gcc 3.1 to see if it's stable enough for inclusion in main > Dev-C++ distribution. Everybody feel free to email me the problems you may be > having with it, comparing to the good old gcc 2.95.3. > > Greetings, > Colin > If you create a new distribution just don't forget to add the Package Manager to the menu group and to associate the right icons to the right file types. |
