dev-cpp-users Mailing List for Dev-C++ (Page 341)
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(258) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(377) |
Feb
(260) |
Mar
(249) |
Apr
(188) |
May
(152) |
Jun
(150) |
Jul
(195) |
Aug
(202) |
Sep
(200) |
Oct
(286) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(165) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(245) |
Feb
(241) |
Mar
(239) |
Apr
(346) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(369) |
Jul
(418) |
Aug
(357) |
Sep
(362) |
Oct
(597) |
Nov
(455) |
Dec
(344) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(446) |
Feb
(397) |
Mar
(515) |
Apr
(524) |
May
(377) |
Jun
(387) |
Jul
(532) |
Aug
(364) |
Sep
(294) |
Oct
(352) |
Nov
(295) |
Dec
(327) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(416) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(324) |
Apr
(249) |
May
(259) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(212) |
Aug
(259) |
Sep
(158) |
Oct
(162) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(169) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(199) |
Apr
(147) |
May
(131) |
Jun
(163) |
Jul
(235) |
Aug
(136) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(88) |
Nov
(113) |
Dec
(100) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(119) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(116) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(106) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Daniel G. <sp...@ho...> - 2003-07-25 06:23:29
|
DirectX is used by many many people and organisations. Microsoft recently removed themselves from the OpenGL consortium (or whatever its called) as a side note. I reckon DirectX is the way to go, you know 2D programming and Dx has (had) a 2D component, which is now part of Direct3D. Check out GamesDev.Net >From: OROSZI Balázs <or...@vp...> >To: dev...@li... >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] moving to 3d programming >Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 02:34:41 +0200 > >dein_metzger wrote: > >> Hi to the list. >> I use directdraw for 2d graphics programming. >> I am thinking about learning 3d graphics programming. >> What´s the better? opengl or direct3d? > >OpenGL. (cross-platform, tradition, easy to understand, lots of tutorials, >part of mingw - no need to download anything else, etc.) > >-- >Greetings, > Balázs > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 >_______________________________________________ >Dev-cpp-users mailing list >Dev...@li... >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users _________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile |
|
From: Per W. <pw...@ia...> - 2003-07-25 03:50:21
|
Of course there is. /Per W On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, vinay k wrote: > hello experts, > Is there any provision of using variable of type int64 > in Dev-c++. Microsoft visual studio has that > provision. > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > |
|
From: vinay k <vin...@ya...> - 2003-07-25 03:39:41
|
hello experts, Is there any provision of using variable of type int64 in Dev-c++. Microsoft visual studio has that provision. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
From: David M. <ci...@ya...> - 2003-07-25 03:22:00
|
What I was more looking to point out was the password some one uses to access their accout could also be their e-mail account password as well as the password for other accounts. If you are able to retrive the original password you open alot of posibilities. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...> To: "David McKen" <ci...@ya...> Cc: "Dev-C Mailing List" <dev...@li...> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] (no subject) > Bug without knowing the pwd, it is possible to set a known one, do some > nice things, and then set back the original - without knowing what the > original pwd was. > > /Per W > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, David McKen wrote: > > > Being able to get the old is worse because the user will > > not notice that it has changed and a careful person can > > make it so that no (or rather very few) other traces are > > left. > > > > To make matters worse, many people re-use passwords (makes > > it easier to rember) > > > > --- Per Westermark <pw...@ia...> wrote: > > > One more thing - this information is about cracking a > > > password, i.e. > > > finding out what it is. If I don't bother, there are a > > > number of programs > > > available what will allow setting a new password without > > > knowing the old. > > > > > > /Per W > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > > > > > > I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, > > > so I thought to drop > > > > it in here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From WinInfo Daily Update: > > > > > > > > === 1. News and Views ==== > > > > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > > > > > > > > Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > > > > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking > > > scheme, based > > > > on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them > > > crack most Windows > > > > passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method > > > takes more than a > > > > minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a > > > growing concern in > > > > the security community that the way in which Microsoft > > > encodes > > > > passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the > > > door for cracking > > > > programs to use brute-force methods to test and break > > > passwords. > > > > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, > > > recently published > > > > an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic > > > Time-Memory > > > > Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking > > > scheme. > > > > Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto > > > 2003, an > > > > international cryptology conference held this year at > > > the University > > > > of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the > > > International > > > > Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in > > > cooperation with the > > > > IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security > > > and Privacy. > > > > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on > > > MS-Windows > > > > password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB > > > of data (two > > > > CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all > > > alphanumerical passwords > > > > hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds > > > with the > > > > current approach using distinguished points. We show > > > that the gain > > > > could be even much higher depending on the parameters > > > used." > > > > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in > > > cracking Windows > > > > passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the > > > previous > > > > theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off > > > technique. They note > > > > that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when > > > encrypted, they > > > > don't include any random information. Thus, the same > > > password on two > > > > Windows machines will always be the same when > > > encrypted, which makes > > > > breaking the password encryption much easier than if > > > the passwords > > > > were randomized. > > > > Although generating more secure passwords by using > > > nonalphanumeric > > > > characters and other special characters is possible, > > > the researchers > > > > say that even this approach won't solve the inherent > > > problem in > > > > Windows because all they'd need is more time or a > > > larger data set (or > > > > both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, > > > Microsoft will have > > > > to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random > > > information, the > > > > researchers say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > > > ----------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ioannis Vranos > > > > > > > > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com > > > > * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys > > > > * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > > sites including > > > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > > available now. > > > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > > > Studio .NET. > > > > > > > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > > > Dev...@li... > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > > sites including > > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > > available now. > > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > > > .NET. > > > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > > Dev...@li... > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > > > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > > > > ===== > > Signed > > David Mcken > > > > Life Sucks > > Live with it > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > http://search.yahoo.com > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
From: <or...@vp...> - 2003-07-25 00:34:23
|
dein_metzger wrote: > Hi to the list. > I use directdraw for 2d graphics programming. > I am thinking about learning 3d graphics programming. > What´s the better? opengl or direct3d? OpenGL. (cross-platform, tradition, easy to understand, lots of tutorials, part of mingw - no need to download anything else, etc.) -- Greetings, Balázs |
|
From: dein_metzger <dei...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 23:49:59
|
Hi to the list. I use directdraw for 2d graphics programming. I am thinking about learning 3d graphics programming. What=B4s the better? opengl or direct3d? thanks in advance, InacioW- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/7/2003 =20 |
|
From: Ioannis V. <iv...@em...> - 2003-07-24 20:49:06
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: dev...@li...=20 > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Abhijit Shylanath > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:01 PM > To: ci...@ya...; Dev-C Mailing List > Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] (no subject) >=20 >=20 >=20 > > Not sure if this still applies but there is a SAM file > > located somewhere in the system32 directory. Problem with > > this file is not even an administrator can open it! NT > > locks it down as soon as it starts (anyone got a NTFS > > reader?) > > >=20 > Yup, reasonably new versions of Linux can read NTFS. from DOS=20 > (freeware, > untested): > http://download.com.com/3000-2094-10126096.html >=20 > You said NT locks the file as soon as it starts, does that extend to > driver-load time? I mean, by `start' do you mean the=20 > user-visible start or > the actual kernel load? If not, one could theoretically write=20 > a fake driver > that can access the file. I wouldn't be surprised if Windows=20 > had a hole like > that. A file-system by itself does not potect anything. The access properties = of files and folders make sense only when you access them through the = specific OS. So NTFS can be read by other Oses, the same as ext2fs and other file systems of GNU/Linux. When I couldn't login to Win2K in the past because some application messed up the OS I did not lose my files. I = reinstallled Win2k without reformating the drive, I was getting my files to a CD and = then made a clean install (with formatting of the HDD). The same things apply to all OSes including GNU/Linux. If you want to = secure your files against theft you have to encrypt them, either using a third-party program or facilities of the OS. NTFS in Windows 2000 and later provides the ability for encryption using = a key randomly produced for each account. Programs that reset the password from the outside by deleting or editing some file (I do not know the OS internals) have also aas a result that key to be erased so files = encrypted via EFS (the encryption part of NTFS) from that user account become unaccessible. Ioannis Vranos =20 * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net |
|
From: <or...@vp...> - 2003-07-24 20:31:02
|
Abhijit Shylanath wrote: > You said NT locks the file as soon as it starts, does that extend to > driver-load time? I mean, by `start' do you mean the user-visible start or > the actual kernel load? If not, one could theoretically write a fake driver > that can access the file. I wouldn't be surprised if Windows had a hole like > that. Who knows if this hole is a wanted "feature" by M$? To turn a bit away from the subject: I doubt that the so famous nimda virus has found security holes. I think they were actually not holes, but backdoors left for M$, so that they can access your server anytime, without you knowing of it. Sometimes the virus writers find these backdoors, left by M$. Just read the EULA of Windows XP, you'll find strange things there. Another thing might be, what if nimda was actually the creation of M$ itself? I mean, to scare some high guy. Of course, this is all fiction, but it is still starnge, that nimda's spreading algorithm was "incorrect", so it was spreading too slow. I doubt that a virus writer, who can write a so perfect virus, located HUGE security holes (or backdoors) would write an incorrect spreading algorithm. I don't know exactly how it worked, I just know that if it was written good, nimda would have infected ALL M$ servers. Just my brain-foolishness... -- Greetings, Balázs |
|
From: Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...> - 2003-07-24 20:00:08
|
> Not sure if this still applies but there is a SAM file > located somewhere in the system32 directory. Problem with > this file is not even an administrator can open it! NT > locks it down as soon as it starts (anyone got a NTFS > reader?) > Yup, reasonably new versions of Linux can read NTFS. from DOS (freeware, untested): http://download.com.com/3000-2094-10126096.html You said NT locks the file as soon as it starts, does that extend to driver-load time? I mean, by `start' do you mean the user-visible start or the actual kernel load? If not, one could theoretically write a fake driver that can access the file. I wouldn't be surprised if Windows had a hole like that. -- Abhijit Shylanath Homepage: http://mudeth.tripod.com/ |
|
From: Per W. <pw...@ia...> - 2003-07-24 19:43:55
|
Bug without knowing the pwd, it is possible to set a known one, do some nice things, and then set back the original - without knowing what the original pwd was. /Per W On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, David McKen wrote: > Being able to get the old is worse because the user will > not notice that it has changed and a careful person can > make it so that no (or rather very few) other traces are > left. > > To make matters worse, many people re-use passwords (makes > it easier to rember) > > --- Per Westermark <pw...@ia...> wrote: > > One more thing - this information is about cracking a > > password, i.e. > > finding out what it is. If I don't bother, there are a > > number of programs > > available what will allow setting a new password without > > knowing the old. > > > > /Per W > > > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > > > > I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, > > so I thought to drop > > > it in here. > > > > > > > > > > > > >From WinInfo Daily Update: > > > > > > === 1. News and Views ==== > > > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > > > > > > Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > > > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking > > scheme, based > > > on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them > > crack most Windows > > > passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method > > takes more than a > > > minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a > > growing concern in > > > the security community that the way in which Microsoft > > encodes > > > passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the > > door for cracking > > > programs to use brute-force methods to test and break > > passwords. > > > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, > > recently published > > > an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic > > Time-Memory > > > Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking > > scheme. > > > Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto > > 2003, an > > > international cryptology conference held this year at > > the University > > > of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the > > International > > > Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in > > cooperation with the > > > IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security > > and Privacy. > > > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on > > MS-Windows > > > password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB > > of data (two > > > CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all > > alphanumerical passwords > > > hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds > > with the > > > current approach using distinguished points. We show > > that the gain > > > could be even much higher depending on the parameters > > used." > > > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in > > cracking Windows > > > passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the > > previous > > > theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off > > technique. They note > > > that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when > > encrypted, they > > > don't include any random information. Thus, the same > > password on two > > > Windows machines will always be the same when > > encrypted, which makes > > > breaking the password encryption much easier than if > > the passwords > > > were randomized. > > > Although generating more secure passwords by using > > nonalphanumeric > > > characters and other special characters is possible, > > the researchers > > > say that even this approach won't solve the inherent > > problem in > > > Windows because all they'd need is more time or a > > larger data set (or > > > both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, > > Microsoft will have > > > to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random > > information, the > > > researchers say. > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ----------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ioannis Vranos > > > > > > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com > > > * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys > > > * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > sites including > > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > available now. > > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > > Studio .NET. > > > > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > > Dev...@li... > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > > sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > > available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > > .NET. > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > ===== > Signed > David Mcken > > Life Sucks > Live with it > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > |
|
From: David M. <ci...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 19:37:12
|
Not sure if this still applies but there is a SAM file located somewhere in the system32 directory. Problem with this file is not even an administrator can open it! NT locks it down as soon as it starts (anyone got a NTFS reader?) --- Daniel Glenfield <sp...@ho...> wrote: > > Thanks Ioannis, that's very interesting indeed! Does > windows keep these > encrypted passwords in a file then or memory somewhere? > > >From: "Ioannis Vranos" <iv...@em...> > >To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" > <dev...@li...> > >Subject: [Dev-C++] (no subject) > >Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:52:00 +0300 > > > >I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, so > I thought to drop > >it in here. > > > > > > > >From WinInfo Daily Update: > > > >=== 1. News and Views ==== > > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > > > >Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking > scheme, based > >on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them > crack most Windows > >passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method takes > more than a > >minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a growing > concern in > >the security community that the way in which Microsoft > encodes > >passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the > door for cracking > >programs to use brute-force methods to test and break > passwords. > > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, > recently published > >an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic > Time-Memory > >Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking > scheme. > >Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto > 2003, an > >international cryptology conference held this year at > the University > >of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the > International > >Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in > cooperation with the > >IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security > and Privacy. > > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on > MS-Windows > >password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB of > data (two > >CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all alphanumerical > passwords > >hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds > with the > >current approach using distinguished points. We show > that the gain > >could be even much higher depending on the parameters > used." > > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in > cracking Windows > >passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the > previous > >theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off > technique. They note > >that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when > encrypted, they > >don't include any random information. Thus, the same > password on two > >Windows machines will always be the same when encrypted, > which makes > >breaking the password encryption much easier than if the > passwords > >were randomized. > > Although generating more secure passwords by using > nonalphanumeric > >characters and other special characters is possible, the > researchers > >say that even this approach won't solve the inherent > problem in > >Windows because all they'd need is more time or a larger > data set (or > >both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, > Microsoft will have > >to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random > information, the > >researchers say. > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ioannis Vranos > > > >* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com > >* Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys > >* Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > .NET. > >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > >_______________________________________________ > >Dev-cpp-users mailing list > >Dev...@li... > >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN > Messenger today! > http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users ===== Signed David Mcken Life Sucks Live with it __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: David M. <ci...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 19:33:51
|
Being able to get the old is worse because the user will not notice that it has changed and a careful person can make it so that no (or rather very few) other traces are left. To make matters worse, many people re-use passwords (makes it easier to rember) --- Per Westermark <pw...@ia...> wrote: > One more thing - this information is about cracking a > password, i.e. > finding out what it is. If I don't bother, there are a > number of programs > available what will allow setting a new password without > knowing the old. > > /Per W > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > > > I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, > so I thought to drop > > it in here. > > > > > > > > >From WinInfo Daily Update: > > > > === 1. News and Views ==== > > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > > > > Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking > scheme, based > > on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them > crack most Windows > > passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method > takes more than a > > minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a > growing concern in > > the security community that the way in which Microsoft > encodes > > passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the > door for cracking > > programs to use brute-force methods to test and break > passwords. > > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, > recently published > > an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic > Time-Memory > > Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking > scheme. > > Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto > 2003, an > > international cryptology conference held this year at > the University > > of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the > International > > Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in > cooperation with the > > IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security > and Privacy. > > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on > MS-Windows > > password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB > of data (two > > CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all > alphanumerical passwords > > hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds > with the > > current approach using distinguished points. We show > that the gain > > could be even much higher depending on the parameters > used." > > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in > cracking Windows > > passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the > previous > > theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off > technique. They note > > that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when > encrypted, they > > don't include any random information. Thus, the same > password on two > > Windows machines will always be the same when > encrypted, which makes > > breaking the password encryption much easier than if > the passwords > > were randomized. > > Although generating more secure passwords by using > nonalphanumeric > > characters and other special characters is possible, > the researchers > > say that even this approach won't solve the inherent > problem in > > Windows because all they'd need is more time or a > larger data set (or > > both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, > Microsoft will have > > to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random > information, the > > researchers say. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ioannis Vranos > > > > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com > > * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys > > * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual > Studio .NET. > > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users ===== Signed David Mcken Life Sucks Live with it __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: David M. <ci...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 19:29:27
|
Indeed it is!! --- Ioannis Vranos <iv...@em...> wrote: > I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, so > I thought to drop > it in here. > > > > From WinInfo Daily Update: > > === 1. News and Views ==== > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > > Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking > scheme, based > on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them crack > most Windows > passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method takes > more than a > minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a growing > concern in > the security community that the way in which Microsoft > encodes > passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the door > for cracking > programs to use brute-force methods to test and break > passwords. > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, > recently published > an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic > Time-Memory > Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking > scheme. > Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto 2003, > an > international cryptology conference held this year at the > University > of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the > International > Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in > cooperation with the > IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security and > Privacy. > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on > MS-Windows > password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB of > data (two > CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all alphanumerical > passwords > hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds > with the > current approach using distinguished points. We show that > the gain > could be even much higher depending on the parameters > used." > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in cracking > Windows > passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the > previous > theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off > technique. They note > that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when > encrypted, they > don't include any random information. Thus, the same > password on two > Windows machines will always be the same when encrypted, > which makes > breaking the password encryption much easier than if the > passwords > were randomized. > Although generating more secure passwords by using > nonalphanumeric > characters and other special characters is possible, the > researchers > say that even this approach won't solve the inherent > problem in > Windows because all they'd need is more time or a larger > data set (or > both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, > Microsoft will have > to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random > information, the > researchers say. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------------- > > > > > > > Ioannis Vranos > > * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com > * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys > * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET > sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are > available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio > .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users ===== Signed David Mcken Life Sucks Live with it __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: David M. <ci...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 19:16:56
|
Any suggestions on how I can optimized the following
function?
void pc_char::write_to_all_pc(string to_send, bool
add_eoln)
{
map<string, pc_char *>::iterator i =
current_players.begin();
while (i != current_players.end()) {
(*i).second->write_to_player(to_send, add_eoln);
}
}
I was hoping to use for_each but kept coming across the
problem of "How the hell am I going to pass the arguments
to write_to_player?"
Thanks in Advance
=====
Signed
David Mcken
Life Sucks
Live with it
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
|
|
From: <and...@su...> - 2003-07-24 19:13:28
|
It worked fine. Thank you, Mr. Shylanath! Andre -----Mensagem original----- De: Abhijit Shylanath [mailto:mu...@gm...] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 24 de julho de 2003 15:52 Para: André Macário Barros; Dev-Cpp-Users Assunto: RE: [Dev-C++] 32-bit compiler > 2-In my application, I would preffer to run a command line compilation. > What > executable I can use and in what place can I get information (gcc -? and > g++ -? > don´t give the sintax) Try this: gcc -v --help > gcchelp.txt Then read gcchelp.txt. This will have the contents of the help screens for all gcc-used tools. -- Abhijit Shylanath Homepage: http://mudeth.tripod.com/ |
|
From: Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...> - 2003-07-24 18:56:51
|
> but if i try do delete the class, it will throw an exception. > In the destructor I do delete [] pDataArray; , with LocalFree() it is the same. The array you're trying to delete[] is statically allocated. You cannot free or delete[] or whatever it; it's part of the compiled executable itself. To realloc()/free(), etc., you'll need to dynamically allocate memory. Also, you mention that you're using threads. One good thing to do would be, after delete'ing, NULL the pointer so that delete attempts by other threads will not result in a page fault. -- Abhijit Shylanath Homepage: http://mudeth.tripod.com/ |
|
From: Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...> - 2003-07-24 18:50:56
|
> 2-In my application, I would preffer to run a command line compilation. > What > executable I can use and in what place can I get information (gcc -? and > g++ -? > don´t give the sintax) Try this: gcc -v --help > gcchelp.txt Then read gcchelp.txt. This will have the contents of the help screens for all gcc-used tools. -- Abhijit Shylanath Homepage: http://mudeth.tripod.com/ |
|
From: Jupercio J. <jup...@ya...> - 2003-07-24 18:19:58
|
Jupercio Juliano wrote: > When I tried do compile a new gtk project, I noticed that Dev-Cpp put > a Hello world code, I had a lot of problems and one of the, I think is > the main, is with the glibconfig.h include. > This file doesn't exist in my dev-cpp directory. I was wrong, the file, like many others, are in subdirectories of /dev-cpp/, what I didn't know is that some files are in /lib. Anyway thanks. greetings -- jupercio juliano ------------------------- Software Livre na cabeça: www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.pt.html www.br.debian.org/intro/about.pt.html www.cipsga.org.br Linux user 262957 - Debian GNU/Linux ICQ#71880027 - jupa no canal #debian-br em irc.debian.org ------------------------------------------------ "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" Debian Social Contract |
|
From: Christian W. <Chr...@vo...> - 2003-07-24 12:03:56
|
Hi List,
ich want to write a component to share data (PVOID) between threads.
I have a class defined like the following:
class CDataExchange
{
Public:
stuff....
private:
PVOID pDataArray[1000];
};
in the AddData member I look the number of entrys and reallocate memmory for
that pointer
realloc(pDataArry[n], nDataLength);
that works (i hope)...
but if i try do delete the class, it will throw an exception.
In the destructor I do delete [] pDataArray; , with LocalFree() it is the
same.
Does anybody has any hint for me ????
Thanks in advance
Christian
|
|
From: <or...@vp...> - 2003-07-24 08:38:36
|
Luc-Etienne Brachotte wrote: > In Dev-C++ 4.9.8.0, it seems impossible to link to GetFileVersionInfo > and GetFileVersionInfoSize. After searching, those two functions are not > present in any of the .h files. > > How to use them, or have the same functionality by other ways? > > Thanks. > The function's definition is located in winver.h Download the lates version of the win32api from http://www.mingw.org -- Greetings, Balázs |
|
From: <or...@vp...> - 2003-07-24 08:28:06
|
André Macário Barros wrote: > Dear Users, > > I will need to point the path of a 32-bit compiler to run a specific > application. > I will also need to compile some source codes from the /src app dir. > Looking at c:\dev-c++\bin I saw gcc, g++, c++ and other executables. > > 1-Where can I get information about these executables? > 2-In my application, I would preffer to run a command line compilation. > What > executable I can use and in what place can I get information (gcc -? and > g++ -? > don´t give the sintax) You are going to get at least 10 replys to this mail, but lets begin :) So, the compiler, what Dev-C++ uses, is the GNU Compiler Collection (formerly known as the GNU C Compiler). To get info on the compiler itself, visit http://gcc.gnu.org But you will likely won't get too much info from there, as that is the core homepage of GCC. GCC has been ported to many platforms and architectures, including Windows. To get info about the Windows port, visit http://www.mingw.org MinGW stands for Minimalist GNU for Windows. You will find everything you need there. Oh, and the gcc command line help is: "gcc --help" (double '-') Hope that helps. -- Greetings, Balázs |
|
From: Luc-Etienne B. <Luc...@wa...> - 2003-07-24 07:56:07
|
In Dev-C++ 4.9.8.0, it seems impossible to link to GetFileVersionInfo and GetFileVersionInfoSize. After searching, those two functions are not present in any of the .h files. How to use them, or have the same functionality by other ways? Thanks. |
|
From: Daniel G. <sp...@ho...> - 2003-07-24 06:20:33
|
Thanks Ioannis, that's very interesting indeed! Does windows keep these encrypted passwords in a file then or memory somewhere? >From: "Ioannis Vranos" <iv...@em...> >To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" <dev...@li...> >Subject: [Dev-C++] (no subject) >Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:52:00 +0300 > >I think this is interesting for everyone in the list, so I thought to drop >it in here. > > > >From WinInfo Daily Update: > >=== 1. News and Views ==== > by Paul Thurrott, thu...@wi... > >Researchers Crack Windows Passwords in Seconds > Swiss researchers have developed a password-cracking scheme, based >on a method first developed in 1980, that lets them crack most Windows >passwords in about 13 seconds (the original method takes more than a >minute and a half longer). The scheme enforces a growing concern in >the security community that the way in which Microsoft encodes >passwords in Windows is inherently weak, opening the door for cracking >programs to use brute-force methods to test and break passwords. > Philippe Oechslin, one of the Swiss researchers, recently published >an online paper, "Making a Faster Cryptanalytic Time-Memory >Trade-Off," which highlights the new password-cracking scheme. >Oechslin will present the paper in August at Crypto 2003, an >international cryptology conference held this year at the University >of California, Santa Barbara and organized by the International >Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR) in cooperation with the >IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security and Privacy. > "As an example, we have implemented an attack on MS-Windows >password hashes," the researchers write. "Using 1.4GB of data (two >CD-ROMs) we can crack 99.9 percent of all alphanumerical passwords >hashes ... in 13.6 seconds whereas it takes 101 seconds with the >current approach using distinguished points. We show that the gain >could be even much higher depending on the parameters used." > Oddly, the researchers weren't interested in cracking Windows >passwords but rather were trying to demonstrate the previous >theoretical cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off technique. They note >that Microsoft's passwords are weak because, when encrypted, they >don't include any random information. Thus, the same password on two >Windows machines will always be the same when encrypted, which makes >breaking the password encryption much easier than if the passwords >were randomized. > Although generating more secure passwords by using nonalphanumeric >characters and other special characters is possible, the researchers >say that even this approach won't solve the inherent problem in >Windows because all they'd need is more time or a larger data set (or >both) to crack those passwords as well. Instead, Microsoft will have >to fix this feature to encrypt passwords with random information, the >researchers say. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >----------------------- > > > > > > >Ioannis Vranos > >* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com >* Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys >* Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including >Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. >Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. >http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 >_______________________________________________ >Dev-cpp-users mailing list >Dev...@li... >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger |
|
From: Ioannis V. <iv...@em...> - 2003-07-24 02:22:22
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Per Westermark [mailto:pw...@ia...] > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 4:07 AM > To: Ioannis Vranos > Cc: Dev-C++ Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] (no subject) > > > One more thing - this information is about cracking a password, i.e. > finding out what it is. If I don't bother, there are a number > of programs > available what will allow setting a new password without > knowing the old. Yes but that in Windows XP/2000 SPsomething means that files encrypted via EFS become unreadable forever. But that's OT here I assume. :-) Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com * Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys * Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net |
|
From: <and...@su...> - 2003-07-24 01:35:49
|
Dear Users, I will need to point the path of a 32-bit compiler to run a specific application. I will also need to compile some source codes from the /src app dir. Looking at c:\dev-c++\bin I saw gcc, g++, c++ and other executables. 1-Where can I get information about these executables? 2-In my application, I would preffer to run a command line compilation. What executable I can use and in what place can I get information (gcc -? and g++ -? don´t give the sintax) Regards Andre |