dev-cpp-users — Dev-C++ users discussion list

Re: [Dev-C++] Mixed C and C++ Compilation?

[Alfred P. R. <al...@ya...>]

HI Issac,
 
You should add the SQLite files to the project, then go into the Project Options -> Compiler window and select compile as C for the SQLite sources.  You have to do that to each file individually.

"Isaac E. Wagner" <is...@wa...> wrote:
I've got a C++ project that requires a public domain C library (SQLite). I am trying to compile the library directly into the project, instead of linking to the library. I've tried compiling SQLite as a C++ project, but it generates tons of errors, so it really does need to be C compiled. Anyway, is there a way to add those files to my project, but have the C compiler invoked on them, and the C++ compiler invoked on the rest? <snip>



Alfred P. Reaud
 

[Dev-C++] Mixed C and C++ Compilation?

[Isaac E. W. <is...@wa...>]

I've got a C++ project that requires a public domain C library (SQLite). I am trying to compile the library directly into the project, instead of linking to the library. I've tried compiling SQLite as a C++ project, but it generates tons of errors, so it really does need to be C compiled. Anyway, is there a way to add those files to my project, but have the C compiler invoked on them, and the C++ compiler invoked on the rest? Does that make sense? Thanks!

[Dev-C++] Trouble with graphical interface to GDB -- no visible cursor

[Jonathan D.T. <tur...@ka...>]

Hi,
	
I'm trying to debug a program which I know produces a segfault at a certain 
point. I've set a number of breakpoints by clicking on the black band at the 
left of the editor window. When I click the purple checkmark icon to initiate 
debugging, there seems to be no visual clue as to current location in the 
program. If I click "run to cursor" several times, I get the expected segfault, 
but I never know where I am in the program, and clicking "Step Into" or "Next 
Step" seems to have no effect.

I've compiled the program with all optimizations disabled and with the -g option.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,
Jonathan Turkanis

[Dev-C++] *.dll: shared Memory for multiple instances of a dll ?

[Harald N. <no...@sb...>]

Hello!

I thought I can define a shared memory in a dll with the following command 
in the *.c file:

#pragma data_seg(".SHARDATA")
static HWND mainWindow = NULL;
static UINT message = 0;
#pragma data_seg()
#pragma comment(linker,"/SECTION:.SHARDATA,RWS")

but it has no effect :-(

in the linker options of the project stands following:

--no-export-all-symbols --add-stdcall-alias

what do I have to solve that problem?

THANKS for your help !!!!! 

Re: Fw: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Borland have always shipped  excellent help files - or at least used to,
since I haven't used any recent Borland compilers.

Of course a good online help should include operator precedence, just as
it should contain the runtime library reference, or at least a direct link
to a separately installed GNU documentation or similar.

What I meant by operator precedence being basic programming skill is that
I don't think that they are something that should require massive amounts
of googling for. For beginners they should be max two seconds away, and
for experienced programmers they should be "hard-coded" in memory. Any
person who works full-time programming C or C++ should be able to remember
the rules even if waked up in the middle of the night. That is one of the
cornerstones for writing bug-free code.

Most programming languages have very similar operator precedence rules,
which isn't so strange since most of the rules have been created as a
result of a bit of logic thinking and are based on non-programming rules
from the mathematics world.

About using massive amounts of parentheses in the source code, some
programmers feels that operator precedence is black magic and if they
don't clearly show the execution order neither the programmer self - or
any other programmer - will be able to later look at an expression and
deduce what it does.

It's fine by me if people want to be very clear when doing bit or shift
operators or similar, but I get a bit of an headache when
multiplication/division needs parentheses to convice the world that they
should be evaluated before addition/subtraction. The expressions below
have the big problem that it starts with four lpar making it very hard to
immediately keep track of the corresponding rpar.

One other thing I have noticed is that some programmers somehow think that
operator precedence isn't 100% fixed, but might vary between compilers,
and just because it works on "their" compiler they still feel a need for
parentheses to make sure the code is portable. I don't know if this has
something to do with parameter passing, where the compiler is free to
decide which order the parameters should be evaluated. What I mean is aa
construct like:
  int i = 0;
  printf("%d %d %d\n",i++,i++,i++);
where all bets are off about the resulting output. The funny thing with
the above code is of course that parentheses can't be used to solve the
problem anyway, so there really are no similarities with normal operator
precedence.

/Per W

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> O bye the way ......
>
> the fact that someone wrote
> x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
> y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;
>
> is a clear indication that people that do "programming micro-controller with C" more than I do and I was
> able to pick up the correction show that not everyone is up to speed with operator precedence.
>
>
> A very good reason why this should included in upgrade version of [Dev-C++]  help notes after all
> Borlands have done it and they are not a "fly by night - half measure company"
>
>
> >From Eric
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
> To: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence
>
>
> OK
>
> It is just that I don't do C++ full time nor do I programming micro-controller with C full time, A
> employment option in ether direction would be great !!! :)
>
> This is why I have kept the C++ notes in folder and refer to them and upgrade them from time to time as
> needed,
>
> The only reason why I made a posting is so I could find (and others as well) the operator precedence
> order in the help file if I need to and don't have access to my notes, I am sure you Per Westermark would
> not need them but other people might find it useful and stop them posting to this group on a trivial
> problem using operator precedence.
>
> After all I did see a "Hello world" example in the help files briefly while looking for something else.
>
> Also I do realize that operator precedence (and did while I was at school) that the operator precedence
> does not change between local and global variables, it was (it the time) a reminder that in a function a
> global variable would be ignored if there was a local variable defined in that function.
>
> >From Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
> To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
> Cc: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence
>
>
> Knowing thee precendence rules are part of basic programming skills.
>
> Anyway, there are _no_ precedence difference between auto and global
> variables when evaluating an expression.
>
> There is, of course, a difference in the time when the
> constructors/destructors will be run for variables declared global, auto
> or dyanmically allocated.
>
> /Wer W
>
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:
>
> > Hi I belong to a micro-controller group,
> >
> >
> > someone in the group presented a formula (which might not be the problem to their question)
> > x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
> > y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;
> >
> >
> > I told them it could be written as
> > x = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)%8;
> > y = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)/8;
> >
> >
> > if they look on the "Operator Precedence chart"
> >
> > it took me a while to remember I had printed off the Operator Precedence chart from the Borland help
> > files, for my own C++ notes (while I was at C++, school)
> >
> > While you can find the Operator Precedence chart on Internet with the help of Google, a couple of web
> > sites I have seen does not tell that most Operator Precedence level (16 in all) go from left to right,
> > but there are three that go from right to left, level 2, 13  and 15.
> >
> >
> > Hand written on the bottom of the page is a reminder local variables take precedence over global
> > variables (I was at school at the time when I wrote the notes, OK)
> >
> >
> >
> > The Aim of this posting is a suggestion this could included in the (dev-C++) help files on future
> > upgrades unless I am using a old version you can correct me and I would be grateful.
> >
> >
> > >From Eric Richards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Fw: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence

[Eric <eri...@cl...>]

O bye the way ......

the fact that someone wrote
x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;

is a clear indication that people that do "programming micro-controller with C" more than I do and I was
able to pick up the correction show that not everyone is up to speed with operator precedence.


A very good reason why this should included in upgrade version of [Dev-C++]  help notes after all
Borlands have done it and they are not a "fly by night - half measure company"


From Eric



----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence


OK

It is just that I don't do C++ full time nor do I programming micro-controller with C full time, A
employment option in ether direction would be great !!! :)

This is why I have kept the C++ notes in folder and refer to them and upgrade them from time to time as
needed,

The only reason why I made a posting is so I could find (and others as well) the operator precedence
order in the help file if I need to and don't have access to my notes, I am sure you Per Westermark would
not need them but other people might find it useful and stop them posting to this group on a trivial
problem using operator precedence.

After all I did see a "Hello world" example in the help files briefly while looking for something else.

Also I do realize that operator precedence (and did while I was at school) that the operator precedence
does not change between local and global variables, it was (it the time) a reminder that in a function a
global variable would be ignored if there was a local variable defined in that function.

From Eric








----- Original Message -----
From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence


Knowing thee precendence rules are part of basic programming skills.

Anyway, there are _no_ precedence difference between auto and global
variables when evaluating an expression.

There is, of course, a difference in the time when the
constructors/destructors will be run for variables declared global, auto
or dyanmically allocated.

/Wer W

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> Hi I belong to a micro-controller group,
>
>
> someone in the group presented a formula (which might not be the problem to their question)
> x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
> y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;
>
>
> I told them it could be written as
> x = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)%8;
> y = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)/8;
>
>
> if they look on the "Operator Precedence chart"
>
> it took me a while to remember I had printed off the Operator Precedence chart from the Borland help
> files, for my own C++ notes (while I was at C++, school)
>
> While you can find the Operator Precedence chart on Internet with the help of Google, a couple of web
> sites I have seen does not tell that most Operator Precedence level (16 in all) go from left to right,
> but there are three that go from right to left, level 2, 13  and 15.
>
>
> Hand written on the bottom of the page is a reminder local variables take precedence over global
> variables (I was at school at the time when I wrote the notes, OK)
>
>
>
> The Aim of this posting is a suggestion this could included in the (dev-C++) help files on future
> upgrades unless I am using a old version you can correct me and I would be grateful.
>
>
> >From Eric Richards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence

[Eric <eri...@cl...>]

OK

It is just that I don't do C++ full time nor do I programming micro-controller with C full time, A
employment option in ether direction would be great !!! :)

This is why I have kept the C++ notes in folder and refer to them and upgrade them from time to time as
needed,

The only reason why I made a posting is so I could find (and others as well) the operator precedence
order in the help file if I need to and don't have access to my notes, I am sure you Per Westermark would
not need them but other people might find it useful and stop them posting to this group on a trivial
problem using operator precedence.

After all I did see a "Hello world" example in the help files briefly while looking for something else.

Also I do realize that operator precedence (and did while I was at school) that the operator precedence
does not change between local and global variables, it was (it the time) a reminder that in a function a
global variable would be ignored if there was a local variable defined in that function.

From Eric








----- Original Message -----
From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence


Knowing thee precendence rules are part of basic programming skills.

Anyway, there are _no_ precedence difference between auto and global
variables when evaluating an expression.

There is, of course, a difference in the time when the
constructors/destructors will be run for variables declared global, auto
or dyanmically allocated.

/Wer W

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> Hi I belong to a micro-controller group,
>
>
> someone in the group presented a formula (which might not be the problem to their question)
> x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
> y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;
>
>
> I told them it could be written as
> x = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)%8;
> y = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)/8;
>
>
> if they look on the "Operator Precedence chart"
>
> it took me a while to remember I had printed off the Operator Precedence chart from the Borland help
> files, for my own C++ notes (while I was at C++, school)
>
> While you can find the Operator Precedence chart on Internet with the help of Google, a couple of web
> sites I have seen does not tell that most Operator Precedence level (16 in all) go from left to right,
> but there are three that go from right to left, level 2, 13  and 15.
>
>
> Hand written on the bottom of the page is a reminder local variables take precedence over global
> variables (I was at school at the time when I wrote the notes, OK)
>
>
>
> The Aim of this posting is a suggestion this could included in the (dev-C++) help files on future
> upgrades unless I am using a old version you can correct me and I would be grateful.
>
>
> >From Eric Richards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04

Re: [Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Knowing thee precendence rules are part of basic programming skills.

Anyway, there are _no_ precedence difference between auto and global
variables when evaluating an expression.

There is, of course, a difference in the time when the
constructors/destructors will be run for variables declared global, auto
or dyanmically allocated.

/Wer W

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> Hi I belong to a micro-controller group,
>
>
> someone in the group presented a formula (which might not be the problem to their question)
> x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
> y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;
>
>
> I told them it could be written as
> x = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)%8;
> y = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)/8;
>
>
> if they look on the "Operator Precedence chart"
>
> it took me a while to remember I had printed off the Operator Precedence chart from the Borland help
> files, for my own C++ notes (while I was at C++, school)
>
> While you can find the Operator Precedence chart on Internet with the help of Google, a couple of web
> sites I have seen does not tell that most Operator Precedence level (16 in all) go from left to right,
> but there are three that go from right to left, level 2, 13  and 15.
>
>
> Hand written on the bottom of the page is a reminder local variables take precedence over global
> variables (I was at school at the time when I wrote the notes, OK)
>
>
>
> The Aim of this posting is a suggestion this could included in the (dev-C++) help files on future
> upgrades unless I am using a old version you can correct me and I would be grateful.
>
>
> >From Eric Richards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

[Dev-C++] help files and Operator Precedence

[Eric <eri...@cl...>]

Hi I belong to a micro-controller group,


someone in the group presented a formula (which might not be the problem to their question)
x = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)%8;
y = ((((mm-1)*31)+dd)-1)/8;


I told them it could be written as
x = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)%8;
y = ((mm-1)*31+dd-1)/8;


if they look on the "Operator Precedence chart"

it took me a while to remember I had printed off the Operator Precedence chart from the Borland help
files, for my own C++ notes (while I was at C++, school)

While you can find the Operator Precedence chart on Internet with the help of Google, a couple of web
sites I have seen does not tell that most Operator Precedence level (16 in all) go from left to right,
but there are three that go from right to left, level 2, 13  and 15.


Hand written on the bottom of the page is a reminder local variables take precedence over global
variables (I was at school at the time when I wrote the notes, OK)



The Aim of this posting is a suggestion this could included in the (dev-C++) help files on future
upgrades unless I am using a old version you can correct me and I would be grateful.


From Eric Richards








---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.809 / Virus Database: 551 - Release Date: 09-Dec-04

Re: [Dev-C++] Trouble with string library?

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Forst of all - i assume you mean #include <string> since "string" means an
application-specific file instead of a system include file.

Next - exactly what problems do you have?

/Per W

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, robert gasson wrote:

> Has any else had trouble with '#include "string"' with Dev-Cpp 4.9.9.0?  I
> get error messages pertaining to the components of the string class. What
> else is wrong?  Any fixes available?

[Dev-C++] Trouble with string library?

[robert g. <rg...@ho...>]

Has any else had trouble with '#include "string"' with Dev-Cpp 4.9.9.0?  I 
get error messages pertaining to the components of the string class. What 
else is wrong?  Any fixes available?

Re[2]: [Dev-C++] GCC version

[Raw M. D. C. <pe...@ra...>]

Hello Michal,

> use WebUpdate

Thanks, I had to select devpaks.org for it to show the GCC files,
didnt show it for the other selection.


-- 
Best regards,
 Peter                            mailto:pe...@ra...

Re: [Dev-C++] GCC version

[Michal M. <mi...@mo...>]

Raw Magick DOT COM wrote:
> The version of GCC which comes with Dev-CPP is quite old 3.3.1, does
> anyone have the procedure for updating all the binaries without
> mucking it all up?

use WebUpdate

-- 
Regards,
     Michal

[Dev-C++] GCC version

[Raw M. D. C. <pe...@ra...>]

Hi,

The version of GCC which comes with Dev-CPP is quite old 3.3.1, does
anyone have the procedure for updating all the binaries without
mucking it all up?


-- 
Best regards,
 Peter                            mailto:pe...@ra...

Re: AW: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1 with wxWindows 2.4.2

[Siva C. <siv...@ya...>]

hello achim,

I am sure I did not change anything else. I am
currently using it without any problems!

As you point out, 2.4.2 has a single huge monolith
library file. So how does order of linking come in
here? Does this suggest that the error is due to
something else? If yes, then what is it? Is this
related to gcc itself?

Siva Chandra.

--- atm <at...@su...> wrote:

> hi,
> 
> are you shure, you didn't change anything else?
> got similar problems while changing from wx 2.4.2 to
> 2.5.x
> and fixed it, playing around with the linking order.
> You might not have this problem, because 2.4.2's
> just working with
> mainly one "monolith" library, but the other libs
> (comiler...),
> you have to link against, will need thier order too.
> 
> Have look to:
>
http://lists.wxwidgets.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?8:sss:62043:200407:idibmoffciml
> nechjpko#b
> or
>
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=95&highlight=vtable
> or
>
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=307&highlight=vtabl
> e
> or
>
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=10&highlight=vtable
> 
> hope it helps
> 
> cheers
> achim



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 

AW: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1 with wxWindows 2.4.2

[atm <at...@su...>]

hi,

are you shure, you didn't change anything else?
got similar problems while changing from wx 2.4.2 to 2.5.x
and fixed it, playing around with the linking order.
You might not have this problem, because 2.4.2's just working with
mainly one "monolith" library, but the other libs (comiler...),
you have to link against, will need thier order too.

Have look to:
http://lists.wxwidgets.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?8:sss:62043:200407:idibmoffciml
nechjpko#b
or
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=95&highlight=vtable
or
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=307&highlight=vtabl
e
or
http://www.solidsteel.nl/users/wxwidgets/viewtopic.php?t=10&highlight=vtable

hope it helps

cheers
achim


> Hi,
> Recently, I installed the newest version of Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1.
> I create a new wxWindows 2.4.2  project with only the template.
> After compiling, I got the following error message.
> I did not have this error message with Dev-C++ 4.9.9.0.
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Edward
> // ******************************************
>
> make.exe -f "E:\dev_projects\Makefile.win" all
> g++.exe -c main.cpp -o
ain.o -I"e:/Dev-Cpp/include/c++"  -I"e:/Dev-Cpp/include/c++/mingw32"  -I"e:/
Dev-Cpp/include/c++/backward"  -I"e:/Dev-Cpp/include"

> -I"E:/Dev-Cpp/include/tnt_jama"  -DWINVER=0x0400 -D__WIN95__ -D__GNUWIN32_
_ -D__WIN32__ -DHAVE_W32API_H  -D__WXMSW__ -D__WINDOWS__ -Wall -fno-pcc-stru
ct-> > return -O2 -Os -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
> windres.exe -i test1_private.rc --input-format=rc -o test1_private.res -O
coff
> g++.exe main.o test1_private.res -o
"test1.exe" -L"e:/Dev-Cpp/lib" -mwindows -Wl,--subsystem,windows -mwindows -
lwxmsw -lstdc++ -lgcc -lodbc32 -lwsock32 -> >
lwinspool -lwinmm -lshell32 -lcomctl32 -lctl3d32 -ladvapi32 -lopengl32 -lglu
32 -lole32 -loleaut32 -luuid
> e:/Dev-Cpp/lib/libwxmsw.a(mdi.o)(.data$_ZTV14wxMenuItemList+0x0):mdi.cpp:
multiple definition of `vtable for wxMenuItemList'
> main.o(.rdata$_ZTV14wxMenuItemList+0x0):main.cpp: first defined here
> make.exe: *** [test1.exe] Error 1
> // ******************************************

Re: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1 with wxWindows 2.4.2

[Siva C. <siv...@ya...>]

Hello,

I am not sure if the problem is between Dev-C++
4.9.9.1 and 4.9.9.0. They both have the same compiler
system, gcc-3.3.1(mingw special). I had a similar
problem while upgrading from 4.9.8.x to 4.9.9.0. All I
had to do to sort this problem was to download the
DevPak for 4.9.9.0 from this site:
http://michel.weinachter.free.fr/

... and it solved my problem. I am able to use
comfortably with 4.9.9.1 also!

Hope this helps,
Siva Chandra.

*********************************
*********************************
Hi,

Recently, I installed the newest version of Dev-C++
4.9.9.1.

I create a new wxWindows 2.4.2  project with only the
template.

After compiling, I got the following error message.

I did not have this error message with Dev-C++
4.9.9.0.

Any help is appreciated.
***


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1 with wxWindows 2.4.2

[Alfred P. R. <al...@ya...>]

Hi Edward,
 
This is being reported on the wxWidgets forums, search for "multiple definition of `vtable for wxMenuItemList'".  A solution is proposed on Jul 12, 2004 15:02.
 
Another possible solution is to use grep -r 'vtable' * in the library folder of Dev-Cpp to find where vtable is actually replicated, then exclude that library if possible.  That grep on my devcpp (4.9.9.0) install, which doesn't have wxWidgets currently installed, mind you, gives the results:
Binary file gcc-lib/mingw32/3.3.1/cc1.exe matches
Binary file gcc-lib/mingw32/3.3.1/cc1obj.exe matches
Binary file gcc-lib/mingw32/3.3.1/cc1plus.exe matches
Binary file libbfd.a matches
Binary file libiberty.a matches
Binary file libstdc++.a matches
Binary file libsupc++.a matches
 
Good luck Edward! 

fe...@ms... wrote:

Hi,

Recently, I installed the newest version of Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1.

I create a new wxWindows 2.4.2  project with only the template.

After compiling, I got the following error message.

I did not have this error message with Dev-C++ 4.9.9.0.

Any help is appreciated.

Edward

<snip>






Alfred P. Reaud
 

Re: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message

[Noorez K. <dar...@ho...>]

That worked. Thanks!

>From: "Mohammed" <mi...@ac...>
>To: <dev...@li...>
>Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message
>Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:46:31 +0300
>
>The problem is not in your compiler but in your code. There's a missing
>closing "}" somewhere in your sourcecode.
>
>
>Mohammed
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Noorez Kassam <dar...@ho...>
>To: <dev...@li...>
>Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 11:20 PM
>Subject: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message
>
>
> > I just downloaded the new version of dev-cpp. When I try to compile to
> > produces the executable but there is a warning message saying that there
>was
> > no new line at the end of file, even though i put a ton of lines at the
>end
> > of the program!
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your inbound and 
>outbound
> > e-mail and attachments.
> >
>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=htt
>p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
> >   Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
> > first two months FREE*.
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Dev-cpp-users mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

_________________________________________________________________
Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your inbound and outbound 
e-mail and attachments. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.

[Dev-C++] Dev-C++ 4.9.9.1 with wxWindows 2.4.2

[<fe...@ms...>]
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Re: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

This is the reason why the error message should be generated. A number of
tools doesn't correctly handle files where the last line doesn't end with
a '\n' and the compiler want to inform that the source versioning sysmte
for example may check in broken files.

/Per W

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Len Philpot wrote:

> > The problem is not in your compiler but in your code. There's a
> > missing closing "}" somewhere in your sourcecode.
>
> I've also seen this when there wasn't a blank line at the end of a
> file. For example :
>
> 	return 0;
> }<EOF>
>
> Adding :
>
> 	return 0;
> }<\n>
> <EOF>
>
> ...eliminated the problem.
>
> --
>  Len Philpot                          ><>
>  le...@ph...       http://philpot.org/
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Re: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message

[Len P. <le...@ph...>]

> The problem is not in your compiler but in your code. There's a
> missing closing "}" somewhere in your sourcecode.

I've also seen this when there wasn't a blank line at the end of a 
file. For example :

	return 0;
}<EOF>

Adding :

	return 0;
}<\n>
<EOF>

...eliminated the problem.

-- 
 Len Philpot                          ><> 
 le...@ph...       http://philpot.org/

Re: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message

[Mohammed <mi...@ac...>]

The problem is not in your compiler but in your code. There's a missing
closing "}" somewhere in your sourcecode.


Mohammed
----- Original Message -----
From: Noorez Kassam <dar...@ho...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: [Dev-C++] can't get rid of warning message


> I just downloaded the new version of dev-cpp. When I try to compile to
> produces the executable but there is a warning message saying that ther=
e
was
> no new line at the end of file, even though i put a ton of lines at the
end
> of the program!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your inbound and outbo=
und
> e-mail and attachments.
>
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=3Den-ca&page=3Dbyoa/prem&xAPID=3D1994&DI=3D=
1034&SU=3Dhtt
p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=3DMarket_MSNIS_Taglines
>   Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN=AE Premium right now and get t=
he
> first two months FREE*.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Re: [Dev-C++] Different Build Configurations?

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Join the club :)

This is a much wanted feature. I normally include own Makefile extensions
for this, but an integration into the IDE would be much appreciated.

/Per W

On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Christian Jacob wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> I wondered whether it is possible to simply add different build
> configurations to a project.
>
> In VS, I used this feature to add a release build and a debug build for
> instance. Also, it was great that I could set options that would be used
> for every build configuration.
>
> If there were custom build steps such as versioning or whatever, I
> simply added them into the global build configuration section and within
> the configurations for debug and release build I added whatever
> distinguished both (e.g. debug library or release library linked to the
> project, etc.)
>
> How do I achieve this best with DevC++?
>
> Regards,
> Tronex.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Re: [Dev-C++] CPU window

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Have you tried to run any stand-alone front ends for the gdb? They have a
lot of extra debugging features not directly available in the Dev-C++ IDE.

/Per W

On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Raw Magick DOT COM wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The CPU window is pretty ropey compared to the version in Delphi, which
> lists the line of code and then the asm for it.
>
> Is there actually a way to do this, but it isnt implemented yet? If so
> maybe I could look at it myself as I have been coding in Delphi since
> version 1. Also had quite a bit of experience in BASM.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>