Not yet? Anyway, I am still confused with two sets of options and only one difference. See above. D[define]=value is quite useful, though. Now what the hell is there in that .o if Linker cant find it but not the only method in it?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
See what above? How is that relevant? Are you referring to your other thread perhaps? Confused.
> Now what the hell is there in that .o if Linker
> cant find it but not the only method in it?
Now what the hell are you talking about now!? I don't understand the question even allowing for the garbled grammar. Don't ignore the advice in your other thread about testing the understandability of your posts. We can answer your questions is you help yourself. If you have a build error post the log dammit!
w.r.t. ActiveX, I can find no reference to using MinGW for ActiveX (other than a lot of people asking the same question but getting little response).
Clifford
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Any ready made template for ActiveX? More complex patterns like wizards?
Not yet? Anyway, I am still confused with two sets of options and only one difference. See above. D[define]=value is quite useful, though. Now what the hell is there in that .o if Linker cant find it but not the only method in it?
> See above.
See what above? How is that relevant? Are you referring to your other thread perhaps? Confused.
> Now what the hell is there in that .o if Linker
> cant find it but not the only method in it?
Now what the hell are you talking about now!? I don't understand the question even allowing for the garbled grammar. Don't ignore the advice in your other thread about testing the understandability of your posts. We can answer your questions is you help yourself. If you have a build error post the log dammit!
w.r.t. ActiveX, I can find no reference to using MinGW for ActiveX (other than a lot of people asking the same question but getting little response).
Clifford