I've been helping out with wx-devcpp and came across something that I think would be useful for dev-cpp too.
From what I can tell (and I could be completely off-base here), devpaks don't have any way to include macros in the .dev files that are changed to reflect the true dev-cpp installation directory. For example, if a user had installed dev-cpp in a non-default directory (e.g. c:\example), a devpak that includes .dev files hard-coded for c:\dev-cpp will not work. The change I made will parse .dev files for the macro %DEVCPP_DIR% and replace it with the actual dev-cpp installation directory.
All I did was change project.pas like so:
Line 895:
fOptions.ResourceIncludes.DelimitedText := Read('ResourceIncludes', '');
Change to:
fOptions.ResourceIncludes.DelimitedText :=
StringReplace(Read('ResourceIncludes', ''),
'%DEVCPP_DIR%', devDirs.Default, [rfReplaceAll]);
I can send the changes for people to review if this is of interest.
-Tony
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Tony,
that functionality is in dev-c++ code already
If you want to look for list of macros I believe it's in macros.pas
as examples see my gtk examples devpak on devpaks.org
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I see the code in macro.pas. It looks like <DEVCPP> should be replaced by the directory where devcpp was installed. However, when I add this to my .dev file, it does not get replaced.
For example, in my .dev file, I added:
ResourceIncludes=<DEVCPP>include
However, when I load the project into DevCpp, it doesn't get replaced (I still see <DEVCPP>include in Project Options->Directories->Resource Directories).
Is there something I'm missing here?
-Tony
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
you need to lookup the code. it doesn't work for all windows
afair: for includes it does, but for libs it does not.
it needs to be fixed, one thing I'm almost positive is that we're not going to do that windows style (%), but unix style: $VARIABLE or ${SOME_VARIABLE}. Another option would be to evaluate it through some unix shell, that way things like wx-config --libs could work too
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I've been helping out with wx-devcpp and came across something that I think would be useful for dev-cpp too.
From what I can tell (and I could be completely off-base here), devpaks don't have any way to include macros in the .dev files that are changed to reflect the true dev-cpp installation directory. For example, if a user had installed dev-cpp in a non-default directory (e.g. c:\example), a devpak that includes .dev files hard-coded for c:\dev-cpp will not work. The change I made will parse .dev files for the macro %DEVCPP_DIR% and replace it with the actual dev-cpp installation directory.
All I did was change project.pas like so:
Line 895:
fOptions.ResourceIncludes.DelimitedText := Read('ResourceIncludes', '');
Change to:
fOptions.ResourceIncludes.DelimitedText :=
StringReplace(Read('ResourceIncludes', ''),
'%DEVCPP_DIR%', devDirs.Default, [rfReplaceAll]);
I can send the changes for people to review if this is of interest.
-Tony
Tony,
that functionality is in dev-c++ code already
If you want to look for list of macros I believe it's in macros.pas
as examples see my gtk examples devpak on devpaks.org
I see the code in macro.pas. It looks like <DEVCPP> should be replaced by the directory where devcpp was installed. However, when I add this to my .dev file, it does not get replaced.
For example, in my .dev file, I added:
ResourceIncludes=<DEVCPP>include
However, when I load the project into DevCpp, it doesn't get replaced (I still see <DEVCPP>include in Project Options->Directories->Resource Directories).
Is there something I'm missing here?
-Tony
you need to lookup the code. it doesn't work for all windows
afair: for includes it does, but for libs it does not.
it needs to be fixed, one thing I'm almost positive is that we're not going to do that windows style (%), but unix style: $VARIABLE or ${SOME_VARIABLE}. Another option would be to evaluate it through some unix shell, that way things like
wx-config --libs
could work too