Do you consider possible, or know a way of using the Dev-C++ IDE for Ada code development? Just wondering...I have searched for a couple of alternatives, but none seems to provide the same features than Dev-C++ IDE, or limit the amount of code you can actually handle.
Greetings, VH
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Did you consider what happen if I post the same question on the other forums? I didn"t judge appropriate to post it on the User's one, for if I do you guys would probably fry me alive (justifiably though). I think that the possible implementation of an Ada related feature in Dev-C++ has more to do with its development than with its use. Just think, no matter how I use the IDE, I will not probably succeeed in compiling an Ada program unless the development team implements those features directly linked to the Ada compiler.
AdaGide? Yeap, I have lurked around long enough to come into it a couple of times, and honestly "writing", it appears as a good alternative. However, I thought that including options for Ada compilation into Dev-C++ would certainly make much more versatile. I hope nobody takes this as a critic to Dev-C++ at all: the IDE stands on its own, and I actually shifted to it for regular C-C++ coding.
Greetings, VH
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Colin:
Do you consider possible, or know a way of using the Dev-C++ IDE for Ada code development? Just wondering...I have searched for a couple of alternatives, but none seems to provide the same features than Dev-C++ IDE, or limit the amount of code you can actually handle.
Greetings, VH
Victor,
Isn't this a little off-topic for the developer's forum?
I take it for granted by the way that you have tried AdaGIDE?
Wayne
Wayne:
Glad to read from you...Now, going to business:
Did you consider what happen if I post the same question on the other forums? I didn"t judge appropriate to post it on the User's one, for if I do you guys would probably fry me alive (justifiably though). I think that the possible implementation of an Ada related feature in Dev-C++ has more to do with its development than with its use. Just think, no matter how I use the IDE, I will not probably succeeed in compiling an Ada program unless the development team implements those features directly linked to the Ada compiler.
AdaGide? Yeap, I have lurked around long enough to come into it a couple of times, and honestly "writing", it appears as a good alternative. However, I thought that including options for Ada compilation into Dev-C++ would certainly make much more versatile. I hope nobody takes this as a critic to Dev-C++ at all: the IDE stands on its own, and I actually shifted to it for regular C-C++ coding.
Greetings, VH