Re: [Denovoassembler-devel] Why flush both k-mer and its complement?

[David E. (gringer) <dav...@mp...>]

On 21/07/11 17:07, David Eccles (gringer) wrote:
> Okay, I've attached a patch that just does the flush twice without any
> additional reverse complelements.

Er, sorry, that patch seems to alter the coverage distribution. The unit 
tests I was able to do were successful, but I guess the coverage was 
important this time.

phix_5k_1/2 with patch:

http://pastebin.com/1nnezJrQ

phix_5k_1/2 without patch:

http://pastebin.com/d3PNUBfQ

-- David