From: Jaroslav S. <jsk...@re...> - 2012-09-04 07:13:49
|
Hi, thanks for your reply > For ddccontrol-db, COPYING also contains GPLv2, but we do not put any > copyright header in the files contributed by ourselves or users, so > I'm > not clear if we meant GPLv2+ or just GPLv2 (or even public domain, > actually). > Actually it could be GPL+ as the GPLv2 license text states: If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. Also confirmed by our Fedora licensing wiki / guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F > I'd say the conservative option is GPLv2. But I assume no one would > be > offended if you put GPLv2+. > Therefore we will use GPLv2+ to be consistent with ddccontrol package thanks & regards Jaroslav |