From: Andreas V. <li...@br...> - 2010-04-21 07:00:10
|
Am Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:18:34 -0400 schrieb Jason Glasgow: Yes, do this. It features the direct C++ object transport wrapper. It's very comfortable to access it in this way and much easier to replace Dbus-C++ in your application with another transport layer if ever needed. But note that the C++ object transport it's yet optimised for throughput. So if you transport large vectors measure the data copy loss! I've some ideas how to optimise this, but not yet had the time. read this: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/dbus-cplusplus/wiki/Introspection%20Format regards Andreas > Thanks for the update. Sounds bad the fdo is such a pain. We'll > start looking at the gitorious code. > -Jason > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Andreas Volz <li...@br...> > wrote: > > > Am Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:01:04 -0400 schrieb Jason Glasgow: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would do it, but for some reasons I couldn't commit. It seems fdo > > doesn't accept my ssh keys. It was the hell to get some commit > > access from fdo. :-( > > > > Not sure if I've the time to trouble again with fdo to find the > > problem. If I don't find a solution, development will continue in > > gitorious branch only.. |