Re: [dbus-cplusplus-devel] Server's copy-constructor

[P. D. <sh...@gm...>]

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Ignacy Gawedzki <sf...@qu...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little question while I'm skimming the source code: what's the point with
> the protected copy-constructor of Server?  I'm not asking why it is protected,
> but why doesn't it do anything with the _pvt attribute, which remains 0.
>
it's just the C++ way of disallowing copies (but it should be private
and not protected to make it clear, sorry)

since there can't be copies around (they won't even work since their
on_new_connection() would never be called, and honestly i can't see a
use case where you'd need to do that anyway) the private smart pointer
is useless, it could be a regular pointer

feel free to throw that class away and rewrite it :-)