[dbfpy-devel] [ dbfpy-Bugs-3065292 ] y2k fix proposed

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #3065292, was opened at 2010-09-13 17:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jno-
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=746843&aid=3065292&group_id=140566

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: jno (jno-)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: y2k fix proposed

Initial Comment:
Some applications still use DBF. This is a matter of fact.
But the DBF is not supposed to handle Y2K+ dates. But it does.
But the dbfpy cannot handle them. But it should.
So, I propose a [incomplete] fix to utils.getDate().

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=746843&aid=3065292&group_id=140566