From: Vitaly O. <vy...@vz...> - 2003-07-01 11:30:56
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:36:54 +0800 James Devenish <j-d...@us...> wrote: > In message <200...@vz...> > on Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:03AM +0400, Vitaly Ostanin wrote: > > > I expect that we would actually keep a generated copy in > > > the CVS repository, > > > > For what? This way keep information twice and not synced :( > > It is quite common for projects to have a number of generated > files that are kept in CVS along with their source files. For a > start, this allows casual developers to avoid requiring > peculiar dependencies or extremely long bootstrap processes > when using the CVS files. Moreover, it provides the `diff` and > revision history advantages of CVS. Ok. Please, tell me - do you want to do syncronization with current DocBook l10n ? I have patch for l10n.xml for escaping l10n values to LaTeX valid text. But ru.xml is really old :(( -- Regards, Vyt mailto: vy...@vz... JID: vy...@vz... |