From: Steinar B. <sb...@do...> - 2003-03-19 21:48:12
|
>>>>> James Devenish <j-d...@us...>: > Exactly my point :) Yah! I really shouldn't post to mailing lists when I'm too sleepy to read and understand the message I'm responding to. :-) But I least I posted my real life example, which is to use the role when the <imageobject> elements are otherwise indistinguishable. Ie. when they have the same @format value. > Elsewhere in DB2LaTeX there is already use of @role="tex". What > makes me uncertain about it is that our imagedata handling won't > work with plain TeX, so "tex" is a bit of a misnomer. I agree. > We could easily accept either "tex" or "latex", but a decision would > have to be made about whether this was appopriate :) How about accepting both "tex" and "latex" for the places where it's already in use, for legacy reasons, but mark it as deprecated in the docs, and only accept "latex" for the new places? |