From: James D. <j-d...@us...> - 2003-03-19 01:26:52
|
In message <87n...@do...> on Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:31:52PM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote: > >>>>> James Devenish <j-d...@us...>: > > > - If we are to support $use.role.for.mediaobject and > > $preferred.mediaobject.role, we would have to choose a role (such > > as the existing 'html' or 'fo') that corresponds to DB2LaTeX/LaTeX. > > Why not use a new role value? "tex"? Or "latex"? Then you could add > a new <imageobject> for use by DB2LaTeX. Exactly my point :) Elsewhere in DB2LaTeX there is already use of @role="tex". What makes me uncertain about it is that our imagedata handling won't work with plain TeX, so "tex" is a bit of a misnomer. We could easily accept either "tex" or "latex", but a decision would have to be made about whether this was appopriate :) |