Re: [Datadraw-user] New DataDraw computer language - Grail

[Bill C. <bi...@bi...>]

On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 09:58 -0500, Richard Prescott wrote:
> Could that be implemented with reference counts?
> 
> 
> yes, absolutely
> 
> 
> About decorator and patches
> 
> Well, ok then.  At least I tried.

I'm thinking of implementing strings, vectors, matrices, and dynamic
arrays so that they act like built-in value-types like int.  I would be
a great test of how extensible the compiler is to write all that in a
library.  If that works out, I doubt it would be hard to implement your
decorator library.

Regards,
Bill