From: Davide C. <daw...@gm...> - 2007-10-12 20:05:13
|
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:40 PM, Niko Efthymiou wrote: > On Friday 12 October 2007, davide cittaro wrote: >> Hi again,I was trying to better understand how ESOM tools work and >> perform. I tried with a well-known data set: Iris classification. I >> used the one provided in Weka, converted in iris.lrn+iris.cls. >> I tried a standard esom training run, with a 64x64 map, 30 epochs, 31 >> starting radius and default values for all the rest... > > 64x64 is way too large for the iris data set. The set is only 55 > samples > vs. 4096 neurons... > > 24x24 or 16x32 are a starting point. Also don't forget to > preprocess the > data. ZT and Robust-ZT which are builtin the esom tools are a start, > but there might be more sopfisticated transformations. > Oh great! Thank you! Is there some recommendation about neurons/ samples ratio? > >> Hi again, and sorry for bothering one more time.I've been reading >> "Emergence in Self Organizing Feature Maps" (Ultsch A.) and I figured >> out that I may need U*C clustering tools to complete analysis of my >> data. > > AFAIK, it hasn't been implemented in ESOM-tools. Maybe its in the > matlab > stuff, but I don't realy know. D'oh! Thank you for the hints and the answers so far. dawe Blog http://daweonline.net Flickr http://flickr.com/photos/daweonline/ |