Re: [Daqpp-forum] additional record
Brought to you by:
lacasta
From: Andrej S. <and...@ij...> - 2007-01-27 16:25:44
|
Hi, Carlos! Great to see you working on a weekend... Registered as astuden. I see that Klaus is also on the team. Great. I think the data format was quite good except for the data length caveat an= d probably a bit more space to write extra data (nchips/nchannels/chip type for Si, npmts/nsamples for sis3300, etc.). I'll patch vmedaq here. Andrej > Mmmm, that reminds me that when Eric talked to me about that I thought > we better sit together and think on a sensible data format. We can > proceed by now patching the existing code everytime we need something > else but then it becomes quite difficult to mantain. Then comes the > issue of backwards compatibility... Ufff. > > In any case, we can use the CVS repository in sourceforge. Register as > a sourceforge user and let me know you alias. I will then include you > as a daqpp developper. Eric is already part of the team. > > Carlos > > > Quoting Andrej Studen <and...@ij...>: > >> We talked with Eric about the following: >> >> There is another Record when SecondDetector is used, namely >> BigDataRecord, >> which is not flagged in VMEdaqObserver. We should probably include tha= t. >> I >> can do that here in a new vmedaq.cc - where should I put it afterwards= ? >> >> Andrej >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar= e >> your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID= =3DDEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Daqpp-forum mailing list >> Daq...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/daqpp-forum >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > |