Re: [Daqpp-forum] additional record

[Carlos L. <Car...@if...>]

Mmmm, that reminds me that when Eric talked to me about that I thought =20
we better sit together and think on a sensible data format. We can =20
proceed by now patching the existing code everytime we need something =20
else but then it becomes quite difficult to mantain. Then comes the =20
issue of backwards compatibility... Ufff.

In any case, we can use the CVS repository in sourceforge. Register as =20
a sourceforge user and let me know you alias. I will then include you =20
as a daqpp developper. Eric is already part of the team.

Carlos


Quoting Andrej Studen <and...@ij...>:

> We talked with Eric about the following:
>
> There is another Record when SecondDetector is used, namely BigDataRecord,
> which is not flagged in VMEdaqObserver. We should probably include that. I
> can do that here in a new vmedaq.cc - where should I put it afterwards?
>
> Andrej
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share yo=
ur
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DD=
EVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Daqpp-forum mailing list
> Daq...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/daqpp-forum
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.