From: Mark U. <ma...@cs...> - 2012-01-17 20:06:18
|
Leo Doing it in the typechecker sounds best to me. 1. You might be able to give better error messages there. 2. It will/should work on unicode input, not just latex input. Cheers Mark On 18 January 2012 02:07, Leo Freitas <leo...@ne...> wrote: > Hi, > > We are trying to solve the problem (e.g., stack overflow) involving cyclic > parents of sections. > The error occurs when calculating the latex markup function of parents > during parsing. > > Our change/solution avoids the error, and enables sections with cyclic > parents to be parsed. > Next, the typechecker ensures that the cycle is an error (e.g., note 1, p. > 5, 13.2.2.1). > > So the question is, should the error be flagged by the parser or the > typechecker? > Looking at the standard, this we couldn't find where it would be. At the > moment, > we have it at the typechecker. > > Comments? > > Leo & Andrius > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > CZT-Devel mailing list > CZT...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/czt-devel > |