From: Hin-Tak L. <hin...@ya...> - 2003-06-25 07:42:41
|
As I previously say - there is no significant change between 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 (and CVS) other than fixing some compiler warnings. There is a hell lot of difference between Redhat 6.2 and Redhat 9 regarding font management, just as the Xfree86 terminfo/termcap problem I mentioned. Redhat 9 uses a separate font server, rather than have static font directories like RH 6.2. I suspect the RH 9 font server doesn't work all the time, or reliably. You could go back to static font directories, or have font directories in addition to font server, by modifying the "FontPath" entries in /etc/X11/XF86Config. "man 5 XF86Config" for details, I think. Please note that cxterm is no longer in active development (the sourceforge project is "unofficial" and the original authors are not here)- it has worked almost as it was in 1995, so any breakage is usually due to changes elsewhere...) Jun Sun wrote: > Just when I was happy, all of a sudden fonts are all screwed up. > Instead of nice Chinese sentences, only some random senseless characters > are displayed in place. > > And I don't even recall what I changed to cause this. I rebuilt > cxterm with latest CVS, and still have the same results. > > Does anybody have a clue what goes wrong here? > > Actually I had this problem when I upgrade from redhat 6.2 to redhat 9 > while still using the old 5.2.2 release. I thought I fixed the problem > by using the latest CVS source (actually it worked on that particular > day, I swear) > > Strange. > > Jun > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > _______________________________________________ > cxterm-devel mailing list > cxt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cxterm-devel > |