It would be nice to open tabbed sub-windows for each
sub-directory. Currently, I run about 7 instances of
WinCVS...one for each sub-directory I'm working in. I'd
prefer one instance of WinCVS with 7 tabs.
Yes. The change location interface is insufficient.
I want to preserve my cursor selection and sub-directory
location. Each time I change location, I have to navigate to
the correct sub-directory and file within a sub-directory.
Just like in Mozilla, each tab preserves its URL and position
on the web page. I would like WinCVS to have tabs, each
with its own sub-directory location and output window.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
> I want to preserve my cursor selection and sub-directory
> location. Each time I change location, I have to
> navigate to the correct sub-directory and file within a
> sub-directory.
Hmmm. Though I predicted your answer was such that...
In fact, I have had the same thoghts, but at least for me,
I found the change location interface is sufficient.
Indeed, your idea is interesting...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
1. Tabs are planned for "after 1.4 stable" version. It's too
much of a change to do it now.
2. It may be possible to store the folder selection when
changing the browse locations which should help to ease the
pain of re-selecting when changing.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2004-10-29
Logged In: YES
user_id=236368
IMHO it would be more useful to tab existing WinCVS
subwindows (main one and graphs).
And properly handling of WinXP themes would be great also :-)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
> IMHO it would be more useful to tab existing WinCVS
> subwindows (main one and graphs).
> And properly handling of WinXP themes would be great also :-)
Both of which are really good ideas IMO but should better be
addressed in individual RFEs.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=871950
You mean, "Change location" interface is insufficient
for you?
# For changing location: View -> Browse Location -> Change
# For browsing its history: use combobox placed on toolbar
I have several active local copies(more than 7), but I run
only single instance of WinCvs, though rarely I run two or
three...
Logged In: YES
user_id=956581
Hello Hiroaki:
Yes. The change location interface is insufficient.
I want to preserve my cursor selection and sub-directory
location. Each time I change location, I have to navigate to
the correct sub-directory and file within a sub-directory.
Just like in Mozilla, each tab preserves its URL and position
on the web page. I would like WinCVS to have tabs, each
with its own sub-directory location and output window.
Logged In: YES
user_id=871950
pjbondi,
> I want to preserve my cursor selection and sub-directory
> location. Each time I change location, I have to
> navigate to the correct sub-directory and file within a
> sub-directory.
Hmmm. Though I predicted your answer was such that...
In fact, I have had the same thoghts, but at least for me,
I found the change location interface is sufficient.
Indeed, your idea is interesting...
Logged In: YES
user_id=119527
1. Tabs are planned for "after 1.4 stable" version. It's too
much of a change to do it now.
2. It may be possible to store the folder selection when
changing the browse locations which should help to ease the
pain of re-selecting when changing.
Logged In: YES
user_id=236368
IMHO it would be more useful to tab existing WinCVS
subwindows (main one and graphs).
And properly handling of WinXP themes would be great also :-)
Logged In: YES
user_id=158827
> IMHO it would be more useful to tab existing WinCVS
> subwindows (main one and graphs).
> And properly handling of WinXP themes would be great also :-)
Both of which are really good ideas IMO but should better be
addressed in individual RFEs.