Menu

#809 cvs log -w used in the Graph

WinCvs
open
WinCvs (709)
3
2004-10-15
2004-10-12
Lee
No

I am using WinCVS 1.3.20.1 Beta 20 (Build 1) and am
having a problem with:
cvs log -w<username1>,<username2>

If I want to look at a revision graph for a file and want
to filter it I add 2 users names into the by username
filter box.
WinCVS then performs the command:
"cvs log -w<username1>,<username2> foo.c"
However this will only give me the graph for username1
and does not include username2. The order is not
important, it will only use the username closest to the -
w.

If I type a command in like this:
cvs log -w<username1> -w<username2> foo.c

This will give me the correct output in a log. Would it be
possible to allow this behaviour to be added to the graph
viewer? Or am I using it incorrectly?

Discussion

  • Jerzy Kaczorowski

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=119527

    When trying the command line log it is also missing the second
    user so it's a CVSNT problem. According to the log
    documentation user logins are to be comma-separated so we
    won't be changing the interface - it has to fixed in the log
    command itself.

    Please try reporting the issue at:
    www.cvsnt.org

     
  • Jerzy Kaczorowski

    • status: open --> pending-invalid
     
  • Lee

    Lee - 2004-10-15
    • status: pending-invalid --> open-invalid
     
  • Lee

    Lee - 2004-10-15

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1102025

    I took on board what you said, so I tried some more
    experimentation. I don't think the issue is with CVSNT.
    If I type the command:
    cvs log -w<user1>,<user2> foo.h
    into a DOS box with the path set up to use:
    C:\Program Files\GNU\WinCvs 1.3\CVSNT\cvs.exe
    I get the result:
    total revisions: 2; selected revisions: 2
    description:
    ----------------------------
    revision 1.1.1.1.2.58
    date: 2004/04/21 14:12:35; author: <user1>; state: Exp;
    lines: +3 -3; kopt: o; commitid: 51c408681510000;
    Remove some code.
    ----------------------------
    revision 1.1.1.1.2.57
    date: 2004/04/21 14:00:27; author: <user2>; state: Exp;
    lines: +3 -3; kopt: o; commitid: 54440867e790000;
    Correct some errors.

    If I type the same command into WinCVS, I only get:
    total revisions: 2; selected revisions: 1
    description:
    ----------------------------
    revision 1.1.1.1.2.58
    date: 2004/04/21 14:12:35; author: <user1>; state: Exp;
    lines: +3 -3; kopt: o; commitid: 51c408681510000;
    Remove some code.

    WinCVS is set to use the same version of CVS.exe.

     
  • Jerzy Kaczorowski

    • status: open-invalid --> open
     
  • Jerzy Kaczorowski

    • priority: 5 --> 3
     
  • Jerzy Kaczorowski

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=119527

    I stand corrected - further testing proves you are right. Needs
    an investigation...

     
  • Lee

    Lee - 2005-02-28

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1102025

    Is there a fix for this that I could try?

     

Log in to post a comment.