[cvsacl-users] cvs add on folders does not respect acls?
Brought to you by:
sbaris
From: Dawid W. <Daw...@cs...> - 2004-03-08 09:18:27
|
Hi. I really like the concept of cvs-acl, first of all; I've been looking around for a while and none of the existing approaches appeal to me (managing tons of unix users/ groups and file permissions, loginfo scripts etc). Now, I have two questions: 1) Is it just me, or is add operation on a folder always permitted (regardless of what you place in the acls)? I've just tried forbidding user test access to a module and I could still add a folder to it (even though I couldn't add any file, which is the correct behavior). 2) When is the hierarchical (cascading) acl scheme going to be implemented and available? I am currently using cvs-1.11.10-cvsacl-1.1.3-patched, please let me know if any of the above are already available in the CVS HEAD at sourceforge. Regards, Dawid -- Dawid Weiss, http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/dweiss Laboratory of Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Poznan UT, Poland |