From: Klaus J. R. <Kla...@at...> - 2003-01-18 21:27:23
|
In <200...@ba...>, Joost van Baal <j.e...@uv...> writes: > Yes, the reason to move from an /usr/sbin/sendmail interface to talking > SMTP quite often is portability: Microsoft Windows lacks a ``standard'' > interface to send out mail. However, using /usr/sbin/sendmail (if it's > available) has benefits: you can rely on the local mail queueing, to > deal with stuff like network outages. Therefore, I feel it's a wise > thing to use this interface where available. (Unix MUA's generally do > this, too.) Agreed. Would you expect the MUA to handle a message in SMTP format, or would you want the ability to specify recipients, subject etc. when calling the MUA. The former approach obviously is a lot easier to implement and would be my preferred option, something like --mua="/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" > Hm, what was the reason to start reimplementing the same script in Perl? > (I couldn't find any rationale.) Would it be useful if I'd write a patch > for the Perl script? Mainly the need to run cvs-syncmail on a system that did not have Python installed, and once I had ported the code to Perl I thought others might possibly have an interest, too :-) A patch would certainly be appreciated, or at least a clarification of the requirement. -- Klaus Johannes Rusch Kla...@at... http://www.atmedia.net/KlausRusch/ |