|
From: Klaus J. R. <Kla...@at...> - 2003-01-18 21:27:23
|
In <200...@ba...>, Joost van Baal <j.e...@uv...> writes:
> Yes, the reason to move from an /usr/sbin/sendmail interface to talking
> SMTP quite often is portability: Microsoft Windows lacks a ``standard''
> interface to send out mail. However, using /usr/sbin/sendmail (if it's
> available) has benefits: you can rely on the local mail queueing, to
> deal with stuff like network outages. Therefore, I feel it's a wise
> thing to use this interface where available. (Unix MUA's generally do
> this, too.)
Agreed.
Would you expect the MUA to handle a message in SMTP format, or would you want
the ability to specify recipients, subject etc. when calling the MUA. The
former approach obviously is a lot easier to implement and would be my
preferred option, something like
--mua="/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
> Hm, what was the reason to start reimplementing the same script in Perl?
> (I couldn't find any rationale.) Would it be useful if I'd write a patch
> for the Perl script?
Mainly the need to run cvs-syncmail on a system that did not have Python
installed, and once I had ported the code to Perl I thought others might
possibly have an interest, too :-)
A patch would certainly be appreciated, or at least a clarification of the
requirement.
--
Klaus Johannes Rusch
Kla...@at...
http://www.atmedia.net/KlausRusch/
|