RFC: Additive semantics of ACL setting

[Alexey M. <al...@hs...>]

>>>>> "AM" == Alexey Morozov <mo...@no...> writes:

 AM> Thus I propose the following code semantics changes:

 AM> 1. 'grant' has additive semantics.  

Maybe I agree.  Though, there are so many cases to balance, that we
simply need to stop some time.  I'm slightly afraid of it all.

 AM> 5. Files (branches) have the similar ACL behaviour. The only
 AM> major difference is ability to set 'default' file permissions for
 AM> a particular folder using cvs acl grant user
 AM> default:checkin,checkout folder/ syntax (not sure if it works in
 AM> fact though :-) Alex?)

It should work, AFAIK. 

 AM> So I need to know what to you think about proposed semantics...

It looks consistent. 

--alexm