Re: http_proxy client
Brought to you by:
tyranny
From: John C. N. y L. <nj...@nt...> - 2001-10-23 00:56:51
|
Alexey Mahotkin wrote: > > >>>>> "AM" == Alexey Morozov <mo...@no...> writes: > > AM> I have committed the files into NCLI-1-11-1 branch. The http_proxy > AM> method looks Ok (I have tested it a bit), although authorized http > AM> proxy access method was not in place yet (does anybody really need > AM> it?). > > As per authorized http proxy access -- I think we could post-pone that > until someone actually requests that. And I think there won't be a > need to enhance the cvs_proxy syntax (though with regexes it's > simple). We could use simply cvs_proxy_username/cvs_proxy_password, > or explicitly ask for the latter. > Our set-up over is through an authorized web proxy... Just a simple username/password challenge =) Perhaps I can coaxed our Net ad to add a non-authenticated proxy.... Well maybe =) Cheers, John Clark -- /) John Clark Naldoza y Lopez (\ / ) Software Design Engineer III ( \ _( (_ _ Web-Application Development _) )_ (((\ \> /_> Cable Modem Network Management System <_\ </ /))) (\\\\ \_/ / NEC Telecom Software Phils., Inc. \ \_/ ////) \ / \ / \ _/ phone: (+63 32) 233-9142 loc. 3113 \_ / / / cellphone: (+63 919) 399-4742 \ \ / / email: nj...@nt... \ \ "Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet getting the work done" --Linus Torvalds |