Re: WebLoad HTTP performance numbers

[Vlad W. <wvl...@gm...>]

On 7/10/07, Robert Iakobashvili <cor...@gm...> wrote:
>
> On 7/10/07, Vlad W. <wvl...@gm...> wrote:
> > > For example, I do not know, but Vlad seems to be in position to
> > > comment about Mercury LoadRunner numbers.
>
> > It was long time ago and I don't remember the numbers...
>
> Y are kidding ...


Sometimes.

To conclude, LoadRunner is also not in business of performance and stress
> load testing, but rather in business process testing.


Not exactly. Its place is "application performace testing", including
business process simulation script creating, load testing of the application
this script and multiple virual users, and analysis of obtained statistics.

The business process testing itself, i.e. functional testing, is the area of
WinRunner/QuickTest.

On the high-end we will be competing with IXIA IxLoad and Spirent Avalanche,
> and by adding more context analysis features will fill the gap between
> the Big-HW tools and business process testing (WebLoad, LoadRunner,
> OpenSTA),


That's would be good position.

Vlad