Thread: RE: Re: [Ctags] ctags and variable types
Brought to you by:
dhiebert
From: <Joh...@ub...> - 2001-01-15 11:16:56
Attachments:
cb.gif
|
Darren, Having said that, it would be pretty usefull as it obviously would allow one to distinguish between the various versions of a function. I don't know if you remember - I showed you this quite a qhile back - but I have a Java (could do C++) class browser for vim that sits on top of ctags (image attached). It would be nice if I could show the function signature - perhaps showing the arg types but not the arg names. Perhaps this is already possible and I just haven't figured it out. For instance in the attached gif the class PhoenixSelectionStatus has two instances of the method getSessionData() - it would be handy to be able to tell which is which. Thanks JL -----Original Message----- From: darren Sent: 13 January 2001 18:49 To: jeknott Cc: darren; ctags-users Subject: Re: [Ctags] ctags and variable types On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Judson E. Knott wrote: > Does anyone know how to get exuberant ctags to give a listing of all > variable types used within a file? I managed to get it to show everything > in structs and globaly, but not in functions...anyone have any ideas? Are you asking if ctags will generate tags for C function arguments, such as arg1 and arg2 in the example below? void foo (int arg1, char* arg2) If that is your question, ctags does not do this. -- Darren Hiebert <da...@hi...> http://darren.hiebert.com _______________________________________________ Ctags-users mailing list Cta...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ctags-users |
From: <ga...@ca...> - 2001-01-16 21:26:22
|
/ FROM: Darren Hiebert <da...@hi...>, Jan 15 22:03 2001 | ABOUT: RE: Re: [Ctags] ctags and variable types | ... | | It would be far too difficult to retain the entire function | signature at present (the C parser used by ctags is not a precise | parser). It would require some significant changes. Well, if you ever do [make significant changes to the parser], I'd *LOVE* it if ctags could locate and tag types that are defined within functions. :) g |
From: Darren H. <da...@hi...> - 2001-01-16 04:04:46
|
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 Joh...@ub... wrote: > Having said that, it would be pretty usefull as it obviously would > allow one to distinguish between the various versions of a function. > ... > For instance in the attached gif the class PhoenixSelectionStatus has > two instances of the method getSessionData() - it would be handy to be > able to tell which is which. It would be far too difficult to retain the entire function signature at present (the C parser used by ctags is not a precise parser). It would require some significant changes. -- Darren Hiebert <da...@hi...> http://darren.hiebert.com |