From: Alan K. <al...@tr...> - 2011-06-10 18:02:46
|
On 3/20/2008 1:15 PM, Alan Krueger wrote: > (The question was asked earlier, but in the middle of another message. > I'll restate the question to ensure it doesn't get missed.) > > Does anyone object to using Subversion for our source control? We can't > use both SVN and CVS at the same time. We would have to enable SVN, > convert our existing CVS repository into SVN, then import that into SF's > SVN repository. > > It takes a bit of work, but it should be easy to back out if something > went wrong in the conversion process. I'm in favor of Subversion > myself, I've found it quite a bit easier to use than CVS and more powerful. I got only positive responses back then, but I didn't have time to look at it then. I'd forgotten about this until recently. I've converted over the CVS repo into SVN and imported it. I haven't done any cleanup like adding svn:ignore properties anywhere or removing the CVSROOT from the trunk yet. I disabled the CVS feature in the project, but we can get it back if someone rabidly objects at the last minute. =) Thanks, Alan |